J. Zitko et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 476–479
479
might be caused by the increase of their intracellular
References and notes
accumulation.
1. Sayahi, H.; Zimhony, O.; Jacobs, W. R., Jr.; Shekhtman, A.; Welch, J. T. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4804.
2. Zimhony, O.; Cox, J. S.; Welch, J. T. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 1043.
3. Boshoff, H. I.; Mizrahi, V.; Barry, C. E. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 2167.
4. Zimhony, O.; Vilcheze, C.; Arai, M.; Welch, J. T.; Jacobs, W. R. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2007, 51, 752.
5. Ngo, S.; Zimhony, O.; Chung, W. J.; Sayahi, H.; Jacobs, W. R.; Welch, J. T.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 2430.
6. Shi, W.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.; Yuan, H.; Lee, J. S.; Barry, C. E.; Wang, H. H.; Zhang,
W. H.; Zhang, Y. Science 2011, 333, 1630.
7. Dolezal, M.; Hartl, J.; Lycka, A.; Buchta, V.; Odlerova, Z. Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 1995, 60, 1236.
8. Palek, L.; Dvorak, J.; Svobodova, M.; Buchta, V.; Jampilek, J.; Dolezal, M. Arch.
Pharm. 2008, 341, 61.
9. Dlabal, K.; Palat, K.; Lycka, A.; Odlerova, Z. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1990,
55, 2493.
10. Jampilek, J.; Dolezal, M.; Kunes, J.; Satinsky, D.; Raich, I. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005,
9, 49.
Selectivity index (SI) defined as IC50/MIC in molar concentra-
tions was calculated for antimycobacterial activity against M.
tuberculosis. SI >10 is generally recognized as a safe value for a drug
candidate, granting the sufficient difference between efficient
(regarding the intended biological effect) and cytotoxic concentra-
tions. Among the prepared compounds, only compound 7d met
this criterion. PZA itself had been reported to possess relatively
low single dose Hep G2 cytotoxicity of IC50 = 79.1 mM18, which,
taking into account the antitubercular activity against M. tuberculosis
determined in our assay, would lead to estimated SI = 775–1550.
Obviously, the benzylamine derivatives presented in this paper
exerted significantly higher levels of in vitro Hep G2 cytotoxicity.
However, the SI indexes of compounds 7d, 7h and 8d indicate that
the antimycobacterial activity of these derivatives is rather specific
than nonselective based on general cytotoxicity.
11. Zitko, J.; Jampilek, J.; Dobrovolny, L.; Svobodova, M.; Kunes, J.; Dolezal, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 1598.
To sum up, nine of the prepared compounds exerted similar or bet-
ter activity against M. tuberculosis compared to PZA. Compound 8b
possessed the best antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis;
8a inhibited all of the tested strains and had the broadest activity
spectrum; 7d combined good antimycobacterial activity against M.
tuberculosis with relatively low cytotoxicity (hepatotoxicity). In our
opinion these compounds are suitable as a subject to further
structural modifications.
12. Zitko, J.; Dolezal, M.; Svobodova, M.; Vejsova, M.; Kunes, J.; Kucera, R.; Jilek, P.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1471.
13. CS ChemOffice Ultra ver. 12.0 (CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA) and ACD/
logP v.12.01 (Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Toronto, Canada).
14. Logk is the logarithm of capacity factor k calculated according to the formula
k = (tR À tD); tR is the retention time of individual compound, tD is the dead
time of the system determined as the retention time of KI methanol solution.
See Supplementary data for experimental details.
15. Microdilution panel method. M. tuberculosis H37Rv CNCTC My 331/88, M.
kansasii Hauduroy CNCTC My 235/80, M. avium ssp. avium Chester CNCTC My
80/72 and M. avium CNCTC My 152/73 were obtained from Czech National
Collection of Type Cultures (CNCTC), National Institute of Public Health,
Acknowledgments
Prague, Czech Republic. MIC [lg/mL] was determined visually as the lowest
concentration of tested compound that inhibited the growth of mycobacteria.
See Supplementary data for experimental details.
16. Yew, W. W.; Leung, C. C. Respirology 2006, 11, 699.
17. Tostmann, A.; Boeree, M. J.; Aarnoutse, R. E.; de Lange, W. C. M.; van der Ven,
A.; Dekhuijzen, R. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 23, 192.
18. Tostmann, A.; Boeree, M. J.; Peters, W. H. M.; Roelofs, H. M. J.; Aarnoutse, R. E.;
van der Ven, A.; Dekhuijzen, P. N. R. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 577.
19. Singh, M.; Sasi, P.; Rai, G.; Gupta, V. H.; Amarapurkar, D.; Wangikar, P. P. Med.
Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 1611.
This publication is a result of the project implementation: ‘Sup-
port of establishment, development, and mobility of quality re-
search teams at the Charles University’, project number CZ.1.07/
2.3.00/30.0022, supported by The Education for Competitiveness
Operational Programme (ECOP) and co-financed by the European
Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic. This study
was also supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
of the Czech Republic (SVV-2012-265-001) and Ministry of Health
of the Czech Republic—IGA NT 13346 (2012).
20. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines—4th ed. WHO document no. WHO/HTM/
TB/2009.420, 2010. ISBN 978 92 4 154783 3.
21. Promega Corporation. CellTiter 96Ò AQueous one solution cell proliferation
assay. Owen, T.C. U.S. Patent, 5185,450, 1993.
22. Kratky, M.; Vinsova, J.; Volkova, M.; Buchta, V.; Trejtnar, F.; Stolarikova, J. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2012, 50, 433.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,