JOURNAL OF ENZYME INHIBITION AND MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
1543
reaction have been used for determining the initial velocity. The
uncatalysed rates were determined in the same manner and sub-
tracted from the total observed rates. Stock solutions of inhibitors
(10 mM) were prepared in distilled–deionised water and dilutions
up to 1 nM were done thereafter with the assay buffer. Enzyme
and inhibitor solutions were pre-incubated together for 15 min
(standard assay at RT) prior to assay, in order to allow for the for-
mation of the enzyme–inhibitor complex. The inhibition constants
were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using PRISM 3
and the Cheng–Prusoff equation, as reported earlier10,49. All CAs
were recombinant proteins produced as reported earlier by
3. Ventola CL. The Antibiotic Resistance crisis: part 1: causes
and threats. P T 2015;40:277–83.
4. Revie NM, Iyer KR, Robbins N, Cowen LE. Antifungal drug
resistance: evolution, mechanisms and impact. Curr Opin
Microbiol 2018;45:70–6.
5. Brown ED, Wright GD. Antibacterial drug discovery in the
resistance era. Nature 2016;529:336–43.
6. Supuran CT. Bacterial carbonic anhydrases as drug targets:
toward novel antibiotics?. Front Pharmacol 2011;2:1–6.
7. Roemer T, Jiang B, Davison J, et al. Large-scale essential
gene identification in Candida albicans and applications to
antifungal drug discovery. Mol Microbiol 2003;50:167–81.
8. Brown JCS, Nelson J, VanderSluis B, et al. Unraveling the
biology of a fungal meningitis pathogen using chemical
genetics. Cell 2014;159:1168–87.
our groups50–53
.
Cryptococcus neoformans inhibition assays
9. Annunziato G, Pieroni M, Benoni R, et al. Cyclopropane-1,2-
dicarboxylic acids as new tools for the biophysical investiga-
tion of O-acetylserine sulfhydrylases by fluorimetric methods
and saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR. J Enzyme
Inhib Med Chem 2016;31:78–87.
10. Annunziato G, Angeli A, D’Alba F, et al. Discovery of new
potential anti-infective compounds based on carbonic anhy-
drase inhibitors by rational target-focused repurposing
approaches. ChemMedChem 2016;11:1876–914.
The growth inhibition of C. neoformans ATCC 6895 in presence of
compounds 12–15, 28, 30, and 31, and ETZ as a positive control,
was evaluated in YNB medium (2% glucose, 1 ꢂ Difco yeast nitro-
gen base without amino acids), pH 7.0. Yeasts were pre-grown at
37 ꢁC on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plates for 48 h. The com-
pounds were resuspended in hot DMSO (100 ꢁC) according to
their solubility (concentrations ranging from 300 to 100 mM).
Growth assays in liquid medium were performed on 96-wells
microtiter plates. Yeast cells (1.5 ꢂ 106 cells/mL) were incubated in
200 lL of YNB with 3 mM compounds in ambient air for 72 h at
30 ꢁC, 160 rpm. Three wells for each condition were prepared
together with controls (medium alone and medium with DMSO).
Growth was measured spectrophotometrically, recording the
optical density at 540 nm (OD540) before (t0) and after incubation.
After baseline correction, percent growth inhibition was calculated
using the following formula: 100 – [(OD540 at 72 h – OD540 at t0)/
(OD540 in 3% DMSO at 72 h – OD540 in 3% DMSO at t0) ꢂ 100]. Six
independent experiments were performed. For growth assay in a
solid medium, 200 cells of C. neoformans were spread on YNB
agar supplemented with selected compounds at a concentration
of 3 mM and incubated at 37 ꢁC in air and 5.5% CO2 atmosphere.
After 120 h the colony forming units (CFUs) were counted. Percent
growth inhibition was calculated in comparison to controls as pre-
viously described54. Three plates for each condition were assayed
in two independent experiments. The average colony diameter
per plate was determined from microscope images of 20 ran-
domly selected colonies (NIS-Elements D 3.00, SP6 Imaging soft-
ware). Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 5
software. A p values <0.05 was considered significant.
~
11. Magalhaes J, Annunziato G, Franko N, et al. Integration of
enhanced sampling methods with saturation transfer differ-
ence experiments to identify protein druggable pockets.
J Chem Inf Model 2018;58:710–23.
12. Pieroni M, Annunziato G, Beato C, et al. Rational design, syn-
thesis, and preliminary structure-activity relationships of
a-substituted-2-phenylcyclopropane carboxylic acids as
inhibitors of salmonella typhimurium O-acetylserine sulfhy-
drylase. J Med Chem 2016;59:2567–78.
13. Pieroni M, Azzali E, Basilico N, et al. Accepting the invitation
to open innovation in malaria drug discovery: synthesis, bio-
logical evaluation, and investigation on the structure-activity
relationships of benzo[b]thiophene-2-carboxamides as anti-
malarial agents. J Med Chem 2017;60:1959–70.
14. Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Bioorg Med
Chem Lett 2010;20:3467–74.
15. Capasso C, Supuran CT. An overview of the selectivity and
efficiency of the bacterial carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Curr
Med Chem 2015;22:2130–9.
16. Capasso C, Supuran CT. Anti-infective carbonic anhydrase
inhibitors: a patent and literature review. Expert Opin Ther
Pat 2013;23:693–704.
17. Lionetto MG, Caricato R, Giordano ME, Schettino T. The com-
plex relationship between metals and carbonic anhydrase:
new insights and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1–14.
18. Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases as drug targets-an over-
view. Curr Top Med Chem 2007;7:825–33.
Disclosure statement
The authors do not declare conflict of interest.
ORCID
19. Xu Y, Feng L, Jeffrey PD, et al. Structure and metal exchange
in the cadmium carbonic anhydrase of marine diatoms.
Nature 2008;452:56–61.
Claudiu T. Supuran
20. Supuran CT. Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases.
Biochem J 2016;473:2023–32.
21. Chegwidden WR, Dodgson SJ, Spencer IM. The roles of car-
bonic anhydrase in metabolism, cell growth and cancer in
animals. In: EXS. 2000:343–63.
22. Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applica-
tions for inhibitors and activators. Nat Rev Drug Discov
2008;7:168–81.
References
1. Baym M, Stone LK, Kishony R. Multidrug evolutionary strat-
egies to reverse antibiotic resistance. Science 2016;351:
aad3292.
2. Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide:
causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 2004;10:S122–9.