38
N. Liu et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 27 (2013) 36–39
Appendix A. Supplementary material
CCDC-793860 (3) and CCDC-793859 (4) contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for complexes 3 and 4. These data can be obtained
free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
associated with this article can be found, in the online version at
References
[1] H. Schmidbaur, R. Pichl, G. Müller, A polyfunctional dititanacyclobutane, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 25 (1986) 574–575.
[2] X. Li, M. Schopf, J. Stephan, K. Harms, J. Sundermeyer, Heavily π-bond-loaded
tungsten phosphonio–alkylidyne complexes via a domino transylidation cascade
at (organoimido)tungsten tetrachlorides, Organometallics 21 (2002) 2356–2358.
[3] X. Li, J. Stephan, K. Harms, J. Sundermeyer, Formation of
a rhenium(VII)
phosphonio–methylidyne complex, Organometallics 23 (2004) 3359–3361.
[4] X. Li, H. Sun, K. Harms, J. Sundermeyer, Simple synthesis and structure characteriza-
tion of a stable niobium(V) phosphoniomethylidyne complex, Organometallics 24
(2005) 4699–4701.
[5] X. Li, A. Wang, L. Wang, H. Sun, K. Harms, J. Sundermeyer, Phosphorus ylide as a pre-
cursor for the formation of new high-valent tantalum phosphonio methylidyne
complexes, Organometallics 26 (2007) 1411–1413.
[6] X. Li, A. Wang, H. Sun, L. Wang, S. Schmidt, K. Harms, J. Sundermeyer, Effect of dif-
ferent bases and phosphorus ylide on the selective deprotonation of phosphorus
ylide adduct Cp*TaCl4(CH2 =PPh3), Organometallics 26 (2007) 3456–3460.
[7] Synthesis of 3. Method a: To the solution of (C5Me4H)TaCl4 [13–15] (1.2 g,
2.70 mmol) in 30 mL of toluene was added Ph3P=CH2 [16] (3.7 g, 13.40 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at 0 °C. After 15 d of stirring at room temperature, the resulting
suspension was filtered. Toluene was evaporated under vacuo and the residue
was extracted with pentane and diethyl ether. The product was crystallized as
orange crystals from pentane. Yield: 0.72 g (30%). Anal. calcd for C47H44TaClP2
(3; 887.21 g/mol): C, 63.63; H, 5.00. Found: C, 63.82; H, 4.99. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
Fig. 2. Molecular structure of 4 and selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Ta1–C1
2.337(3), C1–P1 1.773(3), P1–C14 1.802(4), P1–C8 1.827(3), P1–C2 1.804(4), Ta1–Cl1
2.4073(9), Ta1–Cl2 2.4289(9), Ta1–Cl3 2.4516(12), Ta1–Cl4 2.4045(12), Ta1–C1–P1
132.22(18), C1–Ta1–Cl1 80.74(9), C1–Ta1–Cl2 74.96(9), C1–Ta1–Cl3 78.68(10), C1–
Ta1–Cl4 77.55(10), C1–P1–C2 115.90(16), C1–P1–C8 107.86(15), and C1–P1–C14
114.53(17).
4
5
C6D6, 300 K, ppm): 2.06 (d, JHH=8.1 Hz, 6H, C5Me4H), 2.13 (d, JHH=3.6 Hz, 6H,
C5Me4H), 4.50 (t′, |2JPH+4JPH|=2.7 Hz, 1H, Ta=CH), 5.46 (s, 1H, C5Me4H),
6.96–8.04 (m, 30H, PPh3). 31P NMR (121 MHz, C6D6, 300 K, ppm): −25.9
4
4
(d, JPP=5.5 Hz, 1P, TaCPPh3), 22.3 (d, JPP=5.5 Hz, 1P, TaCHPPh3). 13C NMR
(75 MHz, C6D6, 300 K, ppm): 11.4 (s, C5Me4H), 14.1 (s, C5Me4H), 65.8 (s, CMe,
C5Me4H), 99.4 (s, CH, C5Me4H), 112.2 s, 113.8 s, 117.6 s, 118.4 s, 119.0 s, 119.7 s,
4
4
3
130.0 (d, JP,C =2.3 Hz), 130.3 (d, JP,C =3.0 Hz), 133.2 (d, JP,C =9.0 Hz),
also in accordance with the strength of basicity of the cyclopentadienyl
ligands.
3
4
4
134.2 (d, JP,C =9.0 Hz), 135.1 (d, JP,C =2.0 Hz), 135.4 s, 136.2 (d, JP,
C =2.0 Hz),136.5 s, 202.2 (t′, |1JP,C 3JP,C|=12.8 Hz,Ta`C). Method b: To a sus-
+
pension of (C5Me4H)TaCl4 (0.90 g, 2.03 mmol) in 30 mL of toluene was added
1.68 g (6.08 mmol) of Ph3P=CH2 in 20 mL of toluene at 0 °C. The reaction mix-
ture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h, and the resulting suspension was
treated with a solution of 1.02 g (6.09 mmol) LiN(SiMe3)2 in 20 mL of toluene at
−78 °C. The reaction solution was allowed to warm slowly to room tempera-
ture and stirred for an additional 12 h. Removal of the precipitate by filtration
furnished a bright red solution containing 3 analyzed by 31P NMR spectroscopy.
Yield: 100% confirmed by 31P NMR.
A strong base, LiN(SiMe3)2, was added to the reaction of (C5Me4H)
TaCl4 with Ph3P=CH2 to improve the yield of complex 3 because the
basicity of the phosphorus ylide Ph3P=CH2 is weaker than that of
LiN(SiMe3)2 (Eq. (5)) [7]. With the addition of 3 equivalents of
LiN(SiMe3)2 and 3 equivalents of Ph3P=CH2 complex 3 could be
quantitatively obtained within 12 h.
[8] Crystallographic data for 3. C47H44TaClP2, Mr=887.21, monoclinic, space group
P2(1)/n, a=10.7345(10) Å, b=27.758(3) Å, c=14.4496(14) Å, V=4095.9(7)
Å3, T=298 K, Z=4, Dc=1.439 g/cm3, μ=2.858 mm−1. A total of 22,717 reflec-
tions were collected, 8458 unique (Rint=0.0287), R1=0.0293 (for 8458 reflec-
tions with I>2 sigma(I)), wR2=0.0712 (all data). The structure was solved by
direct methods and refined with full-matrix least-squares on all F2 (SHELXL-97)
with non-hydrogen atoms anisotropic.
[9] M.R. Churchill, W.J. Youngs, Crystal and molecular structure of a tantalum–
benzylidyne complex, Ta(η5-C5Me5)(CPh)(PMe3)2Cl. Evidence for a tantalum–
carbon triple bond, Inorg. Chem. 18 (1979) 171–176.
3 LiN(SiMe )
+
3
2
Ta
3
2 HN(SiMe )
LiCl
+
+
Ta
3
Ph3P = CH2
Ph3P
3
2
+
Cl
C
H
Cl
C
[Ph3PCH3][N(SiMe3)2]
Cl
Cl
PPh3
Cl
3
ð5Þ
In conclusion, a high-valent phosphoniomethylidyne tantalum
[10] M.R. Churchill, H.J. Wasserman, H.W. Turner, R.R. Schrock, α-Hydride elimination:
the first observable equilibriums between alkylidene complexes and alkylidyne hy-
dride complexes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982) 1710–1716.
complex 3 with tetramethylcyclopentadienyl as a supporting li-
gand was obtained via transylidation reactions of (C5Me4H)TaCl4
with 5 equivalents of Ph3P=CH2. With the addition of 3 equiv
of LiN(SiMe3)2 and 3 equiv of Ph3P=CH2 complex 3 could be
quantitatively obtained. The ylide adduct complex 4 was obtained
as an intermediate through the reactions of (C5Me4H)TaCl4 with
one equivalent of Ph3P=CH2. Complexes 3 and 4 were structural-
ly characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. A comparison
of the phosphoniomethylidyne tantalum complexes with different
ancillary ligands (1 with Cp; 3 with tetramethylcyclopentadienyl
[11] Synthesis of 4. To the solution of (C5Me4H)TaCl4 (0.60 g, 1.35 mmol) in 20 mL of
toluene was added PPh3P=CH2 (0.37 g, 1.35 mmol) in 20 mL of toluene at 0 °C.
The reaction mixture gradually changed from yellow to brown. After 12 h of stir-
ring at room temperature, the suspension was filtered. Toluene was evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with pentane and diethyl ether. Crystalli-
zation at 0 °C afforded complex 4 as yellow crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction
analysis. Yield: 0.68 g (70.6%). Anal. calcd for C28H30TaCl4P (4; 720.24 g/mol): C,
46.69; H, 4.20. Found: C, 47.01; H, 4.02. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 300 K, ppm):
2
2.22 (s, 6H, CH3), 2.56 (s, 6H, CH3), 4.01 (d, JP,H=15.9 Hz, 2H, PCH2), 5.84 (s,
1 H, C5Me4H), 6.90–7.80 (m, 15H, PPh3). 31P NMR (121 MHz, C6D6, 300 K,
ppm): 34.1 (s, PPh3).
⁎
[12] Crystallographic data for 4. C28H30TaCl4P, Mr=720.24, monoclinic, space group
P2(1)/c, a=15.525(3) Å, b=12.036(2) Å, c=15.618(3) Å, V=2725.6(9) Å3,
T=298 K, Z=4, Dc=1.755 g/cm3, μ=4.500 mm−1. A total of 15,051 reflections
were collected, 5474 unique (Rint =0.0887), R1=0.0228 (for 5474 reflections
with I>2 sigma(I)), wR2=0.0645 (all data). The structure was solved by direct
methods and refined with full-matrix least-squares on all F2 (SHELXL-97) with
non-hydrogen atoms anisotropic.
and 2 with Cp ) was discussed.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by NSFC no. 21172132/20972087.