Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of (þ)-Crassalactone D (1)
Figure 1. Chemical structures of goniobutenolides A (1) and B
(2), and of (þ)-crassalactone D (3).
As part of our continuing efforts,6 in the preparation
of naturally occurring styryl-lactones and their analogs
as potential antitumor agents from monosaccharides, we
now disclose novel total syntheses of goniobutenolides
A (1) and B (2), (þ)-crassalactone D (3), and the related
C-7 epimers, along with their effects on the proliferation of
some human malignant cell lines.
The retrosynthetic analysis of (þ)-crassalactone D (3)
is shown in Scheme 1. We envisaged that the spiroketal
center in 3 could be established by spirocyclization of 1
through a 5-endo-trig ring closure process, under the
conditions similar to those reported in the literature.7 It
was further envisioned that goniobutenolides A (1) and
B (2) could be synthesized from 9, via 3b, by a one-pot
cascade comprised of Z-selective olefination, followed by
lactonization and E2 elimination. It is therefore essential
that the key intermediate 3b and its precursor 9 contain a
good leaving group at C-3 and a convenient protective
group at O-5. Cyclic carbonate was chosen because it can
act as a protecting group for the diol functionality,8 but at
the same time, it can undergo ring-opening reactions, due
to its good leaving group properties.9
Scheme 2. Preparation of Intermediates 9 and 10
Lactol of type 9 is visualized from D-glucose, via 5, by
well established chemical reactions.6e,10
At the outset, we focused on the synthesis of the key
building blocks 9 and 10 starting from commercially
available diacetone-D-glucose (4, Scheme 2).
Treatment of 5 with 1,10-carbonyldiimidazole in boiling
toluene provided the cyclic carbonate 7 in 95% yield.
Under similar reaction conditions stereoisomer 6 gave 8
(76%). Hydrolytic removal of the isopropylidene protec-
tive groups in both 7 and 8 afforded the corresponding
lactols 9 and 10 in almost quantitative yields. Both pro-
ducts, and particularly stereoisomer 9, are rather hygro-
scopic. They should be therefore used in the next synthetic
step immediately after its brief isolation.
It was expected that lactol 9 could directly give natural
product 1 (and/or its E-isomer 2) under Z-selective Wittig
olefination conditions,11 presuming a subsequent two-step
cascade comprised of γ-lactonization of the intermediate
conjugated ester followed by concomitant E2 elimination
of cyclic carbonate functionality (Scheme 1). In our first
experiment, lactol 9 was submitted to the reaction with a
stabilized ylide (reagent A, Table 1) in dry methanol, to
afford a 2:1 mixture of 1 and 2 in 30% combined yield.
Next, the olefination step was examined in the presence of
(5) (a) Pavlakos, E.; Georgiou, T.; Tofi, M.; Montagnon, T.;
Vassilikogiannakis, G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4556. (b) Yang, Z.; Tang,
P.; Gauuan, J. F.; Molino, B. F. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 9546.
ꢁ
ꢁ
(6) (a) Popsavin, V.; Benedekovic, G.; Sreco, B.; Popsavin, M.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
Francuz, J.; Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic, G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4235. (b)
ꢁ
ꢁ
Popsavin, V.; Benedekovic, G.; Sreco, B.; Popsavin, M.; Francuz, J.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5178. (c)
ꢁ
ꢁ
Popsavin, V.; Benedekovic, G.; Sreco, B.; Francuz, J.; Popsavin, M.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic, G.; Divjakovic, V. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10596.
ꢁ
ꢁ
(d) Popsavin, V.; Sreco, B.; Benedekovic, G.; Francuz, J.; Popsavin, M.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2876. (e)
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
Popsavin, V.; Benedekovic, G.; Popsavin, M.; Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic,
ꢁ
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3426. (f) Francuz, J.; Sreco, B.; Popsavin,
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
M.; Benedekovic, G.; Divjakovic, V.; Kojic, V.; Bogdanovic, G.; Kapor,
A.; Popsavin, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1819.
(7) (a) Perron, F.; Albizati, K. F. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1617. (b)
Knight, D. W.; Shaw, D. E.; Staples, E. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
1973.
(8) Parrish, J. P.; Salvatore, R. N.; Jung, K. W. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
8207.
(9) Verhelst, S. H. L.; Wennekes, T.; vander Marel, G. A.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; van Boeckel, C. A. A.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
2813.
(11) For examples of Z-selective Wittig olefinations, see: (a) Shing,
T. K. M.; Tsui, H.-Ch; Zhou, Z.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3121. (b)
Ramirez, E.; Sanchez, Meza-Leon, M. R. L.; Quintero, L.; Sartillo-Piscil,
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
(10) Gracza, T.; Szolcsanyi, P. Molecules 2000, 5, 1386.
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2178.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 23, 2012
5957