J. R. Johnston, F. G. West / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 5479–5482
5481
nones 5b and 5c, it was found beneficial to include a small amount
of added acetone to the reaction mixture to enhance the rate of
microwave heating.14
Importantly, in all examples only one regioisomer was detected.
While regioselectivity has been described in a few early examples
involving unsymmetrical reactants,2 these results indicate a here-
tofore unappreciated generality of this phenomenon for this trans-
formation. Evidence for the indicated regiochemistry includes the
following. In the case of DCC adduct 7b, a characteristic difference
in chemical shift (4.68 vs 3.60 ppm) for the cyclohexyl methine
protons was noted (Fig. 3) allowing for tentative determination
of the location of the cyclohexyl substituent in adducts derived
from 6c and 6e. Thus, in the case of 7c, the single cyclohexyl
methine resonance appears at 4.82 ppm, consistent with substitu-
tion on the ring nitrogen. Furthermore, a 3-bond HMBC correlation
was detected between the cyclohexyl methine proton and the car-
bonyl carbon (possible for 7c but not for its hypothetical regio-
isomer 8c) and an NOE correlation was observed between the
ortho phenyl protons and the methyl protons. Regiochemistry in
other cases was assigned by analogy. It should be noted that the
NOE correlation mentioned above not only supported the regio-
chemical assignment, but also strongly suggested a (Z) geometry
for the exocyclic imino group. This geometry for a C@NPh moiety
was also observed in the X-ray crystal structure for diphenylcarbo-
diimide adduct 7j,2b,7,15 and likely arises from avoidance of unfa-
vorable steric interactions between the two nitrogen substituents.
The mechanism of the cycloaddition process remains uncertain
at this time. Two mechanistic extremes are concerted [4+2]-cyclo-
addition and stepwise nucleophilic attack by one nitrogen atom at
the electrophilic ketene carbon, followed by electrocyclic ring-clo-
sure (Scheme 3). In the case of alkyl aryl carbodiimides 6c and 6d,
the alkyl-substituted nitrogen is consistently incorporated into the
ring (R3). Preferential bonding between this more nucleophilic
nitrogen and the former ketene carbon atom suggests that the
cycloaddition may proceed with a significant polar component.
On the other hand, the difference in relative nucleophilicity of
the two carbodiimide nitrogens of 6e is likely to be negligible,
and selective placement of the t-butyl substituent on the exocyclic
Scheme 3. Mechanism and regioselectivity.
imino nitrogen may result from avoidance of unfavorable steric
interactions in the transition state for addition. Reaction of 1-t-bu-
tyl-3-phenylcarbodiimide11f,g,16 would provide an opportunity to
more fully explore the relative importance of the electronic and
steric factors that appear to influence regioselectivity, and these
studies are planned for future publication.
Cycloaddition of thermally generated acylketenes with carbo-
diimides offers a convergent and expedient route to the iminoox-
azinone skeleton. Examination of a series of unsymmetrically
substituted reaction partners has shown that high levels of regiose-
lectivity can be expected from this process, with the nitrogen atom
that is less nucleophilic or more sterically encumbered occupying a
position on the exocyclic imino group. Microwave heating allows
for clean conversion in relatively short reaction times. Further
applications of this work, including the examination of other
mixed carbodiimides and the exploration of alternative acylketene
precursors, will be described in due course.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank NSERC for generous funding of the project,
and Dr. Michael Ferguson (University of Alberta X-ray Crystallogra-
phy Laboratory) for obtaining the structure of 7j.
References and notes
1. (a) March, L. C.; Romanchick, W. A.; Bajwa, G. S.; Joulié, M. M. J. Med. Chem.
1973, 16, 337–342; (b) Bereznak, J. F.; Marshall, PCT Int. Appl. (2000), WO
2000051992 A1 20000908.
2. (a) Lacey, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 845–849; (b) Lacey, R. N.; Ward, W. R. J. Chem.
Soc. 1958, 2134–2141.
3. Trifonov, L. S.; Orahovats, A. S. Helv. Chim. Acta 1986, 69, 1585–1587.
4. May, E. L. J. Med. Chem. 1967, 10, 505–506.
5. Capuano, L.; Kirn, H. R.; Zander, R. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 2456–2461.
6. Lisovenko, N. Y.; Maslivets, A. N.; Aliev, Z. G. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 43, 117–
120.
7. Sato, M.; Ogasawara, H.; Kato, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 2602–2608.
8. (a) Kappe, C. O.; Färber, G.; Wentrup, C.; Kollenz, G. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
7078–7083; (b) Saidi, K.; Shaterian, H.; Aghaei, D. Heterocycl. Commun. 2000, 6,
93–96.
9. Shelkov, R.; Nahmany, M.; Melman, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8975–8992.
10. Gudipati, I. R.; Sadasivam, D. V.; Birney, D. M. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 275–
277.
11. (a) Palomo, C.; Mestres, R. Synthesis 1981, 373–374; (b) Schlama, T.;
Gouverneur, V.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7047–7048; (c)
Babcock, J. R.; Sita, L. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5585–5586; (d) Anderson, J.
C.; Bou-Moreno, R. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9182–9186; (e) Kong, K. H.; Tan, C. K.;
Lin, X.; Lam, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1476–1486; (f) Kim, S.; Yi, K. Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1661–1664; (g) Olimpieri, F.; Volonterio, A.;
Bellucci, M. C.; Zanda, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 6179–6188.
12. Cramer, N.; Buchweitz, M.; Laschat, S.; Frey, W.; Baro, A.; Mathieu, D.; Richter,
C.; Schwalbe, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2488–2503.
13. Vu, V. A.; Bérillon, L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6847–6850.
Figure 3. Evidence for regiochemical assignment.