242
M. Selvaganapathy, N. Raman / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 20 (2012) 238–242
[13] P.K. Sasmal, A.K. Patra, A.R. Chakravarty, Synthesis, structure, DNA binding and
DNA cleavage activity of oxovanadium(IV) N-salicylidene-S-methyldithiocarba-
zate complexes of phenanthroline bases, J. Inorg. Biochem. 102 (2008)
1463–1472.
[14] R. Rao, A.K. Patra, P.R. Chetana, Synthesis, structure, DNA binding and oxidative
cleavage activity of ternary (L-leucine/isoleucine) copper(II) complexes of het-
erocyclic bases, Polyhedron 27 (2008) 1343–1352.
[21] Anal.Calc. for [C38H30N6O2Co]Cl: C, 69.4; H, 4.9; N, 12.8; O, 5.2; Co, 9.1%. Found: C,
69.1; H, 4.6; N, 12.7; O, 4.9; Co, 8.9%; FT-IR (KBr disc): 3,256 (NH), 1,593 (HC_N),
1,436 υasy (COO), 1,319
m ×10−3(Ω−1 mol−1 cm2) 55.38; μeff (BM) 4.85; λmax in DMSO 14,989,
17,511 and 22,649 cm−1; MS: m/z 659.
υ ;
sy(COO); 507 (M_O), 481 (M_N)cm−1
∧
[22] Anal.Calc. for [C38H30N6O2Zn]Cl: C, 68.7; H, 5.0; N, 12.9; O, 5.0; Zn, 9.9%. Found: C,
68.3; H, 4.5; N, 12.6; O, 4.8; Zn, 9.8%; FT-IR (KBr disc): 3,256 (NH), 1,599 (HC_N),
[15] K. Coleman, Recent advances in the treatment of Gram-positive infections, Drug
Discov. Today Ther. Strateg. 1 (2004) 455–460.
1,444 υasy(COO); 1,317 υ ;
sy(COO); 503 (M_O), 478 (M_N) cm-1 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ: 6.9–7.2 (phenyl multiplet), 7.7–8.2 (phen multiplet), 8.6 (s, 1H,
\CH_N) 2.6 (\CH2) ppm; 13C NMR(CDCl3): d=52.60 (CH), 54.02 (CH2),
105.13, 108.05, 113.69, 112.77, 118.36 (aromatic C), 120.05, 125.27, 127.17,
128.78, 139.34, 147.14 (indole C), 157.25 (CH_N), 165.47(COO\)ppm;
[16] The potassium salt of the Schiff base ligand (KL) was prepared by the following
reaction. The potassium salt of tryptophan was prepared by following general
procedure. The tryptophan (0.01 mol) dissolved in 1:1 water–ethanol (40 mL)
was added to a hot ethanolic solution (30 mL) of KOH and the resulting solution
was stirred to obtain a homogeneous solution. Then, to this solution an ethanolic
solution of benzaldehyde (0.01 mol) was added drop-wise and the resultant mix-
ture was refluxed for ca. 5 h. The pale yellow colored solution was obtained. Then
the solution was reduced to one-third on a water bath. The solid complex precip-
itated was filtered off, washed thoroughly with ethanol and dried in vacuo. Yield
75%.
∧
m ×10−3 (Ω−1 mol−1 cm2) 57.91; λmax in DMSO 29,489, 33,109 cm−1; MS:
m/z 665.
[23] A.M. Pyle, J.P. Rehmann, R. Meshoyrer, C.V. Kumar, N.J. Turro, J.K. Barton, Mixed-
ligand complexes of ruthenium(II): factors governing binding to DNA, Am. Chem.
Soc. 111 (1989) 3051–3058.
[24] X.W. Liu, J. Li, H. Li, K.C. Zheng, H. Chao, L.N. Ji, Synthesis, characterization,
DNA-binding and photocleavage of complexes [Ru(phen)2(6-OH-dppz)]2 +
and [Ru(phen)2(6-NO2-dppz)]2 +, J. Inorg. Biochem. 99 (2005) 2372–2380.
[25] J.B. Lepecp, C. Paoletti, A fluorescent complex between ethidium bromide and
nucleic acids: physical–chemical characterization, J. Mol. Biol. 27 (1967) 87–106.
[26] L. Jin, P. Yang, Synthesis and DNA binding studies of cobalt(III) mixed-polypyridyl
complex, J. Inorg. Biochem. 68 (1997) 79.
[27] S. Satyanarayana, J.C. Dabrowiak, J.B. Chaires, Tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II)
enantiomer interactions with DNA: mode and specificity of binding, Biochemistry
32 (1993) 2573.
[28] Y. Ni, D. Lin, S. Kokat, Synchronous fluorescence, UV–visible spectrophotometric,
and voltammetric studies of the competitive interaction of bis(1,10-
phenanthroline)copper(II) complex and neutral red with DNA, Anal. Biochem.
352 (2006) 23.
[29] R.P. Hertzberg, P.B. Dervan, Cleavage of double helical DNA by methidium-
propyl-EDTA-iron(II), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982) 313.
[30] D.S. Sigman, D.R. Graham, L.E. Marshall, K.A. Reich, Cleavage of DNA by coordina-
tion complexes. superoxide formation in the oxidation of 1,10-phenanthroline-
cuprous complexes by oxygen — relevance to DNA-cleavage reaction, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 5419.
[31] T.M.A. Alves, A.F. Silva, M. Brandao, T.S.M. Grandi, E.F.A. Smania, A. Smania Jr., C.L.
Zani, Biological screening of Brazilian medicinal plants, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz
95 (2000) 367.
[17] Anal.Calc. for [C18H14N2O2K]: C, 65.8; H, 4.5; N, 8.7; O, 9.9. Found: C, 65.6; H, 4.3;
N, 8.5; O, 9.7; FT-IR (KBr disc): 3,252 (NH), 1,667 (HC_N), 1,456 υasy(COO),
1,375 υsy(COO) cm−1 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 6.8–7.5 (phenyl multiplet), 8.9 (s,
;
1H, \CH_N), 2.4 (\CH2) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3): d=53.90 539 (CH2), 55.40
(CH), 105.62, 108.15, 111.82, 112.37, 117.95 (aromatic C), 118.74, 121.40,
125.11, 126.33, 128.53, 136.62 (indole C), 167.11 (CH_N), 171.56 (COO\)
ppm; λmax in DMSO 42,564 and 36,978 cm−1; MS: m/z 330.
[18] The complexes were prepared by mixing the appropriate molar quantity of the
above ligand and the metal salts using the following procedure. An ethanolic so-
lution of Schiff base (0.003 mol) was stirred with the ethanolic solution (5 mL) of
anhydrous metal(II) chlorides (0.003 mol) for ca.1 h. To the above mixture, a
methanolic solution (5 mL) of 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) (0.006 mol) was added in a
1:1:2 molar ratio and the stirring was continued for ca.1 h. The solid product
obtained was filtered and washed with ethanol. Yield 73–85%. The ligand is solu-
ble in common organic solvents but the complexes are soluble only in CHCl3, DMF
and DMSO.
[19] Anal.Calc. for [C38H30N6O2Cu]Cl: C, 68.7; H, 4.8; N, 12.7; O, 4.9; Cu, 9.8%. Found: C,
68.5; H, 4.6; N, 12.6; O, 4.8; Cu, 9.5%; FT-IR (KBr disc): 3,252 (NH), 1,634 (HC_N),
1,444
υ
asy(COO), 1,317
υ
sy(COO); 513 (M_O), 478 (M_N)cm−1
;
∧
m ×10−3(Ω−1 mol−1 cm2) 45.32; μeff (BM) 1.73; λmax in DMSO 27,243,
35,109 and 13,780 cm−1; MS: m/z 663.
[20] Anal.Calc. for [C38H30N6O2Ni]Cl: C, 69.4; H, 4.8; N, 12.9; O, 5.1; Ni, 9.2%. Found: C,
69.0; H, 4.6; N, 12.7; O, 4.9; Ni, 8.9%; FT-IR (KBr disc): 3,252 (NH), 1,615 (HC_N),
[32] S. Stepanovic, N. Antic, I. Dakic, M. Svabic-Vlahovic, In vitro antimicrobial activity
of propilis and antimicrobial drugs, Microbiol. Res. 158 (2003) 353.
[33] R. Ramesh, S. Maheswaran, Synthesis, spectra, dioxygen affinity and antifungal
activity of Ru(III) Schiff base complexes, J. Inorg. Biochem. 96 (2003) 457.
1,431 υasy (COO), 1,315
m ×10−3(Ω−1 mol−1 cm2) 51.20; μeff (BM) 3.19; λmax in DMSO 14,746,
17,165 and 23,387 cm−1; MS: m/z 658.
υ ;
sy(COO); 516 (M_O), 473 (M_N)cm−1
∧