group is one of the most difficult tasks in carbanion chem-
istry. Although some reactions of such carbanions have been
reported,6 practical alkylation of trifluoroethyl carbanions
and their synthetic application remain important synthetic
challenges. Since our research group has recently focused on
the synthetic utility of monofluoromethylated phenylsulfone
derivatives such as FBSM7,8 and FBDT,9 we next became
interested in 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl phenylsulfones, CF3CH-
RSO2Ph 1,10À12as precursors of trifluoroethyl carbanions
CF3CRHÀ. In addition to the utility of the phenylsulfonyl
group in synthetic organic chemistry, the trifluoroethyl
phenylsulfonyl moiety itself is of great importance as a key
component in biologically active compounds, for example,
stromelysin-1, a potent inhibitor of MMP-3.13
sulfone derivatives 3 that feature a tertiary or a quaternary
trifluoromethylated carbon center. The products obtained
are of great interest not only as components of biologically
active compounds but also as precursors of difluoromethy-
lated compounds after three successive reductive treatments
(Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Strategies for Allylation of Trifluoroethyl Sulfones 1
An early study by Uneyama and Momota in 1989 revealed
that alkylation of the phenylsulfonyl 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl
carbanion is problematic.12 After careful investigation, 3
equiv of LDA and tetraethylammonium chloride in THF-
HMPA plus 10 equiv of methyl iodide provided the methy-
lation product in 80% yield. However, allyl iodide gave the
allylated 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl phenylsulfone in only 12%
yield and other alkylating agents (ethyl iodide, benzyl
bromide) failed to react. In 2011, we reported a new
approach toward R-carbonyl CF3-bearing quaternary cen-
ters based on a palladium-catalyzed intramolecular decar-
boxylative allylation.14 We surmised that failures en-
countered in allylation of the trifluoroethyl carbanion in
the studies by Uneyama would be solved under the neutral
reaction conditions of an intermolecular palladium-
catalyzed decarboxylative allylation. The generated trifluoro-
ethyl carbanions CF3CRHÀ should be dually stabilized
by the electron-withdrawing phenylsulfonyl group and the
cationic allyl palladium ligand.15,16 Herein, we report effi-
cient conditions for allylation of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl phenyl-
sulfones 1 through a palladium-catalyzed decarboxyl-
ative allylation with allyl carbonates 2 to provide allylated
Our investigations started with the reaction conditions
for the decarboxylative allylation of R-trifluoromethyl
β-keto esters:14 2.5 mol % tris(dibenzylideneacetone) di-
palladium [Pd2(dba)3] and 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino) ethane
(dppe) in THF. Under these conditions in the presence of
ethyl allyl carbonate 2a, the allylation of phenyl trifluoroethyl
phenylsulfone 1a takes place within 1 h at 40 °C to provide
the desired allylated phenyl trifluoroethyl phenylsulfone 3a in
92% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Further optimization of the
reaction conditions using a variety of palladium(II) sources,
ligands including mono- and bidentate phosphines, solvents,
and various ligand-to-palladium ratios did not improve the
yields (see Table S1 in the Supporting Information).
We next examined the substrate scope for the decarbox-
ylative allylation under the best reaction conditions. Tri-
fluoroethyl phenylsulfones 1bÀg having a variety of
aromatic groups at the reaction center were effectively
allylated to provide the desired products 3bÀg that feature
a quaternary trifluoromethylated carbon center in 91 to
99% yields (entries 2À7). Substitution of the benzene ring
as well as group position did not affect yield and reactivity.
Alkyl, allyl, cinnamyl, and chloro substituted substrates
1hÀl were alsoefficiently transformedintothe correspond-
ing allylated trifluoroethyl phenylsulfones 3hÀl in over
90% yields. The reaction of nonsubstituted trifluoroethyl
phenylsulfone 1m with allyl ethyl carbonate (2a) or cinna-
myl ethyl carbonate (2b) provided the desired allylation
products 1j, k having a tertiary stereocenter, although the
yields were low due to competitive bis-allylation (entries
13À14). Fortunately, changing the ligand from dppe to
1,1’-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) improved the
yields of monoallylation significantly (entries 15 and 16),
while bis-allylation was selectively observed in a high yield
of 97% when 2 equiv of allyl carbonate were used in the
presence of dppe (entry 17). Evaluation of ethyl methallyl
carbonate (2c) in this decarboxylative process required
adjustment of the reaction conditions: rac-BINAP was
used asa diphosphine ligand in toluene at 110 °C. With this
appropriate protocol, products 3mÀo were obtained in
(7) FBSM: fluorobis(phenylsulfonyl)methane. (a) Fukuzumi, T.;
Shibata, N.; Sugiura, M.; Yasui, H.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4973. (b) Furukawa, T.; Kawazoe, J.; Zhang,
W.; Nishimine, T.; Tokunaga, E.; Matsumoto, T.; Shiro, M.; Shibata,
N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9684. (c) Ogasawara, M.; Murakami,
H.; Furukawa, T.; Takahashi, T.; Shibata, N. Chem. Commun. 2009,
7366.
(8) Ni, C.; Li, Y.; Hu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6829.
(9) FBDT: 2-fluoro-1,3-benzodithiole-1,1,3,3-tetraoxide. Furukawa,
T.; Goto, Y.; Kawazoe, J.; Tokunaga, E.; Nakamura, S.; Yang, Y.;
Du, H.; Kakehi, A.; Shiro, M.; Shibata, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 1642.
(10) A series of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl phenylsulfones CF3CHRSO2Ph 1
are readily synthesized from CF3CHRSPh (ref 11) by oxidation or
another method (ref 12). See Supporting Information for details.
(11) (a) Nakai, T.; Tanaka, K.; Setoi, H.; Ishikawa, N. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 3069. (b) Uneyama, K.; Momota, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 2265.
(12) Uneyama, K.; Momota, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 3378.
(13) Dong, X.-Q.; Fang, X.; Tao, H.-Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, C.-J. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 1141.
(14) Shibata, N.; Suzuki, S.; Furukawa, T.; Kawai, H.; Tokunaga, E.;
Yuan, Z.; Cahard, D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2037.
(15) For an example of intramolecular decarboxylative allylation,
see: (a) Weaver, J. D.; Tunge, J. A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4657. (b) Weaver,
J. D.; Ka, B. J.; Morris, D. K.; Thompson, W.; Tunge, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 12179.
(16) (a) Weaver, J. D.; Recio, A.; Grenning, A. J.; Tunge, J. A. Chem.
Rev. 2011, 111, 1846. (b) Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L. Chem. Rev.
1996, 96, 395. (c) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2921.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX