Electrochemically Initiated Tandem and Sequential Conjugate Addition Processes
as reported in Table 1). At the end of the electrolysis, the re-
action was prolonged at room temperature under magnetic
stirring until TLC disappearance of 2-CNC6H4CHO. The
mixture was then concentrated under vacuum and purified
as reported above.
c) B. Jiang, T. Rajale, W. Wever, S.-J. Tu, G. Li, Chem.
Asian J. 2010, 5, 2318–2335; d) S. Fustero, M. Sanchez-
Rosello, C. del Pozo, Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 669–
677; e) Y.-F. Han, M. Xia, Curr. Org. Chem. 2010, 14,
379–413.
[3] For recent reviews, see: a) B. A. Frontana-Uribe, R. D.
Little, J. G. Ibanez, A. Palma, R. Vasquez-Medrano,
Green Chem. 2010, 12, 2099–2119; b) M. Okimoto, Y.
Takahashi, Curr. Org. Synth. 2004, 1, 233–251; c) Y. N.
Ogibin, M. N. Elinson, G. I. Nikishin, Russ. Chem. Rev.
2009, 78, 89–140.
[4] a) S. R. Nambiar, K. P. Prathish, G. Karthik, T. P. Rao,
Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3920–3926; b) M. N. Eli-
nson, A. S. Dorofeev, S. K. Feducovich, R. F. Nasybul-
lin, S. V. Gorbunov, G. I. Nikishin, Electrochem.
Commun. 2006, 8, 1567–1571; c) L. Zhang, Z. Zha, Z.
Zhang, L. Yunfeng, Z. Wang, Chem. Commun. 2010,
46, 7196–7198.
Typical Experimental Procedure for
Electrochemically Initiated Tandem Reaction and
One-Pot Sequential Michael Addition (6)
A solution of 1 (1.0 mmol) and 2-CNC6H4CHO (1.0 mmol)
in CH3CN/TEABF4 (0.6 mL/0.08 mmol) was electrolyzed at
room temperature, under galvanostatic conditions (current
density and quantity as reported in Table 3). At the end of
the electrolysis, the reaction was prolonged at room temper-
ature under magnetic stirring until TLC disappearance of 2-
CNC6H4CHO; The Michael acceptor 5a–c (1.05 mmol) was
subsequently added. The mixture was kept under stirring up
to completion of the reaction (TLC disappearance of isoin-
dolinone intermediate), concentrated under vacuum and pu-
rified as reported above.
[5] Z.-Z. Zhang, N.-T. Zhang, L.-M. Hu, Z.-Q. Wei, C.-C.
Zeng, R.-G. Zhong, Y. B. Shec, RSC Adv. 2011, 1,
1383–1388.
[6] M. N. Elinson, A. S. Dorofeev, R. F. Nasybullin, G. I.
Nikishin, Synthesis 2008, 1933–1937.
[7] M. N. Elinson, A. S. Dorofeev, F. M. Miloserdov, A. I.
Ilovaisky, S. K. Feducovich, P. A. Belyakov, G. I. Ni-
kishin, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 591–601.
Typical Experimental Procedure for
Electrochemically Initiated Single-Step Synthesis of
Hemiaminal Derivatives (7)
A solution of 1 (1.0 mmol) and 2-CNC6H4CHO (1.0 mmol)
in CH3CN/TEABF4 (0.6 mL/0.08 mmol) was electrolyzed at
room temperature, under galvanostatic conditions (current
density and quantity as reported in Table 3). At the end of
the electrolysis, the reaction was prolonged at room temper-
ature under magnetic stirring until TLC disappearance of 2-
CNC6H4CHO; acrolein (1.2 mmol) was subsequently added.
The mixture was kept under stirring up to completion of the
reaction (TLC disappearance of isoindolinone intermedi-
ate), concentrated under vacuum and purified as reported
above.
[8] a) M. Angelin, M. Rahm, A. Fischer, T. Brinck, O.
Ramstrom, J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5882–5887; b) M.
Angelin, P. Vongvilai, A. Fischer, O. Ramstrom, Chem.
Commun. 2008, 768–770; c) M. Angelin, A. Fischer, O.
Ramstrom, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3593–3595.
[9] V. More, A. Di Mola, M. Perillo, P. De Capraris, R.
Filosa, A. Pedulo, A. Massa, Synthesis 2011, 3027–3031.
[10] For some naturally occurring substances see: a) V. Fa-
jardo, V. Elango, B. K. Cassels, M. Shamma, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1982, 23, 39–42; b) H. A. Priestap, Phyto-
chemistry 1985, 24, 848–852; c) J.-M. Ferland, C. A. De-
merson, L. G. Humber, Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 361–
365.
[11] a) Z.-P. Zhuang, M.-P. Kung, M. Mu, H. F. Kung, J.
Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 157–168; b) I. Takahashi, T. Ka-
wakami, E. Hirano, H. Yokota, H. Kitajima, Synlett
1996, 353–355; c) I. Pendrak, S. Barney, R. Wittrock,
D. M. Lambert, W. D. Kingsbury, J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 2623–2625; d) E. De Clercq, J. Med. Chem. 1995,
38, 2491–2517; e) F. Pin, S. Comesse, M. Sanselme, A. J.
Daiech, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1975–1977; f) J. S.
Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1905–
1907.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by research grants from MIUR.
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Patrizia Oliva for techni-
cal assistance in 2D NMR experiments.
References
[12] a) L. Palombi, Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 485–488; b) L.
Palombi, M. Feroci, M. Orsini, A. Inesi, Chem.
Commun. 2004, 1846–1847; c) L. Palombi, M. Feroci,
M. Orsini, L. Rossi, A. Inesi, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 2881–2884.
[13] It has to be noted that, using a sub-stoichiometric
amount of Et3N (20%), only 40% of conversion of
starting materials is observed after 24 h (unpublished
results).
[14] a) M. Feroci, M. Orsini, L. Palombi, A. Inesi, Green
Chem. 2007, 9, 323–325; b) T. Caruso, M. Feroci, A.
Inesi, M. Orsini, A. Scettri, L. Palombi, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2006, 348, 1942–1947; c) L. Palombi, M. Feroci,
[1] For selected reviews and discussion on the taxonomy of
one-pot multistep chemical elaborations, see: a) D. E.
Fogg, Eduardo N. dos Santos, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004,
248, 2365–2379; b) A. J. McCarroll, J. C. Walton,
Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2282–2307; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 2224–2248; c) S. F. Mayer, W. Kroutil, K.
Faber, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 332–339; d) L. F.
Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115–136.
[2] For selected recent reviews on multicomponent reac-
tions, see: a) E. Ruijter, R. Scheffelaar, R. V. A. Orru,
Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 6358–6371; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 6234–6246; b) I. Akritopoulou-Zanze,
S. W. Djuric, Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2010, 25, 231–287;
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1717 – 1724
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1723