Angewandte
Chemie
formed into enone 26 by using the Ito–Saegusa oxidation.[19]
Enone 26 was converted into enol triflate 27, which was
subjected to a Negishi coupling[20] to afford triene 28. Regio-
and stereoselective dihydroxylation of triene 28 with a stoi-
chiometric amount of OsO4 gave diol 5. The high regio- and
stereoselectivity could be explained by considering that steric
hindrance at the C11 methyl group shielded the olefin at C1/
C2, and that the strain and pyramidal distortion of the olefin
at C3/C4 enhance its reactivity (see the Supporting Informa-
tion). The phenyl selenyl group was not affected during the
conversion of selenide 6 into diol 5 under different oxidizing
conditions, including the use of DDQ, Parikh–Doering
oxidation, and OsO4. The introduction of the hydroxy group
at C5 by using a Mislow–Evans-type rearrangement was next
attempted. The oxidation of the aromatic selenide group in 5
with mCPBA and subsequent [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrange-
ment with P(OMe)3 afforded triol 29. The removal of both
TBS groups in 29 afforded 13-oxyingenol (3), a parent
compound of 13-oxyingenol derivatives, such as 1. 13-oxy-
ingenol (3) was protected as two acetonide groups to afford
compound 30. Acylation of the remaining tertiary hydroxy
group at C13 gave dodecanoyl ester 31. Hydrolysis of two
acetonides with aqueous HCl, followed by selective acylation
of the primary hydroxy group, led to the formation of 13-
oxyingenol derivative 1. The spectral data of synthetically
obtained 13-oxyingenol derivative 1 (1H NMR, 13C NMR,
HRMS) were in full agreement with those of the natural
23
product. The optical rotation of 1 (½aꢁD ¼ꢀ25.0 (c = 0.10,
CHCl3)) was in good agreement with that of the isolated
23
sample (½aꢁD ¼ꢀ24.6 (c = 0.17, CHCl3)).
In conclusion, we have achieved the first total synthesis of
(ꢀ)-13-oxyingenol (3) and its natural derivative 1 in 21 steps
from spiro ketone 8. The presence of the hydroxy groups at
C2 and C7 enables the efficient functionalization of the A and
B rings. The highlights of this approach are the use of an RCM
for the construction of an inside–outside framework and
a Mislow–Evans-type [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement for the
introduction of a hydroxy group at C5. This synthetic strategy
is also applicable to the synthesis of ingenol (4) and more
concise than the method we used in our previous work.[6]
Scheme 5. Total synthesis of 13-oxyingenol derivative 1. Reagents and
conditions: a) DIBAL, toluene, ꢀ788C, 96%; b) MsCl, Me2N-
(CH2)3NMe2, toluene, 08C; c) (PhSe)2, NaBH4, THF/EtOH, RT, quant.
(2 steps); d) DDQ, pH 6.6 phosphate buffer, tBuOH/CH2Cl2, RT,
quant.; e) TBSCl, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, 97%; f) SO3·pyr, DMSO,
Et3N, CH2Cl2, RT, quant.; g) TMSCl, LHMDS, Et3N, THF, ꢀ788C;
h) Pd(OAc)2, DMSO, RT, 64% (2 steps); i) Tf2NPh, LHMDS, THF,
ꢀ408C; j) Me2Zn, Pd(PPh3)4, THF, RT; k) OsO4, THF/pyr, 08C, then
aq. NaHSO3, RT, 64% (3 steps); l) mCPBA, THF, ꢀ788C; m) P(OMe)3,
MeOH, 08C, 61% (2 steps) (borsm quant.); n) HF·pyr, THF/pyr, RT,
quant.; o) 2,2-dimethoxypropane, PPTS, CH2Cl2, RT; p) C11H23CO2H,
EDCI, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, 63% (2 steps); q) HCl (1m), THF, RT, 99%;
r) (C5H11CO)2O, Et3N, CH2Cl2, ꢀ208C, 85%. borsm=based on recov-
ered starting material, DDQ=2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoqui-
none, DIBAL=diisobutylaluminum hydride, DMSO=dimethyl sulfox-
ide, EDCI=1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochlo-
ride, LHMDS=lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, mCPBA=m-chloroper-
benzoic acid, Mes=2,4,6-trimethylphenyl, Ms=methanesulfonyl, o-
Tol = o-tolyl, PPTS=pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate, Tf=trifluorometha-
nesulfonyl, TMS=trimethylsilyl.
Received: February 20, 2012
Published online: && &&, &&&&
Keywords: 13-oxyingenol · inside–outside framework ·
.
metathesis · sigmatropic rearrangement · terpenoids
[1] a) D. Uemura, H. Ohwaki, Y. Hirata, Y.-P. Chen, H.-Y. Hsu,
[2] K. Zechmeister, F. Brandl, W. Hoppe, E. Hecker, J. H. Opfer-
[3] C. M. Hasler, G. Acs, M. Blumberg, Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 202.
[4] M. Fujiwara, M. Okamato, K. Ijichi, K. Tokuhisa, Y. Hanasaki,
K. Katuura, D. Uemura, S. Shigeta, K. Konno, T. Yokota, M.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!