781
Table 1. Examination of various trihaloalkanes as an activatora
Table 2. Enantioselective borohydride reduction of aliphatic
O
OH
ketonesa
(R,R)-1a (5 mol%)
Haloalkane (20-25 mol%)
(S,S)-1a (5 mol%)
CH3CCl3 (20 mol%)
O
OH
NaBH4, Alcohol(s)
THF
R
R
2a
3a
NaBH4, MeOH
THF
2
3
Entry
Haloalkane
Yield/%
ee/%
OH
OH
OH
1
2
3
4b
5b
6
®
quant.
85
97
94
51
98
75
91
13
40
28
29
29
45
64
85
CHCl3
CHBr3
CHl3
85% yieldb
88% ee
16 h
83% yieldb
81% ee
72 h
84% yield
87% ee
24 h
OBn
3c
CCl4
3a
3b
OH
OH
OH
CH2Cl2
CH3CCl3
CH3CCl3
7
8c
83% yield
86% ee
22 h
85% yieldc
80% ee
24 h
63% yieldd
90% ee
48 h
aReaction conditions: ketone 2a (0.25 mmol), (R,R)-1a (12.5 ¯mol,
5 mol %), NaBH4 (0.38 mmol, 1.5 equiv), EtOH (0.38 mmol), THFA
(5.25 mmol), haloalkane (50 mmol, 20 mol %), THF (6.5 mL) at 0 °C
for 24 h. Yields are of material isolated by silica gel chromatography.
Enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC analysis of
1-naphthoate derivative (Chiralpak IB). bHaloalkane (63 mmol,
25 mol %). cReaction conditions: NaBH4 (0.50 mmol, 2.0 equiv),
MeOH (3.0 mmol, 12 equiv), CH3CCl3 (50 mmol, 20 mol %), THF
(6.5 mL) at ¹20 °C for 24 h.
3d
OH
3e
3f
3i
OH
OH
Ph
97% yielde
80% ee
12 h
65% yieldf
61% ee
22 h
16% yield
85% ee
Ph
96 h
3g
3h
aReaction conditions: ketone 2 (0.25 mmol), (S,S)-1a (12.5 ¯mol,
5 mol %), NaBH4 (0.50 mmol, 2.0 equiv), MeOH (3.0 mmol, 12 equiv),
CH3CCl3 (50 mmol, 20 mol %) at ¹20 °C. Yields are of material
isolated by silica gel chromatography. Enantiomeric excess was
determined by HPLC analysis of 1-naphthoate derivative (Chiralpak
IB). Absolute configuration of 3a was determined by specific optical
rotation. bCH3CCl3 (75 mmol, 30 mol %) was used. c(R,R)-1a was used
and the modified borohydride (NaBH4 0.75 mmol and MeOH
4.5 mmol in THF 6 mL) was added in three portions every 3 h. dThe
reaction was run at ¹30 °C. e(R,R)-1a, NaBH4 (0.38 mmol, 1.5 equiv),
MeOH (2.3 mmol, 9 equiv) were used. The yield was based on GC
trihaloalkanes were screened as an activator for the cobalt(II)
complex 1a in the presence of a borohydride modified by EtOH
and tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA) in THF. Without any
haloalkane, 1-adamantyl methyl ketone (2a) was reduced to
1-(1-adamantyl)ethanol (3a) with only 13% ee (Table 1,
Entry 1). As a result of examining the effect by halogen atoms,
chlorine was found to work the most effectively among the three
haloforms, i.e., CHCl3, CHBr3, and CHI3 (Entries 2-4). Several
carbon chloride derivatives, such as CCl4 and CH2Cl2 (Entries 5
and 6 and see Supporting Information14), were next examined.
Most of them did not improve the enantioselectivity and were
less effective or slightly better than CHCl3. When 1,1,1-
trichloroethane was employed as the activator, the enantio-
selective reduction effectively proceeded to provide the reduced
product 3a in 75% yield with 64% ee (Entry 7). After
optimization of the reaction conditions, the enantioselectivity
was enhanced with replacement of the borohydride modifier
from EtOH/THFA to MeOH. The corresponding alcohol 3a was
obtained in 91% yield with 85% ee at ¹20 °C (Entry 8).
The optimized conditions were then successfully applied to
the catalytic enantioselective borohydride reduction of various
aliphatic ketones. The present scope is shown in Table 2.
Tertiary alkyl ketones were reduced into the corresponding
alcohols 3 with over 80% ee. The adamantyl ketones 2a-2c and
noradamantyl ketone 2d were converted into the optically active
alcohols with 81-88% ee. The methyl 1-methylcyclohexyl
ketone (2e) was also an applicable substrate; the product 3e
was obtained in 85% yield with 80% ee. Though the reactivities
for the reductions of the more bulky substrates 2f and 2g were
low, high enantioselectivities were also observed; especially,
3-methyl-3-phenyl-2-butanol (3f) was obtained with 90% ee.
The simple tertiary alkyl ketone 2h was smoothly converted into
3h with 80% ee. When the secondary alkyl ketone 2i was
employed in the same system, a moderate enantioselectivity was
observed (61% ee).
f
conversion. (S,S)-1b was used.
An ESI-MS analysis of the reaction mixture of the cobalt(II)
complex/borohydride was performed in the presence of 1,1,1-
trichloroethane to reveal the structure of the reactive intermedi-
ate (Figure 2). After the solution color of the cobalt catalyst
changed from yellow (cobalt(II) complex) to red after treatment
with the borohydride in the presence of 1,1,1-trichloroethane,
a peak at m/z 877 was observed in the negative mode.
It could be assigned as the cobalt(III) complex containing
dichloroethyl group on the axial site based on the previous
observation in the original CHCl3 solvent system. Also, the
isotopic pattern corresponding to the molecule containing two
chlorine atoms was definitely observed, whereas in the positive
mode, the peak at m/z 879 or neighborhood derived from
dichloroethyl-cobalt was not detected. The peak observed at
m/z 843 could be assigned as (M+ + CH2CCl; 782 + 35 +
24 + 2), and these observations could be explained as follows:
Initially, the dichloroethylcobalt(III) 4a could be derived from
the original cobalt(II) complex with 1,1,1-trichloroethane in the
presence of the borohydride, similar to the original cobalt
catalyst system with chloroform. The proton of the terminal
methyl on dichloromethyl group should be acidic enough due to
the two chlorine atoms on the ¡-position and cobalt(III) atom on
the ¢-position to be removed in the reaction system (Scheme 2).
The chloride was then released. The molecular weight of the
resulting structure 5a, 1-chlorovinyl group on cobalt(III) com-
Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 780-782
© 2012 The Chemical Society of Japan