(d, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (s, 2H), 6.40 (d, J ¼ 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.35
(dd, J ¼ 9.5 Hz, J ¼ 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J ¼ 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (s,
1H), 4.69 (s, 2H), 4.1–3.8 (m, 6H), 3.3–3.1 (m, 4H), 2.31 (s, 3H),
1.9–1.6 (m, 6H), 1.5–1.4 (m, 6H), 1.4–1.1 (m, 54H), 0.9–0.8 (m,
9H); FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 2920, 2853, 1636, 1575, 1234, 1117,
1075, 720; elemental analysis: calcd (%) for C130H198N4O16Pd2
(2283.29): C 68.31, H 8.73, N 2.45 found C 68.34, H 8.70, N 2.45.
Fig. 7 Side view of a sample (not in scale).
stripes. Patterned glasses were again covered with positive
photoresist and each ITO stripe was exposed to light through a
2 mm long slit with an opening of 5 mm or 10 mm. By choosing the
right process parameters, it was possible to remove the ITO from
the glass in the exposed region, obtaining two ITO electrodes
with sharp edges, as shown in Fig. 7. The span between the
electrodes can be modulated by changing the slit width and the
exposition time. Electrode separations in the 5–40 mm range were
obtained. The last step of the process was the spin-coating of the
material, dissolved in chloroform with a typical concentration of
10 mg mLꢀ1. The thickness of the materials and the spacing
between the electrodes were measured by using a Dektak 8
profilometer from Veeco.
Synthesis of complex IV. Intermediate 1 (100 mg, 0.10 mmol)
and 1.5 eq. of H(O^N)1 (ref. 12) (190 mg, 0.15 mmol) were
solubilized in dichloromethane and ethanol and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 d. The solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting solid was
washed with acetonitrile and precipitated from ethanol/
dichloromethane, filtered and reprecipitated from diethylether/
dichloromethane, filtered, washed with diethylether and with hot
ethanol to yield a dark-blue solid.
1
IV: dark-blue waxy solid; yield 83% (211 mg); H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢁC, TMS): d ¼ 9.35 (d, J ¼ 9.51 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (s,
1H), 7.66 (d, J ¼ 4.65 Hz, 1H), 7.41–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.38 (d, J ¼
8.07 Hz, 1H), 6.89–6.87 (m, 1H), 6.58 (s, 2H), 6.51 (d, J ¼ 2.94
Hz, 1H), 6.36 (s, 1H), 6.28 (s, 1H), 6.23 (d, J ¼ 8.07 Hz, 1H), 4.90
(s, 1H), 4.0–3.9 (m, 10H), 3.52 (q, J ¼ 6.72 Hz, 4H), 1.9–1.7 (m,
10H), 1.6–1.2 (m, 96H), 0.95–0.81 (m, 15H); FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1):
2920, 2853, 1635, 1624, 1580, 1234, 1118, 1075, 720; elemental
analysis: calcd (%) for C100H153N3O9Pd (1646.06): C 72.89, H
9.36, N 2.55; found C 72.90, H 9.38, N 2.56.
Samples were then used to perform photoconductivity
measurement. Note that by using the geometry shown in Fig. 7
and irradiating the sample from the top, light reaches the
material under investigation directly, making it possible to
perform photoconductivity experiments even at wavelengths
below 350 nm, where ITO starts to absorb.
Photoconductivity experiments were performed by using
either light from a Xe-Lamp/Monochromator system or from a
He–Ne laser. To change the light intensity, a set of neutral
density filters with different transmittance were used. The
photocurrent iphoto was obtained from the difference between the
dark and the light currents, measured using an electrometer
(6517A from Keithley), also used to apply the electric field.
Synthesis of complex V. Intermediate 10 (161 mg, 0.07 mmol)
and 2 eq. of H(O^N)1 (ref. 12) (176 mg, 0.14 mmol) were dis-
solved in 30 mL of dichloromethane and 10 mL of ethanol. The
reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 5 days. The solvent was
removed under reduced pressure and the resulting solid was
filtered and washed with hot ethanol, immediately filtered on a
cotton filter and dissolved in dichloromethane.
1
Acknowledgements
V: dark-blue waxy solid; yield 67% (222 mg); H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢁC, TMS): d ¼ 9.28 (d, J ¼ 9.54 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (s,
1H), 7.55–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.04–6.78 (m, 4H), 6.7–6.4 (m, 6H), 6.36
(s, 1H), 6.26 (s, 1H), 5.92 (s, 1H), 4.85 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 4.12–
3.71 (m, 16H), 3.5–3.6 (m, 4H), 2.2–1 (m, 190H), 0.1–0.8 (m,
15H); FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 2913, 2852, 1624, 1581, 1234, 1117,
Financial support from the Ministero dell’Istruzione,
ꢀ
dell’Universita e della Ricerca (MiUR) through the Centro di
Eccellenza CEMIF.CAL (CLAB01TYEF) and from the
ꢀ
Doctorate School Bernardino Telesio of the Universita della
Calabria (A. Ionescu) is gratefully acknowledged.
720; elemental analysis: calcd (%) for
C143H231N3O13Pd
(2304.65): C 74.64, H 10.09, N 1.82; found C 74.61, H 10.12, N
1.62.
Notes and references
1 S. R. Forrest, Nature, 2004, 428, 911.
2 Special Issue: Organic Electronics and Optoelectronics, Chem. Rev.,
2007, 107(4), 923–1386 and papers therein.
Molecular modelling
The H(NR) dimer structure was modelled and optimised in the
gas phase using the Polak–Ribiere conjugate gradient method of
the Hyperchem 7.51 programme (Hyperchem, Hypercube Inc.,
1115 NW 4th street, Gainsville FL 32601, USA) following stan-
dard techniques.33
3 D. S. Weiss and M. Abkowitz, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 479.
4 C. Im, E. V. Emelianova, H. Bassler, H. Spreitzer and H. Beker, J.
Chem. Phys., 2002, 117, 2961.
5 N. Geacintov and M. Pope, J. Chem. Phys., 1967, 47, 1194.
6 S. Sergeyev, W. Pisula and Y. H. Geerts, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36,
1902.
7 E. M. Garcia-Frutos, U. K. Pandey, R. Termine, A. Omenat,
J. Barbera, J. L. Serrano, A. Golemme and B. Gomez-Lor, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7399.
Photoconductivity experiments
8 K. Y. Law, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 449.
9 (a) I. Aiello, D. Dattilo, M. Ghedini and A. Golemme, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 5598; (b) R. Termine, D. Dattilo, I. Aiello,
M. Ghedini and A. Golemme, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 723.
10 I. Aiello, D. Dattilo, M. Ghedini, A. Bruno, R. Termine and
A. Golemme, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 1233.
The substrates used to prepare the samples were obtained from
Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) covered glass sheets (UNAXIS, 110 nm
ITO thickness, sheet resistivity 12 U ,ꢀ1). A photolithographic
process was applied in order to pattern the ITO in 2 mm wide
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 23617–23626 | 23625