344
M. Fujita et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 341–344
by condensation of the amine (11) and the carboxylic
acids, or reaction of the leaving groups-containing
compounds (12) and the amines. In the case of com-
pounds 32 and 33, these were synthesized in con-
siderably lower yield in order to be obtained much more
compounds coupling one amine molecule with two ester
molecules. On the other hand, the ketones (14) having
the hydroxyl or amino groupwere given by treatment
with nicotinonitrile in replacement of nicotinaldehyde in
one-pot. Similar methodology enabled the synthesis of
the target compounds (13) via the ketones (14) in
shorter steps (Scheme 1).
results, the ED50 values for compounds 35 and 36
showed 2.3 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. On the other
hand, TxSI activity was assessed by ex vivo inhibition of
serum TxB2 production in the rat.16 As the results, the
ED50 values for compounds 23–28 were in the range
0.24–5.0 mg/kg.
In conclusion, we have shown that it is feasible to
covalently phenyl moiety the PAF antagonists to Rido-
grel, so as to give a novel agent which express potent
dual PAF antagonist/TxSI activity in vitro. Our further
work will be reported elsewhere.18
The 3-amino compound (18) was prepared as shown in
Scheme 2 by reduction of the nitro (17) with H2/10%
Pd/C.
References and Notes
1. Braquet, P.; Paubert-Braquet, M.; Koltai, M.; Bourgain, R.;
Bussolino, F.; Hosford, D. Trends Pharm. Sci. 1989, 10, 23.
2. Sanchez-Crespo, M. Drug News Perspect. 1993, 6, 78.
3. (a) Page, C. P. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1988, 81, 144. (b)
Barnes, P. J. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1988, 81, 152.
4. Hirsh, P. D.; Hillis, L. D.; Campbell, W. B.; Firth, B. G.;
Willerson, J. T. N. Engl. J. Med. 1981, 304, 684.
The 2-substituted target compound (22) was provided as
shown in Scheme 3 by reaction of 3-bromopyridine and
phthalic anhydride in the first step, and alkylation with
ethyl 5-bromovalerate in the final step. All the com-
pounds shown in Table 1 were provided by similar
methodology.17
5. Oates, J.; Fitzgerald, G.; Branch, R.; Jackson, E.; Knapp,
H.; Roberts, L. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 319, 689.
6. Fitzgerald, D. J.; Roy, L.; Catella, F.; Fitzgerald, G. A. N.
Engl. J. Med. 1986, 315, 983.
7. Fiddler, G.; Lumley, P. Circulation 1990, 81, 69.
8. Hoet, B.; Falcon, C.; De Rey, S.; Arnout, J.; Deckmyn, H.;
Vermylen, J. Blood 1990, 75, 646.
9. Soler, F.; Floch, A.; Robaut, C.; Lave, D.; Cavero, I. Drugs
Future 1992, 17, 207.
10. Yamada, T.; Saito, M.; Mase, T.; Hara, H.; Nagaoka, H.;
Murase, K.; Tomioka, K. Lipids 1991, 26, 1179.
11. Hodgkin, E. E.; Miller, A.; Whittaker, M. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1992, 2, 597.
12. Miyazawa, S.; Okano, K.; Shimomura, N.; Clark, R. S. J.;
Kawahara, T.; Asano, O.; Yoshimura, H.; Miyamoto, M.;
Sakuma, Y.; Muramoto, K.; Obaishi, H.; Harada, K.; Kajima,
T.; Yamada, K.; Tsunoda, H.; Katayama, S.; Abe, S.; Asa-
kawa, N.; Souda, S.; Horie, T.; Sato, T.; Machida, Y.;
Katayama, K.; Yamatsu, I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 3215.
13. Kato, K.; Ohkawa, S.; Terao, S.; Terashita, Z.; Nishi-
kawa, K. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 287.
Results and Discussion
Table 1 summarizes the in vitro activity for a selection
of compounds derived from Ridogrel (1). All com-
pounds except for 32–34 were tested as mixtures of E/Z
isomers. The ratios were obtained from the peak height
of proton in the 3-pyridyl moieties for the isomers.
When compounds with a substituent on the phenyl
groupwere compared with
37, the phenyl analogues
were observed to be weaker TxSIs. Especially, introdu-
cing substituent at the 2-position (22) was considerably
less active, nevertheless PAF antagonist activity was
maintained. Compounds 27, 28, 30, and 31 showed
weaker TxSI activity, while the incorporation of a piper-
azinyl moiety improved PAF antagonist activity. In addi-
tion, the methylene groups for linking the piperazinyl
moiety to the phenyl group were preferable to the carbonyl
groups (27, 28 vs 22, 30). Replacement of the ester moiety
with a carboxyl groupindicated more potent TxSI activ-
ity (29, 34). On the contrary, these compounds were
almost completely PAF antagonistic inactive.
14. Cooper, K.; Fray, M. J.; Parry, M. J.; Richardson, K.;
Steele, J. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3115.
15. Terashita, Z.; Tsushima, S.; Yoshioka, Y.; Nomura, H.;
Inada, Y.; Nishikawa, K. Life Sci. 1983, 32, 1975.
16. Terashita, Z.; Imura, Y.; Tanabe, M.; Kawazoe, K.; Nish-
ikawa, K.; Kato, K.; Terao, S. Thromb. Res. 1986, 41, 223.
17. For additional data related to this work, see: Fujita, M.;
Seki, T.; Inada, H.; Sano, T. J.P. Patent 060570A1, 1997.
18. Fujita, M.; Seki, T.; Inada, H.; Shimizu, K.; Takahama,
A.; Sano, T.; Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., to be submitted for
publication.
Furthermore, representative examples of the dual-acting
compounds were tested in or ex vivo after oral admin-
istration. PAF antagonist activity was assessed in the
mouse, using a PAF-induced death assay.14 As the