yashi6 and co-workers described an efficient coupling of
propargylic alcohols with ketones for the formation of γ-alkynyl
ketones and the straightforward synthesis of substituted furans
in the presence of a catalytic amount of a ruthenium catalyst.
Nevertheless, with this method, the substrate is generally limited
to the propargylic alcohols bearing a terminal alkyne group.
Matsuda’s team7 reported that iridium complex [Ir(cod)-
{P(OPh)3}2]OTf serves as a catalyst for the transformation to
γ-alkynyl ketones by the coupling of propargylic esters with
enoxysilanes. However, the peculiarity and high cost of such
catalysts make a barrier to their large-scale use.
FeCl3-Catalyzed Nucleophilic Substitution of
Propargylic Acetates with Enoxysilanes
Zhuang-ping Zhan,* Xu-bin Cai, Shao-pei Wang,
Jing-liang Yu, Hui-juan Liu, and Yuan-yuan Cui
Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, Xiamen UniVersity, Xiamen 361005, Fujian,
People’s Republic of China
We have recently developed a highly efficient iron(III)- or
bismuth(III)-catalyzed propargylic substitution of propargylic
alcohols or esters with various heteroatom- and carbon-centered
nucleophiles.8 Naturally, we intended to extend this method to
the route to γ-alkynyl ketones. However, no propargylation
occurred while using ketones as the nucleophiles under our
reaction conditions, probably due to the weak nucleophilicity
of the R-C of the ketones. Gratifyingly, enoxysilanes as the
carbon-centered nucleophiles exhibited strong nucleophilicity.
The nucleophilic substitution reaction of propargylic acetates
with enoxysilanes proceeded rapidly in the presence of 5 mol
% of FeCl3 and efficiently afforded corresponding γ-alkynyl
ketones in high yields. Herein we reported the successful results
and scope of the reactions, and this iron(III)-catalyzed reaction
allows for the straightforward synthesis of tri- or tetrasubstituted
furans.
ReceiVed August 19, 2007
An efficient FeCl3-catalyzed substitution reaction of prop-
argylic acetates with enoxysilanes under mild conditions to
afford corresponding γ-alkynyl ketones has been developed.
The substitution reaction is followed by a TsOH-catalyzed
cyclization without purification of the γ-alkynyl ketone
intermediates, offering a straightforward synthetic route to
tri- or tetrasubstituted furans.
Reaction of propargylic acetate 1a and enoxysilane 2a was
first carried out employing FeCl3 as the catalyst. γ-Alkynyl
ketone 3aa was obtained in 83% isolated yield at room
temperature within just 5 min by simple stirring of 1a (0.5
mmol), enoxysilane 2a (1.5 mmol), and FeCl3 (0.025 mmol) in
acetonitrile. With the conditions in hand, various propargylic
acetates were treated with the enoxysilane 2a in the presence
of 5 mol % of FeCl3and all the reactions gave the desired
coupling products in moderate to high yields. Typical results
are summarized in Table 1. The reaction proceeded smoothly
without exclusion of moisture or air from the reaction mixture.
Both electron-donating (1m) and electron-withdrawing (1k, 1l)
The acetylenic carbon-carbon triple bond plays a pivotal role
in a variety of functional group transformations,1 which has
resulted in the steady growth in the synthesis of propargylic
derivatives. An efficient route to propargylic derivatives is
through propargylic substitution reactions. Reactions of this type
have been traditionally carried out by using the classical
Nicholas reaction but with some drawbacks: more than a
stoichiometric amount of [Co2(CO)8] is required, and several
steps are necessary to obtain propargylic products from prop-
argylic alcohols via cationic propargylic complexes [Co2(CO)6-
(propargyl)]+.2,3 Some transition metal complexes were devel-
oped to catalyze the propargylic substitution reactions of
propargylic alcohols with nucleophiles,4,5 where most of the
nucleophiles were heteroatom-centered such as alcohols, thiols,
amides, and so on. However, the carbon-centered nucleophiles
were unfortunately limited to allyl silanes for the construction
of sp3-sp3 C-C bonds in the reaction.4b,5h Recently, Nishiba-
(5) (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 11019. (b) Nishibayashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Inada, Y.; Hidai, M.;
Uemura, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11846. (c) Nishibayashi, Y.;
Milton, M. D.; Inada, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M.; Uemura,
S.; Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1433. (d) Nishibayashi, Y.; Inada, Y.; Hidai,
M.; Uemura, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7900. (e) Nishibayashi, Y.;
Inada, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 1495. (f) Inada, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y.; Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15172. (g) Sherry, B. D.; Radosevich, A. T.;
Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6076. (h) Georgy, M.; Boucard,
V.; Campagne, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14180. (i) Mahrwald,
R.; Quint, S.; Scholtis, S. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9847. (j) Liu, J. H.; Muth,
E.; Flo¨rke, U.; Henkel, G.; Merz, K.; Sauvageau, J.; Schwake, E.; Dyker,
G. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 456.
(6) (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Wakiji, I.; Ishii, Y.; Uemura, S.; Hidai, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3393. (b) Inada, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura,
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7715. (c) Milton, M. D.; Inada, Y.;
Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2712. (d) Nishibayashi,
Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Inada, Y.; Milton, M. D.; Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2681.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone/fax: +86(592)
2180318.
(1) (a) Hudrlik, P. F.; Hudrlik, A. M. In The Chemistry of the Carbon-
Carbon Triple Bond; Patai, S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chester, UK, 1978;
Chapter 7, p 199. (b) Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds: Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 4.
(2) Review articles: (a) Nicholas, K. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 207.
(b) Caffyn, A. J. M.; Nicholas, K. M. ComprehensiVe Organometallic
Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, J., Eds.; Pergamon
Press: Oxford, UK, 1995; Vol. 12, Chapter 7.1, p 685. (c) Green, J. R.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 809. (d) Teobald, B. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
4133. (e) Kuhn, O.; Rau, D.; Mayr, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 900.
(3) Nicholas, K. M.; Mulvaney, M.; Bayer, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 2508.
(7) Matsuda, I.; Komori, K.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9072.
(8) (a) Zhan, Z. P.; Yu, J. L.; Liu, H. J.; Cui, Y. Y.; Yang, R. F.; Yang,
W. Z.; Li, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8298. (b) Zhan, Z. P.; Yang, W.
Z.; Yang, R. F.; Yu, J. L.; Liu, H. J.; Cui, Y. Y. Chem. Commun. 2006,
3352. (c) Zhan, Z. P.; Liu, H. J. Synlett. 2006, 2278.
(4) (a) Kennedy-Smith, J. J.; Young, L. A.; Toste, F. D. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 1325. (b) Luzung, M. R.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
15760.
10.1021/jo701782g CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/13/2007
9838
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9838-9841