boron complexes. In this regard, several NꢀN,11 NꢀO,12
NꢀC,13 OꢀO,14 or CꢀC15 bidentate ligands have been
reportedintheliterature. Sincethe fabrication ofelectronic
devices requires the use of π-conjugated molecules that
show good charge transport ability, the integration of
boron complexes into ladder-type systems represents a
useful strategy.16 A very elegant approach consists in the
rigidification of aromatic or heteroaromatic oligomers by
virtue of boron coordination.17 In our case, we present the
integration of four-coordinate boron atoms into the struc-
ture of a laddered system such as indolo[3,2-b]carbazole,
which has revealed itself as a good hole-transporting
material in organic electronics.18 Interestingly, the pre-
sence of boron centers will contribute to modify the
electronic properties of the fused polyheteroaromatic unit.
The synthesis of the 6,12-disubstituted indolocarbazole
was carried out in a three-step route (Scheme 1) that
involved an initial condensation of pyridine-2-carboxalde-
hyde with indole to yield the corresponding 3,30-bis-
(indolyl)methane, 1.19 This compound, when heated in
the presence of iodine, has been proposed to evolve
through a 3-arylideneindole, which dimerizes to yield
6,12-diarylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole, 2.20 The reaction of
2 with triphenylborane led to the isolation of two four-
coordinate boron complexes, namely the mononuclear
(9%), 3, and the dinuclear (5%), 4, compounds.
analysis could be grown for the mononuclear complex 3
(Figure 1). It is worth highlighting the distortion of the
indolocarbazole planarity as a result of the crystal packing
and the structural stretching introduced by the chelation of
the boron atom. The concave arrangement of the fused
heteroaromatic system defines a 157.7° angle between the
planes corresponding to each of the outer benzene rings.
The pyridyl substituents are twisted out of the hypothetical
plane containing the aromatic core. In addition, the boron
atom forms a six-membered ring with a twisted-boat con-
formation. Different BꢀN bond lengths are observed for
˚
˚
the pyridine (1.65 A) and the indolocarbazole (1.54 A) as a
result of their dative and covalent nature, respectively. Con-
˚
versely, BꢀC distances are almost identical (1.62 A) for each
phenyl ring. Despite the presence of some crystallization
solvent molecules and the bulky diphenylboryl group, some
intermolecular contacts are observed in the crystal packing.
In this regard, molecules stack along the a axis following an
ABC columnar pattern in which intra- and intercolumnar
van der Waals interactions are detected between different
indolocarbazole units (see the Supporting Information)
The thermal stability of both 3 and 4 was checked by
thermogravimetric analysis (see the Supporting Information).
Regarding the mononuclear complex 3, an initial weight loss
was detected slightly over 100 °C, presumably due to the
release of solvent molecules trapped in the solid. After this, a
decomposition curve was registered that showed a 5% weight
loss at 400 °C. Similarly, compound 4 displayed a thermal
profile whose decomposition temperature was 380 °C.
Scheme 1. Synthetic Route for the Ligand and Boron Complexes
Figure 1. Two views of the crystal structure of compound 3.
Hydrogen atoms and crystallization solvent have been removed
for the sake of clarity.
(11) (a) Araneda, J. F.; Piers, W. E.; Heyne, B.; Parvez, M.; McDonald,
R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12214. (b) Kubota, Y.; Tsuzuki, T.;
Funabiki, K.; Ebihara, M.; Matsui, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4010. (c) Liu,
Q.-D.; Mudadu, M. S.;Thummel, R.;Tao, Y.;Wang, S.Adv. Funct. Mater.
2005, 15, 143.
(12) (a) Kubota, Y.; Hara, H.; Tanaka, S.; Funabiki, K.; Matsui, M.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6544. (b) Frath, D.; Azizi, S. b.; Ulrich, G.;
Retailleau, P.; Ziessel, R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3414. (c) Zhou, Y.; Xiao,
Y.; Chi, S.; Qian, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 633.
All of the products were fully characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H, 13C, and 11B) and mass spectrometry.
Additionally, single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction
(13) (a) Rao, Y.-L.; Amarne, H.; Wang, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012,
256, 759. (b) Yoshino, J.; Furuta, A.; Kambe, T.; Itoi, H.; Kano, N.;
Kawashima, T.; Ito, Y.; Asashima, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 5026.
(14) (a) Nagai, A.; Kokado, K.; Nagata, Y.; Arita, M.; Chujo, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8605. (b) Ono, K.; Yoshikawa, K.; Tsuji, Y.;
Yamaguchi, H.; Uozumi, R.; Tomura, M.; Taga, K.; Saito, K. Tetra-
hedron 2007, 63, 9354.
(9) Yuan, W. Z.; Chen, S.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Deng, C.; Lu, P.; Sung,
H. H. Y.; Williams, I. D.; Kwok, H. S.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, B. Z. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 11216.
(10) (a) Yen, Y.-S.; Chou, H.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Lin, J. T.
J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 8734. (b) Rousseau, T.; Cravino, A.; Ripaud,
E.; Leriche, P.; Rihn, S.; De Nicola, A.; Ziessel, R.; Roncali, J. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 5082. (c) Kumaresan, D.; Thummel, R. P.; Bura, T.;
Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6335.
(15) Zhao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S. Synthesis
2009, 127.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 13, 2012
3361