total syntheses3,5 and several synthetic approaches6 have been
reported to date, its detailed mechanism of action still remains
unresolved due to the lack of natural sample.7 Herein, we
report a new convergent total synthesis of polycavernoside A
based on a SuzukiꢀMiyaura coupling strategy.
fragments 4 and 5, of comparable complexity, would be
constructed through catalytic asymmetric reactions.
The synthesis of the C1ꢀC8 exo-olefin 4 started with the
known enone 6, which is readily available in three steps
from 1,3-propanediol.10 Catalytic asymmetric hetero-
DielsꢀAlder reaction between silyloxy diene 7, derived
from 6 (TMSTOf, Et3N, room temperature), and aldehyde
811 was promoted by the Jacobsen tridentate chromium-
(III) catalyst 9 (3 mol %)12 and afforded the desired
cycloadduct 10 (Scheme 2). Subsequent treatment with
K2CO3 in MeOH produced a 6:1 mixture of ketone 11a
with the desired stereochemistry at C4 and its isomer 11b,
which was separated by flash column chromatography on
silica gel. Isomerization of the undesired 11b was realized
by using DBU (toluene, room temperature) and gave a
10:1 mixture of 11a and 11b. After two cycles of isomer-
ization, the desired 11a was obtained in 60% overall yield
Our retrosynthetic analysis of polycavernoside A (1) is
illustrated in Scheme 1. We envisioned that the known
intermediate 2, which was used in all previous total
syntheses,3,5 would be derived from bis-pyran 3 through
oxidation of the enol ether moiety to the C9ꢀC10 diketone
functionality followed by macrolactone formation. The
cyclic enol ether 3, in turn, could be constructed by
SuzukiꢀMiyaura coupling of an alkylborane generated
from the exo-olefin 4 and enol triflate 5.8,9 These two key
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
from 6. Luche reduction of 11a (NaBH4, CeCl3 7H2O,
3
MeOH, ꢀ20 °C)13 delivered alcohol 12 in 94% yield as a
single stereoisomer at C5. At this stage, the enantiomeric
excess (96% ee) and the absolute configuration of 12 were
1
established by H NMR analysis of its Mosher esters.14
After protection as a triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) ether, selec-
tive deprotection of the TBS group and iodination of the
resultant alcohol gave iodide 13 in 86% yield (three steps).
Treatment of 13 with t-BuOK furnished the exo-olefin 4,
which was directly used in the next coupling reaction (see
Scheme 4).
The synthesis of the C9ꢀC16 enol triflate 5 commenced
with (R)-(þ)-citronellal (97.2% ee), which was converted
into alcohol 14 via a six-step sequence15 (Scheme 3).
Ozonolysis of the double bond gave aldehyde 15 in 92%
yield. Catalytic asymmetric allylation of 15 with prenyl
bromide was carried out using the chiral sulfonamide
ligand 16 and following the procedure of Kishi and co-
workers;16 it provided alcohol 17 (31%) and the corre-
sponding diol (69%) as single stereoisomers, respectively.
Reprotection of the primary alcohol of the latter as its TBS
ether afforded 17 in 86% yield. Asymmetric dihydroxyla-
tion of the terminal alkene using (DHQ)2PYR as a chiral
ligand17 led to triol 18 in 97% yield. Selective protection of
the primary alcohol as its tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPS)
ether, removal of the TBS group under acidic conditions
(5) (a) Paquette, L. A.; Barriault, L.; Pissarnitski, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 4542–4543. (b) Paquette, L. A.; Barriault, L.; Pissarnitski,
D.; Johnston, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 619–631. (c) White, J. D.;
Blakemore, P. R.; Browder, C. C.; Hong, J.; Lincoln, C. M.; Nagornyy,
P. A.; Robarge, L. A.; Wardrop, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8593–
8595. (d) Blakemore, P. R.; Browder, C. C.; Hong, J.; Lincoln, C. M.;
Nagornyy, P. A.; Robarge, L. A.; Wardrop, D. J.; White, J. D. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 5449–5460. (e) Woo, S. K.; Lee, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 4564–4565.
(10) Robertson, J.; Dallimore, J. W. P.; Meo, P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
3857–3859.
(11) Keck, G. E.; Wager, C. A.; Wager, T. T.; Savin, K. A.; Covel,
J. A.; McLaws, M. D.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Cee, V. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 231–234.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(6) (a) Perez-Balado, C.; Marko, I. E. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2331–
2349. (b) Barry, C. S.; Bushby, N.; Harding, J. R.; Willis, C. L. Org. Lett.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
2005, 7, 2683–2686. (c) Perez-Balado, C.; Marko, I. E. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 4887–4890. (d) Dumeunier, R.; Marko, I. E. Tetrahedron Lett.
(12) Dossetter, A. G.; Jamison, T. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2398–2400.
2000, 41, 10219–10222.
(7) (a) Cagide, E.; Louzao, M. C.; Ares, I. R.; Vieytes, M. R.; Yotsu-
Yamashita, M.; Paquette, L. A.; Yasumoto, T.; Botana, L. M. Cell.
Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 19, 185–194. (b) Barriault, L.; Boulet, S. L.;
Fujiwara, K.; Murai, A.; Paquette, L. A.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 2069–2072.
(8) For selected reviews on SuzukiꢀMiyaura coupling, see:
(a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457–2483.
(b) Chemler, S. R.; Trauner, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4544–4568. (c) Suzuki, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 6722–6737.
(13) (a) Luche, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2226–2227.
(b) Gemal, A. L.; Luche, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5454–5459.
(14) (a) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4096. (b) Hoye, T. R.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Shao, F.
Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2451–2458. See the Supporting Information for
details.
(15) Lee, E.; Lee, Y. R.; Moon, B.; Kwon, O.; Shim, M. S.; Yun, J. K.
J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1444–1456.
(16) Kurosu, M.; Lin, M.-H.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
12248–12249.
(9) For recent reviews, see: (a) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H. Synlett 2004,
1851–1874. (b) Sasaki, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 80, 856–871.
(c) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 401–426. (d) Fuwa, H.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 83, 1401–1420.
(17) (a) Crispino, G. A.; Jeong, K.-S.; Kolb, H. C.; Wang, Z.-M.; Xu,
D.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3785–3786. (b) Kolb, H. C.;
VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483–2547.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012
3187