3966
T. Misawa et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3962–3966
FXR-agonistic activity.10 We evaluated the FXR-agonistic activity of
regio-isomers, that is, the carboxyl group was shifted to the ortho-
(2g) or para-position (2h) from the meta-position, as well as the ef-
fect of esterification of the meta-carboxyl group (2i) (Table 2).
ortho-Isomer 2g and ester derivative 2i showed neither E297G
BSEP-function-promoting nor FXR-agonistic activity, whereas the
para-isomer (2h) showed these activities with similar potency to
the meta-isomer 2d. These results might indicate that the carboxyl
group is similarly recognized by the binding pockets of BSEP and FXR.
As expected, E297G BSEP function enhancers (2a–2f, 2h) also
showed FXR-agonistic activity (Table 2). As shown in Table 2, sub-
stitution of the double bond at the central portion of GW4064 (1)
to an amide bond, that is, compound 2d, had no effect on E297G
BSEP-function-promoting activity, but decreased the potency of
FXR-agonistic activity, that is, the EC50 values for GW4064 (1)
clear FXR-agonistic activity (EC50 values for FXR transcriptional
activation activity of 7d and 7e are >10 and 0.41 lM, respectively,
Table 3).
In summary, we confirmed that bile acids and 2a–2f exhibit
both FXR-agonistic activity and E297G BSEP-function-promoting
activity. Based on SAR considerations, we designed and synthe-
sized reversed-amide derivatives of previously reported GW4064
analogs 2a–2f and identified one of the compounds, 7c, as a selec-
tive BSEP function enhancer. Further SAR study and pharmacolog-
ical evaluation of representative compounds are in progress.
Comparison of the pharmacological effects elicited by a BSEP selec-
tive enhancer such as 7c and BSEP/FXR dual activators such as 2d
should lead to a better understanding of the effect of FXR activa-
tion on PFIC2 treatment.
and 2d are 0.07
lM and 2.5
l
M, respectively. The above-men-
Acknowledgements
tioned SAR analysis of FXR-agonistic activity was based on the
measured EC50 values. However, the efficacy of FXR activation
should also be considered. It is well known that full agonists such
as GW4064 fully activate FXR (100% efficacy), whereas partial ago-
nists show lower levels of maximal transcriptional activation than
the full agonist. As mentioned above, the EC50 value of compound
2d is higher than that of GW4064 (1), and in addition, the efficacy
of FXR transcriptional activation activity of 2d is only 21% com-
pared to that of the full agonist GW4064 (Fig. 2). So, we speculated
that the N-substituted amide-type central portion of the molecule
might be the key to separating E297G BSEP-function-promoting
activity from FXR-agonistic activity. To further investigate the
SAR of the N-substituted amide-type central portion, we designed
and synthesized reversed-amide derivatives, 7a–e. The synthetic
route for the preparation of the reversed-amide derivatives is out-
lined in Scheme 1. Substituted isoxazole 14 was prepared by the
method reported previously. 4-Amino-2-chlorophenol (8) was pro-
tected with a TBS group and condensed with monomethylisophth-
alate to afford amide 10. After deprotection of the hydroxyl group,
the resulting compound 11 was reacted with isoxazole derivative
14 to afford reversed-amide derivative 12, whose saponification
gave 7a. Finally, N-alkylation of 12 by saponification of the esters
13b–e yielded carboxylic acid derivatives 7b–7e.
The work described in this paper was partially supported by
Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from The Ministry of Educa-
tion, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology, Japan, and the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science. We thank Ms. Asami Hattori
for excellent technical support during the biological experiments.
References and notes
1. Gerloff, T.; Stieger, B.; Hagenbuch, B.; Madon, J.; Landmann, L.; Roth, J.;
Hofmann, A. F.; Meier, P. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 10046.
2. Hayashi, H.; Takada, T.; Suzuki, H.; Onuki, R.; Hofmann, A. F.; Sugiyama, Y.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1738, 54.
3. Byrne, J. A.; Strautnieks, S. S.; Mieli-Vergani, G.; Higgins, C. F.; Linton, K. J.;
Thompson, R. J. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 1649.
4. Harris, M. J.; Le Couteur, D. G.; Arias, I. M. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005, 20,
807.
5. Plass, J. R.; Mol, O.; Heegsma, J.; Geuken, M.; de Bruin, J.; Elling, G.; Müller, M.;
Faber, K. N.; Jansen, P. L. J. Hepatol. 2004, 40, 24.
6. Hayashi, H.; Sugiyama, Y. Hepatology 2007, 45, 1506.
7. Hayashi, H.; Sugiyama, Y. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 75, 143.
8. Hayashi, H.; Inamura, K.; Aida, K.; Naoi, S.; Horikawa, R.; Nagasaka, H.;
Takatani, T.; Fukushima, T.; Hattori, A.; Yabuki, T.; Horii, I.; Sugiyama, Y.
9. Misawa, T.; Hayashi, H.; Sugiyama, Y.; Hashomoto, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012.
10. Maloney, P. R.; Parks, D. J.; Haffner, C. D.; Fivush, A. M.; Chandra, G.; Plunket, K.
D.; Creech, K. L.; Moore, L. B.; Wilson, J. G.; Lewis, M. C.; Jones, S. A.; Willson, T.
M. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2971.
11. Kainuma, M.; Makishima, M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Miyachi, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2007, 15, 2587.
12. Makishima, M.; Okamoto, A. Y.; Repa, J. J.; Tu, H.; Learned, R. M.; Luk, A.; Hull,
M. V.; Lustig, K. D.; Mangelsdorf, D. J.; Shan, B. Science 1999, 284, 1362.
13. Parks, D. J.; Blanchard, S. G.; Bledsoe, R. K.; Chandra, G.; Consler, T. G.; Kliewer,
S. A.; Stimmel, J. B.; Willson, T. M.; Zavacki, A. M.; Moore, D. D.; Lehmann, J. M.
Science 1999, 284, 1365.
14. Plass, J. R.; Mol, O.; Heegsma, J.; Geuken, M.; Faber, K. N.; Jansen, P. L.; Müller,
M. Hepatology 2002, 35, 589.
15. Watanabe, M.; Horai, Y.; Houten, S. M.; Morimoto, K.; Sugizaki, T.; Arita, E.;
Mataki, C.; Sato, H.; Tanigawara, Y.; Schoonjans, K.; Itoh, H.; Auwerx, J. J. Biol.
Chem. 2011, 286, 26913.
We evaluated the E297G BSEP-function-promoting activity and
FXR-agonistic activity of the prepared reversed-amide derivatives
7a–7e (Table 3 and Fig. 3). These compounds possessed moderate
to potent E297G BSEP-function-promoting activity. Among the re-
versed-amide derivatives, N-butyl derivative 7c possessed the
most potent activity (accumulation of [3H]TC was reduced to 42%
and 59% at 10 lM and 1 lM, respectively, Table 3 and Fig. 3).
Concerning FXR-agonistic activity, secondary reversed-amide
derivative 7a and N-alkyl reversed-amide derivatives 7b–7c
showed no activity over the concentration range examined (up to
10 lM), whereas N-benzyl/naphthyl derivatives (7d, 7e) showed