series of amino acid based10 bifunctional phosphine catalysts
and demonstrated that they are remarkably effective in a wide
range of enantioselective organic transformations.11 By utiliz-
ing L-threonine-derived bifunctional phosphines, we11h re-
cently successfully applied MoritaꢀBaylisꢀHillman (MBH)
carbonates as a C3 synthon in the asymmetric [3 þ 2]
cycloaddition reaction.12 Given the ready availability and
strutural variation of the MBH carbonates, they are undoubt-
edly valuable reaction partners in the cylizations. We envi-
sioned that a phosphine catalyzed [3 þ 2] annulation of MBH
carbonates with maleimides can lead to a facile access to
bicyclic imides bearing three contiguous tertiary stereogenic
centers (Scheme 1). Herein, we document a highly enantio-
selective [3 þ 2] annulation mediated by dipeptide-based
phosphines, furnishing bicyclic imides in excellent yields and
nearly perfect enantioselectivities.
We began our investigation by examining the catalytic
effects of various amino acid derived chiral phosphines in
the [3 þ 2] annulation reaction between MBH carbonate
1a and N-phenyl maleimide 2a, and the results are sum-
marized in Table 1. Different L-Valine derived phosphines
4aꢀd were effective, and the reaction proceeded smoothly
at room temperature (entries 1ꢀ4). The influence of differ-
ent Brønsted acid moieties was found to be signi-
ficant. Employment of amide-bearing 4b led to the forma-
tion of products with high enantioselectivity, but with no
diastereoselectivity (entry 2). Catalyst 4c with a carbamate
group resulted in the formation of a single diastereomer
(entry 3). Turning to our privileged threonine core13 offered
remarkable improvement. In the presence of L-Thr-derived
5, the annulation took place to yield a single diastereomer
with excellent enantioselectivity. The chemical yield of the
reaction, however, was modest (entry 5). To make further
improvement, we next examined dipeptide-based phos-
phines, which were recently developed by us for several
enantioselective annulation processes.11cꢀg To our delight,
L-Thr-L-Val-derived phosphine 6 and L-Thr-L-tert-Leu-
derived phosphine 8worked remarkably well for the reaction,
affording the desired product in excellent yield, in a diaster-
eomerically pure form and with a very high enantiomeric
excess (entries 6 and 8). Contrary to our previous report,11c
L-Thr-D-Val-derived phosphine 7ledtotheproductswitha1:1
diastereomeric ratio (entry 7), which again proved the vital
importance of chirality matching in our stereoselective cataly-
tic processes. Variation of the ester moiety in MBH carbonate
1 offered a slight improvement in ee (entry 9). Different
solvents were examined, and none were found to be superior
to toluene (entries 10ꢀ12).Notably,wewereabletoreducethe
catalyst loading to 5 mol %, and both the chemical yield and
stereoselectivities of the reaction were maintained (entry 13).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the
generality of phosphine 6 catalyzed [3 þ 2] annulations
Figure 1. Selected bioactive bicyclic imides.
Scheme 1. Construction of Bicyclic Imides via Phosphine Cat-
alyzed [3 þ 2] Annulation
(10) For reviews on asymmetric catalysis mediated by amino acids
and synthetic peptides, see: (a) Xu, L.-W.; Luo, J.; Lu, Y. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 1807. (b) Xu, L.-W.; Lu, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008,
6, 2047. (c) Davie, E. A. C.; Mennen, S. M.; Xu, Y.; Miller, S. J. Chem.
Rev. 2007, 107, 5759. (d) Revell, J. D.; Wennemers, H. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2007, 11, 269. (e) Berkessel, A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 409.
(f) Miller, S. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 601. (g) Tsogoeva, S. B. Lett.
Org. Chem. 2005, 2, 208.
(11) For examples reported by us, see: (a) Han, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, F.;
Lu, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 6734. (b) Zhong, F.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.;
Huang, K.-W.; Lu, Y. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1310. (c) Han, X.; Wang, Y.;
Zhong, F.; Lu, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1726. (d) Han, X.; Zhong, F.;
Wang, Y.; Lu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 767. (e) Han, X.; Wang,
S.-X.; Zhong, F.; Lu, Y. Synthesis 2011, 1859. (f) Zhao, Q.; Han, X.; Wei, Y.;
Shi, M.; Lu., Y. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 970. (g) Zhong, F.; Han, X.;
Wang, Y.;Lu, Y.Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 1231. (h) Zhong, F.; Han, X.; Wang, Y.;
Lu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7837. (i) Zhong, F.; Luo, J.; Chen,
G.-Y.; Dou, X.; Lu, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10222.
(12) For other examples of applying MBH adducts in cycloaddition
reactions, see: (a) Tan, B.; Candeias, N. R.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 4672. (b) Deng, H.-P.; Wei, Y.; Shi, M. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2012,354, 783. (c) Peng, J.; Huang, X.; Jiang, L.; Cui, H.-L.; Chen, Y.-C. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 4584. For a recent review on applications of MBH adducts,
see: (d) Liu, T.-Y.; Xie, M.; Chen, Y.-C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4101.
(13) For selected L-Thr-based catalytic systems reported by us, see: (a)
Cheng, L.;Han, X.;Huang, H.;Wong, M. W.;Lu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2007,
4143. (b) Cheng, L.; Wu, X.; Lu, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007,5, 1018. (c) Wu,
X.; Jiang, Z.; Shen, H.-M.; Lu, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 812. (d) Zhu,
Q.; Lu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2235. (e) Dou, X.; Han, X.; Lu, Y.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 85; also see refs 11aꢀ11i.
(8) For selected examples, see: (a) Zhu, G.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao,
D.; Cao, P.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3836. (b) Wilson,
J. E.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1426. (c) Cowen, B. J.;
Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10988. (d) Fang, Y. Q.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5660. (e) Voituriez, A.;
ꢀ
Panossian, A.; Fleury-Bregeot, N.; Retailleau, P.; Marinetti, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14030. (f) Sampath, M.; Loh, T.-P. Chem. Sci.
2010, 1, 739. (g) Voituriez, A.; Pinto, N.; Neel, M.; Retailleau, P.;
Marinetti, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 12541. (h) Xiao, H.; Chai, Z.;
Zheng, C.-W.; Yang, Y.-Q.; Liu, W.; Zhang, J.-K.; Zhao, G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4467. (i) Pinto, N.; Retailleau, P.; Voituriez, A.;
Marinetti, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 1015–1017. (j) Fujiwara, Y.; Fu,
G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12293. For excellent mechanistic
studies, see: (k) Lin, M.; Kang, G.-Y.; Guo, Y.-A.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 398. (l) Xia, Y.; Liang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.;
Jiao, L.; Huang, F.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 3470. (m) Dudding, T.; Kwon, O.; Mercier, E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
3643. (n) Mercier, E.; Fonovic, B.; Henry, C.; Kwon, O.; Dudding, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3617. (o) Liang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xia, Y.; Li, Y.;
Yu, Z.-X. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4361.
(9) For a recent account on our work, see: (a) Wang, S.-X.; Han, X.;
Zhong, F.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y. Synlett 2011, 2766.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX