and of the norbornene-substituted precursor 20 to 50 nmol
(47% rcy of [18F]23) without significant drop in yields.
In summary, we demonstrated for the first time that [3+2]-
nitrile oxide–alkene/alkyne cycloaddition can be applied for
[18F]-radiolabelling. Novel labelling precursors, nitrile oxide
[18F]2 and imidoyl chloride [18F]21, can be efficiently generated
in situ from easily accessible oxime [18F]3 using different
oxidants. [18F]2 and [18F]21 are valuable building blocks
for rapid and high-yielding preparation of 18F-labelled
compounds under mild reaction conditions (10 min, r80 1C,
aqueous media, no catalyst necessary). The proposed method
is a possible alternative to radiofluorination via copper-
catalyzed/copper-free azide–alkyne ‘‘click’’ reaction. Additionally,
radiofluorination via fast strain-promoted [3+2]-nitrile oxide–
alkyne cycloaddition can be carried out in aqueous media at
room temperature with low amounts of dipolarophile. There-
fore, it should be well suited for fast and simple preparation of
radiolabelled biopolymers.
Scheme 3 Labelling of model dipeptides 19 and 20 using the
radiofluorinated N-hydroxyimidoyl chloride [18F]21. Conditions: (i)
Chloramine T, aq. EtOH, rt, 4 min, then 19 or 20, rt, 10 min. [18F]23
was obtained as a mixture of two regioisomers (ca. 1.5 : 1).
Table 2 Labelling of model dipeptides 19 and 20 using [18F]2 and the
radiofluorinated N-hydroxyimidoyl chloride [18F]21. Dependence on
precursor amounta
This work was supported by EFRE-ZIEL2 program (North
Rhine-Westphalia, Germany).
Precursor amount/nmol
Rcy of [18F]22 (%)
Rcy of [18F]23 (%)
104b
103b
103c
500c
100c
50c
25c
10c
5c
88.3 ꢁ 1.0
36.7 ꢁ 3.0
83.4 ꢁ 2.6
83.7 ꢁ 1.4
76.7 ꢁ 1.8
70.1 ꢁ 12.2
64.3 ꢁ 12.6
—
52.6 ꢁ 1.6
7.6 ꢁ 2.3
82.3 ꢁ 6.5
71.6 ꢁ 2.7
55.9 ꢁ 5.3
46.5 ꢁ 2.1
26.1 ꢁ 8.5
13.4 ꢁ 3.3
5.9 ꢁ 0.5
—
Notes and references
z An important exception is blood flow imaging, for which labelled
small penetrant molecules and ions such as [13N]NH3, [15O]H2O or
82Rb+ are used.
y The crude [18F]3 can be purified, e.g. by RP-SPE extraction.
However, in majority of cases, the purification step did not improve
yields of the following cycloaddition reactions.
55.8 ꢁ 2.3
1c
2.8 ꢁ 1.4
1 For recent reviews see: (a) R. Littich and P. J. H. Scott, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1106 (Angew. Chem., 2012, 124, 1132);
(b) N. J. Long, R. Vilar and A. D. Gee, Angew. Chem., 2008,
120, 9136 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8998).
2 V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless,
Angew. Chem., 2002, 114, 2708 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 2596).
3 J. Marik and J. L. Sutcliffe, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 6681.
4 Few selected examples: (a) R. Bejot, L. Carroll, K. Bhakoo,
J. Declerck and V. Gouverneur, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2012,
20, 324; (b) J. Leyton, L. Iddon, M. Perumal, B. Indrevoll,
M. Glaser, E. Robins, A. J. T. George, A. Cuthbertson,
S. K. Luthra and E. O. Aboagye, J. Nucl. Med., 2011, 52, 1441;
(c) D. Kobus, Y. Giesen, R. Ullrich, H. Backes and B. Neumaier,
Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2009, 67, 1977.
5 L. Campbell-Verduyn, L. Mirfeizi, A. K. Schoonen, R. A. Dierckx,
P. H. Elsinga and B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem., 2011, 123, 11313
(Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 11117).
6 R. Huisgen, Angew. Chem., 1963, 75, 742 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1963, 2, 633).
7 B. D. Zlatopolskiy, R. Kandler, F. M. Mottaghy and B. Neumaier,
Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2012, 70, 184.
8 M. S. Haka, M. R. Kilbourn, G. L. Watkins and
S. A. Toorongian, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 1989, 27, 823.
9 A. M. Jawalekar, E. Reubsaet, F. P. J. T. Rutjes and F. L. van
Delft, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3198.
a
b
Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. With PIFA as an
c
oxidant, see caption of Table 1. With chloramine T as a chlorination
agent: [18F]3 (25–150 MBq) in EtOH (10 mL) was treated at rt with a
solution of chloramine T (0.23 mg, 1 mmol) in H2O (20 mL) followed
after 4 min by the dipolarophile in EtOH (5–100 mL) and the reaction
mixture was stirred at rt for 10 min.
A biological study of [18F]12–14 is in progress and will be
reported in due course.
The amounts of dipolarophiles used (10 mmol, Table 1) are
acceptably low for labelling of small molecules. However,
these amounts are too high, e.g. in the case of peptides and
proteins where precursors are expensive and generally difficult
to separate from the labelled products. Furthermore, high
precursor content can impair the quality of PET-images and
potentially cause adverse effects in patients. Consequently, the
dependency of the labelling yield on the precursor amount was
studied. BCN- and norbornene-substituted b-Ala-Phe-OMe
(19 and 20, respectively) were chosen as model dipolarophiles
(Scheme 3 and Table 2). If [18F]2 was generated by the
oxidation by PIFA or BAIB acceptable rcy of cycloaddition
products could be obtained only with micromolar amounts of
dipolarophiles. Therefore, radiofluorinated N-hydroxy-4-
fluorobenzimidoyl chloride ([18F]21), a more stable synthon
of [18F]2, was used in these experiments. It was prepared in situ
by chlorination of [18F]3 with chloramine T (Scheme 3). This
modification allowed us to minimize the amount of the BCN-
substituted dipolarophile 19 to 5 nmol (56% rcy of [18F]22)
10 J. Dommerholt, S. Schmidt, R. Temming, L. J. A. Hendriks,
F. P. J. T. Rutjes, J. C. M. van Hest, D. J. Lefeber, P. Friedl
and F. L. van Delft, Angew. Chem., 2010, 122, 9612 (Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9422).
11 M. J. Uddin, B. C. Crews, A. L. Blobaum, P. J. Kingsley, D. L.
Gorden, J. O. McIntyre, L. M. Matrisian, K. Subbaramaiah,
A. J. Dannenberg, D. W. Piston and L. J. Marnett, Cancer Res.,
2010, 70, 3618.
12 B. A. Mendelsohn, S. Lee, S. Kim, F. Teyssier, V. S. Aulakh and
M. A. Ciufolini, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 1539.
c
7136 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7134–7136
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012