several groups in the literature.3 PDIs aggregated with
relative orthogonal orientations, however, have rarely
been reported.4 Therefore, further investigation of the
effects of the orthogonal orientation between neighboring
PDI units on the photophysical properties is required.
of a series of novel PDI compounds connected by a spiro-
bifluorene core, Spiro-PDI 1, Spiro-PDI 2, and Spiro-PDI
3 (Scheme 1). For the sake of comparison, one other model
compound, F-PDI 4, containing the same components but
with a different linkage, was also prepared. The distances
and angles between the PDI units were fixed by the spiro-
bridge because of its rigid molecular structure,6 and these
compounds were therefore expected to behave as ideal
models for studying the interactions between PDI units
with orthogonally arranged orientations. Detailed syn-
thetic procedures and the corresponding structural char-
acterizations are shown in the Supporting Information
(SI). All of the new compounds were fully characterized
by 1H and 13C NMR and MALDI-TOF mass spectra or
elemental analysis.
Scheme 1. Molecular Structures of the Compounds
The absorption spectra of Spiro-PDI 1, Spiro-PDI 2,
and Spiro-PDI 3 in solution showed two absorption
maxima at 545 and 510 nm, which were attributed to
the absorption of PO-PDI (Figure 1). Another absorp-
tion band that was centered at 688 nm in the absorption
spectra of Spiro-PDI 2 and Spiro-PDI 3 was assigned to
the absorption of PY-PDI. The absorption spectra of the
PO-PDI and PY-PDI units in these compounds were
identical to those of their monomeric counterparts PO-
PDI 5 and PY-PDI 6, suggesting that there are no
significant ground state interactions within these com-
pounds between the PO-PDI or PY-PDI subunits. More
importantly, the absorption spectra of Spiro-PDIs re-
vealed no changes with increasing concentration, sug-
gesting that Spiro-PDI compounds do not self-assemble
into molecular aggregates within the concentration range
tested (1 Â 10À6À1 Â 10À4 mol LÀ1), The absorption
3
spectra of F-PDI 4, however, changed dramatically with
increasing concentration, as shown in the SI, indicating
directly the formation of molecular aggregates in a
concentrated solution. These results clearly revealed the
importance of the orthogonal orientation on hindering
the formation of molecular aggregates in a concentrated
solution.
The linking of conjugated components with a spiro-
bridge represents a sophisticated strategy for achieving
an orthogonal orientation between two conjugated
components.5 Herein, we present the design and synthesis
(2) (a) Ahrens, M. J.; Sinks, L. E.; Rybtchinski, B.; Liu, W.; Jones,
B. A.; Giaimo, J. M.; Gusev, A. V.; Goshe, A. J.; Tiede, D. M.;
Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8284–8294.
(b) Wasielewski, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5051–5066. (c) Rybtchinski,
B.; Sinks, L. E.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 7497–7505.
€
(d) Langhals, H.; Rauscher, M.; Strube, J.; Kuck, D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
1113–1116.
(3) (a) Langhals, H.; Ismael, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1915–1917.
(b) Feng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Li, R.; Xu, W.; Li, X.; Jiang, J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7000–7010. (c) von der Boom, T.; Hayes, R. T.;
Zhao, Y.; Bushard, P. J.; Weiss, E. A.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 9582–9590. (d) Giaimo, J. M.; Gusev, A. V.; Wasielewski,
M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8530–8531. (e) Giaimo, J. M.;
Lockard, J. V.; Sinks, L. E.; Scott, A. M.; Wilson, T. M.; Wasielewski,
M. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 2322–2330.
(4) (a) Langhals, H.; Poxleitner, S.; Krotz, O.; Pust, T.; Walter, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 27, 4559–4562. (b) Langhals, H.; Esterbauer,
A. J.; Walter, A.; Riedle, E.; Pugliesi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
16777–16782.
(5) (a) Salbeck, J.; Yu, N.; Bauer, J.; Weissortel, F.; Bestgen, H.
€
Synth. Met. 1997, 91, 209–215. (b) Salbeck, J.; Schorner, M.; Fuhrmann,
T. Thin Solid Films 2002, 417, 20–25. (c) Saragi, T. P. I.; Spehr, T.;
Siebert, A.; Fuhrmann, T.; Salbeck, J. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1011–1065.
(c) Wong, K. T.; Chen, H. F.; Fang, F. Ch. Org. lett. 2006, 8, 3501–3504.
(d) Wong, K. T.; Ku, S. Y.; Cheng, Y. M.; Lin, X. Y.; Hung, Y. Y.; Pu,
S. C.; Chou, P. T.; Lee, G. H.; Peng, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 456–
465. (e) Chien, Y. Y.; Wong, K. T.; Chou, P. T.; Cheng, Y. M. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 2874–2875.
Figure 1. Absoprtion (solid symbol) and fluorescence (open
symbol) spectra of Spiro-PDI 1 (black), Spiro-PDI 2 (red),
and Spiro-PDI 3 (blue) in toluene.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012
3053