Table 1. Optimization of the Domino Reaction onto Enamide 1a in the Presence of Benzyl Azide 2a
entry
equiv of 2a
acid (equiv)
solvent
timea (h)
yield 3ab (%)
yield 4ab (%)
yield 5ab (%)
1
2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
3
TfOH (1.2)
TfOH (1.2)
TfOH (1.2)
TfOH (0.2)
TfOH (3.1)
TfOH (0.85)
TfOH (1.5)
TfOH (1.2)
TfOH (1.2)
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
CH2Cl2
2
48
18
0
0.25
5
14
11
3
15
0
4
5
12
24
5
2
0
0
6
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
2
11
22
7
2
7
trace
trace
59
8c
9d
10
11
12
2
trace
0
2
0
BF3 Et2O (1.2)
2
0
0
3
AlCl3 (1.2)
TfOH (1.2)
2
trace
trace
trace
trace
7
a Reaction time after complete reaction between benzyl azide and acid (c ≈ 0.2 mol Lꢀ1). b Yield of pure product after purification by column
3
chromatography. c Reaction mixture: c ≈ 0.067 mol Lꢀ1
.
d Reaction was carried out at ꢀ78 °C before slowly increasing the temperature up to 20 °C.
3
In our quest to generate libraries for biological screening,7
we focused our attention on the construction of nitrogen-
fused tetrahydroquinoline cores via a domino reaction
starting from benzyl azides and easily accessible enamides.
Azides are involved in a wide array of reactions especially
for the construction of new carbonꢀnitrogen bonds; they
have received much attention in recent years.8 Among these
Initially, we examined the reaction with benzyl azide 2a
(1.1 equiv) in the presence of triflic acid (1.2 equiv) in
toluene at0 °C for 15min (Table 1, entry 1). After complete
disappearance of the starting material, enamide 1a
(1 equiv) was added to the solution before stirring at room
temperature for 2 h. The reaction afforded the desired
pyrido-fused tetrahydroquinoline 3a (48% yield) and the
byproduct 4a (18% yield). The stereochemistry cis in 3a
was clearly determined by relevant 1H NOE NMR
experiments.11 However, the stereochemistry of 4a could
not be confirmed. Mechanistically, the presence of 3a and
4a derivatives could be explained as depicted in Scheme 1.
Upon protonation, benzyl azide 2a afforded intermediate
species which underwent rearrangement to form an imi-
nium ion with concomitant loss of molecular nitrogen.9
The latter was trapped by nucleophilic addition ofenamide
1a, creating the first new carbonꢀcarbon bond.12 After
subsequent cyclization onto the newly formed N-sulfony-
liminium ion via a PictetꢀSpengler reaction, the second
carbonꢀcarbon bond was performed, affording 3a as a cis
diastereoisomer. Alternatively, instead of the cyclization
step and from the N-sulfonyliminium ion, a nucleophilic
attack of a second enamide 1a could occur, leading to
derivative 4a.
ꢀ
studies, Aube and co-workers underlined an unprecedented
reactivity of benzyl azides under acidic conditions.9 They
reported the acid-promoted rearrangement of alkyl azides
providing iminium intermediates which could be trapped by
carbonyl compounds in a variant of the Mannich reaction.
Recently, Zhai’s group described the construction of a range
of tetrahydro-5H-indolo[3,2-c]quinolines via a benzyl azide-
to-iminium rearrangement followed by two sequential
PictetꢀSpengler reactions.10 Consequently, we decided to
study this alkyl azide-to-iminium rearangement in presence
of enamide for the direct construction of original nitrogen-
fused tetrahydroquinoline scaffolds.
(6) Witherup, K. M.; Ransom, R. W.; Graham, A. C.; Bernard,
A. M.; Salvatore, M. J.; Lumma, W. C.; Anderson, P. S.; Pitzenberger,
S. M.; Varga, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6682–6685.
(7) (a) Gigant, N.; Gillaizeau, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3304–3307. (b)
Gigant, N.; Claveau, E.; Bouyssou, P.; Gillaizeau, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
844–847. (c) Gigant, N.; Dequirez, G.; Retailleau, P.; Gillaizeau, I.;
Dauban, P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 90–94. (d) Claveau, E.; Gillaizeau,
I.; Kalinowska, J.; Bouyssou, P.; Coudert, G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
2911–2914.
Different parameters were thus investigated (Table 1).
Much lower yields were observed by modifying the reac-
tion time (entries 2 and 3), the proportion of the different
reactants (entries 4ꢀ7) or the dilution (entry 8), despite the
(8) For recent reviews on the reactivity of azides, see: (a) Driver, T. G.
€
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3831–3846. (b) Brase, S.; Gil., C.; Knepper,
K.; Zimmermann, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5176–5186.
(9) Desai, P.; Schildknegt, K.; Agrios, K. A.; Mossman, C.; Milligan,
(11) See the Supporting Information.
(12) Matsubara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 292–
ꢀ
G. L.; Aube, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7226–7232.
(10) Song, Z.; Zhao, Y.-M.; Zhai, H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6331–6333.
301.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4623