Y.-S. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5517–5522
5521
Figure 4. HPLC profiles of Pb(II)-4 (top) and 203Pb-4 (bottom).
Table 1
In conclusion, the peptidomimetic
a
vb3 integrin antagonist
Binding of 111In-1, 67Ga-1 and 203Pb-4 to purified
avb3 integrin
(IAC) was conjugated to NODA-GA and DOTA-GA and successfully
radiolabeled with 111In, 67Ga and 203Pb. This promising preliminary
data is fueling further investigation of NODA-GA-IAC and DOTA-
GA-IAC conjugates for targeting tumor associated angiogenesis
Bound (%)
No integrin (111In-1 only)
5.3
66.0
88.1
5.4
0.5
l
M Integrin + 111In-1 (0.47
l
M)
M)
M Integrin + 111In-1 + IAC (20
1
1
l
l
M Integrin + 111In-1 (0.47
l
and
avb3 integrin positive tumors using PET and SPECT imaging.
l
M)
Other potential applications include the use of radionuclides such
No integrin (67Ga-1 only)
2.1
10.7
25.5
43.6
1.6
as 90Y, 177Lu and 212Pb for radiotherapy.
0.5 l l
M Integrin + 67Ga-1 (0.45
M)
1
2
2
l
l
l
M Integrin + 67Ga-1 (0.45
M Integrin + 67Ga-1 (0.45
lM)
Acknowledgement
lM)
M Integrin + 67Ga-1 + IAC (20
l
M)
No integrin (203Pb-4 only)
0.3
10.9
20.0
33.4
0.3
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Pro-
gram of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer
Research.
0.5 l l
M Integrin + 203Pb-4 (0.5
M)
1
2
2
l
l
l
M Integrin + 203Pb-4 (0.5
M Integrin + 203Pb-4 (0.5
lM)
lM)
M Integrin + 203Pb-4 + IAC (20
l
M)
Supplementary data
DOTA-GA conjugates, 111In, 67Ga and 203Pb were employed to
demonstrate facile formation of complexes with these radionuc-
lides. The NODA-GA conjugate 1 was efficiently radiolabeled
(>90%) with 111In and 67Ga within 30 min (Fig. 2A and B, respec-
tively). The radiolabeling of the DOTA-GA conjugate 4 with 203Pb
was equally efficient (Fig. 2C). Non-radioactive Ga(III)-1 and
Pb(II)-4 were also synthesized in order to characterize the radio-
labeled 67Ga and 203Pb complexes.25,26 Figs. 3 and 4 demonstrate
HPLC profiles of the mixture containing both Ga(III)-1 and 67Ga-1;
and Pb(II)-4 and 203Pb-4, respectively.
Supplementary data (materials and methods, general synthesis
and radiolabeling conditions) associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. Takagi, J.; Springer, R. A. Immunol. Rev. 2002, 186, 141.
2. Haubner, R.; Wester, H. J.; Burkhart, F.; Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.; Weber,
W.; Goodman, S. L.; Kessler, H.; Schwaiger, M. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 326.
3. Haubner, R.; Wester, H. J.; Weber, W. A.; Mang, C.; Ziegler, S. I.; Goodman, S. L.;
Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.; Kessler, H.; Schwaiger, M. Cancer Res. 2001, 61,
1781.
4. von Hagen, P. M.; Breeman, W. A. P.; Bernard, H. F.; Schaar, M.; Mooij, C. M.;
Srinivasan, A.; Schmidt, M. A.; Krenning, E. P.; de Jong, M. Int. J. Cancer. 2000, 8,
186.
5. Hood, J. D.; Bednarski, M.; Frausto, R.; Guccione, S.; Reisfeld, R. A.; Xiang, R.;
Cheresh, D. A. Science 2002, 296, 2402.
6. Burnett, C. A.; Xie, J.; Quijano, J.; Shen, Z.; Hunter, F.; Bur, M.; Li, K. C. P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 3763.
7. Jang, B. S.; Lim, E.; Park, S. H.; Shin, I. S.; Danthi, S. N.; Hwang, I. S.; Le, N.; Yu, S.;
Xie, J.; Li, K. C. P.; Carrasquillo, J. A.; Paik, C. H. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007, 34, 363.
8. Ikotun, O. F.; Lapi, S. E. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 3, 599.
9. Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110,
2858.
10. Meyer, G. J.; Macke, H. R.; Schuhmacher, J.; Knapp, W. H.; Hoffman, T. J. Eur. J.
Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2004, 31, 1097.
11. Craig, A. S.; Helps, I. M.; Jankowski, K. J.; Parker, D.; Beeley, N. R. A.; Boyce, B. A.;
Eaton, M. A. W.; Millican, A. T.; Millar, K.; Phipps, A.; Rhind, S. K.; Harrison, A.;
Walker, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 794.
A radioimmunoassay was performed to assess the binding abil-
ity of the radiolabeled NODA-GA and DOTA-GA conjugates with
a
vb3 integrin. The 111In-labeled 1 (2 ꢀ 106 cpm, 0.47
l
M), 67Ga-la-
beled 1 (5 ꢀ 105 cpm, 0.45
l
M) or 203Pb-labeled 4 (3 ꢀ 105 cpm,
0.5
man
for 3 h at 37 °C. For non-specific binding, excess IAC (20
lM) was incubated with 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 lM of purified hu-
a
vb3 integrin (MW 237,000) in a total volume of 25
lL PBS
lM) was
added to the reaction mixture to block binding. The reaction mix-
ture was then separated on a 10 mL Sephadex G50 column using
PBS as eluent. Fractions (0.5 mL) were collected and subsequently
counted in a c-counter. As indicated in Table 1, the labeled conju-
gates bound the integrin to varying degrees. The binding of 111In-1
was greatest followed by 67Ga-1 and then 203Pb-4. In addition,
binding was blocked ꢁ95% by the addition of a 10 to 20-fold molar
excess of the cold IAC to the reaction solution indicating specific
binding of the labeled conjugates. Furthermore, it is worth noting
12. Knetsch, P. A.; Petrik, M.; Griessinger, C. M.; Rangger, C.; Fani, M.; Kesenheimer,
C.; von Guggenberg, E.; Pichler, B. J.; Virgolini, I.; Decristoforo, C.; Haubner, R.
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2011, 28, 1303.
13. Kumar, K.; Magerstaedt, M.; Gansow, O. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989,
3, 145.
that the reactivity of the 111In-1 with
than that reported for 111In-DOTA-IAC (72%).7
avb3 integrin (88%) is higher