D
H.-j. Gao et al.
Letter
Synlett
Table 3 (continued)
gene has general applicability owing to its strong electro-
philicity. It can therefore serve as an alternative and practi-
cal strategy for introducing sulfur-containing functional-
ities into organic molecules. Studies on the mechanism,
scope expansion, and limitations of this RSO2Na/triphos-
gene system are in progress and will be reported shortly.
SR
Triphosgene
R2
R2
+
RSO2Na
N
–78 °C–rt
CH3CN, 2 h
N
R1
R1
R = CF2H
or Ar
3
4a–r
O2N
CH3
S
N
CH3
S
N
CH3
Funding Information
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zheji-
ang Province (No. LY19B020001, LY18B020004) and the Special Foun-
4q (68%)
4r (37%)
a Reaction conditions: Indole or N-methylpyrrole 3 (0.2 mmol), RSO2Na (2.0
equiv), triphosgene (2.0 equiv), MeCN (2.0 mL), under N2, –78 °C to rt, 2 h.
dation for Young Scientists of Lishui, Zhejiang (2018RC09).Natural
S
cience
F
o
u
n
datio
n
o
f
Z
hejia
n
g
Pro
v
ince(L
Y
1
9
B
0
2
0
0
0
1)Natural
S
cience
F
o
u
n
datio
n
o
f
Z
hejia
n
g
Pro
v
ince(L
Y
1
8
B
0
2
0
0
0
4)
Supporting Information
Although the exact reaction mechanism is still unclear,
on the basis of the above-mentioned results and reports in
the literature,5a,b,6a,10 we hypothesized that the generation
of highly reactive electrophilic CF3S+, CF2HS+, and ArS+ spe-
cies through deoxygenative reduction of RSO2Na with tri-
phosgene is the key step (Scheme 2). Initially, F3CSO2Na is
reduced by phosgene (formed in situ by decomposition of
triphosgene) to give the highly reactive electrophilic inter-
mediate F3CSCl (I), together with CO2, NaCl, and HClO,
among other products. The silyl enol ether then reacts with
the key intermediate F3CSCl (I) through electrophilic addi-
tion to give intermediate II. Finally, rapid elimination of the
Me3Si+ cation from intermediate II results in the generation
of the corresponding product.
Supporting information for this article is available online at
p
p
ortingInformatio
n
Su
p
p
ortingInformatio
n
References and Notes
(1) (a) Uneyama, K. Organofluorine Chemistry; Blackwell: Oxford,
2006. (b) O’Hagan, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308. (c) Wang, J.;
Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.;
Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432.
(2) (a) Landelle, G.; Panossian, A.; Leroux, F. R. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
(Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) 2014, 14, 941. (b) Lawton, G.;
Witty, D. R. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry; Elsevier Science
2015. (c) Xiong, H.-Y.; Pannecoucke, X.; Besset, T. Chem. Eur. J.
2016, 22, 16734. (d) Ni, C.; Hu, M.; Hu, J. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115,
765. (e) Diaferia, M.; Veronesi, F.; Morganti, G.; Nisoli, L.;
Fioretti, D. P. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 163. (f) Xu, X.-H.;
Matsuzaki, K.; Shibata, N. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 731.
(3) (a) Zheng, H.; Huang, Y.; Weng, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57,
1397. (b) Shao, X.; Xu, C.; Lu, L.; Shen, Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015,
48, 1227. (c) Li, S.-G.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5898.
(d) Huang, Y.; He, X.; Li, H.; Weng, Z. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014,
7324. (e) Huang, Y.; He, X.; Lin, X.; Rong, M.; Weng, Z. Org. Lett.
2014, 16, 3284.
Triphosgene
Decomposition
O
Cl
Cl
O
O
fast
CF3SO2Na
(I)
CF3SCl
CF3S-Cl
Cl
Cl
–CO2
–CO2
–NaCl
(4) (a) Bootwicha, T.; Liu, X.; Pluta, R.; Atodiresei, I.; Rueping, M.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12856. (b) Rueping, M.; Liu, X.;
Bootwicha, T.; Pluta, R.; Merkens, C. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50,
2508.
(5) (a) Alazet, S.; Ismalaj, E.; Glenadel, Q.; Le Bars, D.; Billard, T. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4607. (b) Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Liang, F.; Cao, S.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 6992. (c) Liu, Q.; Huang, T.; Zhao,
X.; Wu, J.; Cao, S. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 7755.
Me3SiO
Ar
F3CS
Ar
O
(II)
OSiMe3
SCF3
Ar
–Cl
–SiMe3
Scheme 2 Plausible reaction mechanism
(6) (a) Xu, C.; Ma, B.; Shen, Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9316.
(b) Alazet, S.; Zimmer, L.; Billard, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 8589.
(7) Arimori, S.; Takada, M.; Shibata, N. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1063.
(8) Saravanan, P.; Anbarasan, P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 2894.
(9) He, X.-l.; Swarup, M.; Wu, J.; Jin, C.-d.; Guo, S.-r.; Guo, Z.-p.;
Yang, M. Org. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 2435.
(10) (a) Liu, C.; Lu, Q.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liao, F.; Peng, P.; Lei, A.
Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 6034. (b) Yang, Y.-D.; Iwamoto, K.; Tokunaga,
E.; Shibata, N. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5510. (c) Hang, Z.; Li, Z.;
Liu, Z.-Q. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3648. (d) Zhu, L.; Wang, L.-S.; Li, B.;
Fu, B.; Zhang, C.-P.; Li, W. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 6371.
(e) Liu, Z.-Q.; Liu, D. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 1649. (f) Jiang, L.;
Qian, J.; Yi, W.; Lu, G.; Cai, C.; Zhang, W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
In summary, an efficient and practical approach has
been developed for the electrophilic trifluoromethylthiola-
tion of silyl enol ethers and for the difluoromethylthiolation
of indoles with various organosulfinates.11 This conversion
employs the appropriate sulfinate RSO2Na as a trifluoro-
methylthiolating, difluoromethylthiolating, or arylthiolat-
ing reagent, with the assistance of triphosgene as a reduc-
ing agent and activator to generate the key electrophilic RS+
intermediate in situ. Indeed, the use of F3CSO2Na, F2CHSO2-
Na, and ArSO2Na as sulfonyl precursors is well known, but
this combination of a sodium organosulfinate with triphos-
Thieme. All rights reserved. Synlett 2020, 31, A–E