D. Li et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
3
line, and Bel-7402 hepatoma cell line) were determined by MTT
assay and compared with NO donor 16, oridonin (7), parent com-
pounds (9 and 14) and positive control Taxol in each panel
(Table 1). All the synthetic target molecules 10a–f and 15a–f were
more potent than oridonin and the parent compound (9 or 14).
Target hybrid compounds were very sensitive to Bel-7402 cell line
might, at least to some extent, contribute to the strong
cytotoxicity.
Anticancer drugs were known to interact with cells leading to
cell growth arrest or cell death. The cell cycle had four functional
phases: S phase where DNA replication occurred; M phase (mito-
sis) where DNA and cellular components were divided to form
two daughter cells; G2 phase, between S and M, where cells pre-
pared for mitosis; G1 phase after mitosis and before S phase, where
cells committed and prepared for another round of DNA and cellu-
lar replication.29 Many anticancer compounds exerted their growth
inhibitory effect either by arresting the cell cycle at a particular
checkpoint of cell cycle or by induction of apoptosis or a combined
effect of both cycle block and apoptosis. Furthermore the regula-
tion of the cell cycle and apoptosis was considered to be effective
cancer therapeutic methods.30 To shed more light on the mecha-
nism responsible for the anticancer effect of NO donor/spirolac-
tone-type 6,7-seco-ent-kaurane diterpenoid hybrids, 15d was
examined for their influence on the cell cycle progression. In this
with IC50 values ranging from 0.86 to 1.83
Taxol. While, in CaEs-17 cancer cells, the antiproliferative activity
was not so good with IC50 values of 3.75–6.26 M. In K562 and
lM and even superior to
l
MGC-803 cell lines, target compounds showed similar potency
and the IC50 values were between those of Bel-7402 and CaEs-17
cell lines.
The preliminary SARs showed that when R2 was aromatic
groups o-C6H4 (10b, 10d, 10f, 15b, 15d, and 15f), the activity was
stronger than those with alkyl groups (CH2)2 (10a, 10c, 10e, 15a,
15c, and 15e). 10d and 15d, correspondingly, exhibited the most
promising antiproliferative activity of NO donor/1-oxo spirolac-
tone-type 6,7-seco-kaurane diterpenoid hybrids 10a–f and NO
donor/1-OAc spirolactone-type 6,7-seco-kaurane diterpenoid
hybrids 15a–f against all the four tested cell lines. The IC50 values
assay, Bel-7402 cells were treated with 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 lM of
compound 15d. Controls were treated with vehicle DMSO. In order
to determine the effects on the cell cycle progression, we detected
the DNA content of cell nuclei by flow cytometry (Fig. 3). Treat-
ment with 15d led to a dose-dependent accumulation of cells in
the S phase with a concomitant decrease in the population of cells
in G1 and G2 phases. Cells at S phase resulted in accumulation of
were 1.97 and 1.74
against CaEs-17 cells, 1.63 and 1.16
and 0.93 and 0.86 M against Bel-7402 cells, respectively. Clear
lM against K562 cell line, 4.12 and 3.75
lM
l
M against MGC-803 cell line,
l
morphological changes were observed in cells exposed to the com-
pounds (Fig. 2). Under light microscopy, control cells appeared
with a regular shape, whereas after incubation with 15d, Bel-
7402 cells showed a remarkable reduction in cell number and cell
size. Based on the above results, the most potent NO-releasing
hybrid 15d was selected for further mechanism study in Bel-
Table 2
NO-releasing ability of hybrids 10a–f and 15a–f (lM)
7402 cells and 0.1 lM of Taxol was used as positive control (data
shown in Supplementary material).
Compd
10 min
20 min
30 min
40 min
50 min
60 min
10a
10b
10c
10d
10e
10f
15a
15b
15c
15d
15e
15f
16
6.71
7.66
2.91
3.52
2.80
5.65
8.84
6.88
5.37
6.10
11.91
10.46
12.25
9.14
11.72
3.58
3.47
0.99
6.16
9.14
7.32
6.99
7.15
12.88
8.42
15.57
12.36
14.40
5.68
4.30
4.91
10.54
10.15
12.46
12.46
12.63
18.26
12.74
19.26
13.23
13.28
8.08
9.96
6.92
13.17
11.79
14.83
16.66
16.88
22.02
16.27
24.10
15.81
14.82
12.12
12.45
15.54
16.42
13.44
18.68
24.74
22.09
26.83
21.54
25.89
19.37
16.89
18.82
17.11
20.09
19.87
16.94
22.63
28.92
25.77
31.68
24.67
27.04
The key requirement for any therapeutic effectiveness of the NO
releasing prodrugs was their ability to undergo biotransformation
to release NO, either enzymatically or nonenzymatically. The NO-
releasing ability of the hybrids 10a–f and 15a–f were determined
by Griess assay. The levels of nitrate/nitrite in the lysates were
determined at 100 lM over duration of 1 h and measured at the
time point of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min. As shown in Table 2,
the concentrations of released NO for all synthetic hybrids
increased with time and were more than 15
of 60 min. The most effective compounds 10d and 15d produced
17.11 and 25.77 M of NO, respectively. High NO releasing ability
lM at the time point
l
Figure 2. Effects of 15d on Bel-7402 cell morphology. Cells were treated with compound 15d for 48 h, then morphology was observed under light microscopy at 200
magnification: (a) negative control, (b) positive control (5 M Taxol), (c) cells treated with 5 M 15d, (d) 1.25 M 15d, (e) 0.3125 M 15d.
l
l
l
l