An efficient CuI/DBU-catalyzed one-pot protocol for synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles

Article abstract of DOI:10.1039/c6ra23789d

A convenient CuI/DBU catalyzed one-pot method has been developed for the synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles through the coupling of aryl iodides with sodium azide, followed by the intermolecular cyclization between the generated aryl azides and phenylacetaldehyde derivatives or alkynes in DMSO. The established protocol was compatible with a wide scope of substrates in good to excellent yields.

Full text of DOI:10.1039/c6ra23789d

View Article Online
View Journal
RSC Advances
Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: Y. Jiang, X. Li, Y.
Zhao, S. Jia, M. Li, Z. Zhao, R. Zhang, W. Li and W. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D.
This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the
Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
accepted for publication.
Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after
acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading.
Using this free service, authors can make their results available
to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited
article. We will replace this Accepted Manuscript with the edited
and formatted Advance Article as soon as it is available.
You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the
author guidelines.
Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes
to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s
standard Terms & Conditions and the ethical guidelines, outlined
in our author and reviewer resource centre, still apply. In no
event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible
for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any
consequences arising from the use of any information it contains.
rsc.li/rsc-advances

Page 1 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
An Efficient CuI/DBU-Catalyzed One-pot Protocol for Synthesis of 1,4-Disubstituted
1,2,3-Triazoles
Yuqin Jiang*, Xingfeng Li, Yaru Zhao, Shuhong Jia, Mingrui Li, Zhiqi Zhao, Ruili Zhang, Wei Li
and Weiwei Zhang*
Henan Engineering Laboratory of Chemical Pharmaceuticals & Biomedical Materials,
Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Province for Green Manufacturing of Fine Chemicals,
Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Media and Reactions, Ministry of Education, School of
chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, P. R. China.
E-mail: jiangyuqin@htu.cn
A convenient CuI/DBU catalyzed one-pot method has been developed for synthesis of
1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles through the coupling of aryl iodides with sodium azide, followed
by the intermolecular cyclization between the generated aryl azides and phenylacetaldehyde
derivatives or alkynes in DMSO. The established protocol was compatible with a wide scope of
substrates in good to excellent yields.
Introduction
1,4-Disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles, as an important class of organic compounds, display a vast
spectrum of properties.1 The classical copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC)
reaction has been generally considered as the most striking method for regioselective synthesis of
1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles, which was independently discovered by the groups of Sharpless2
and Meldal.3 An alternative method based upon enolate-mediated organocatalytic azide-aldehyde
[3+2] cycloaddition reaction has been developed for the high-yielding and regioselective synthesis
of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles.4
It is well-known that aryl azides are the indispensable intermediates for both the CuAAC
reaction and the organocatalytic azide-aldehyde [3+2] cycloaddition. The preferred preparation
method for aryl azides is the coupling of sodium azide with aryl halides, although the replacement
of diazonium salts or some activated aryl halides with sodium azide usually works well.5 In 2004,
D. W. Ma and coworkers reported that the coupling reaction of aryl halides with sodium azide
catalyzed by CuI/L-proline underwent well at a relatively low temperature to provide aryl azides
in good to excellent yields in DMSO or EtOH/H2O.6 After that, cuprous catalyst systems together
with the ligands or bases, such as CuI/diamine,7 CuBr/N,N’-dimethylethylenediamine,8

RSC Advances
Page 2 of 11
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
Cu2O/tetraethylammnium prolinate9 and CuFeO2/L-proline10 were reported. Except cuprous
catalyst systems, heterogeneous metallic Cu(0) or cupric salts were also used as catalysts. In 2014,
D. M. Cui and co-workers reported the synthesis of aryl azides via a coupling reaction of aryl
iodides with sodium azide catalyzed by heterogeneous Cu(0) under mild conditions in the
presence of L-proline and diisopropylamine.11 At the same year, B. M. Bhanage and co-workers
firstly reported a protocol for the coupling of aryl iodides with sodium azide to aryl azides using
Cu(TMHD)2 as the catalyst in DMF at 100 ºC.12 However, most of the methods mentioned above
have the drawbacks such as high reaction temperature and long reaction time, which lead to the
decomposition of the generated aryl azides.
Considering the dangerous properties of organic azides, one-pot methods for synthesis of
1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles avoiding separating the generated organic azides from the reaction
mixtures have gained great attentions in recent years. The developed protocols were suitable for
the reaction among alkyl13 or aryl14 halides, sodium azide and alkynes. To the best of our
knowledge, there is no report on the one-pot reaction among aryl halides, sodium azide and
phenylacetaldehyde derivatives to give 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles. In continuous with our
previous work on the one-pot reaction for synthesis of 1,4-disubstitued 1,2,3-triazoles,15 the main
aim of this paper is to establish a one-pot reaction among aryl halides, sodium azide and
phenylacetaldehyde derivatives. The two-step one-pot reactions among aryl iodides, sodium azide
and phenylacetaldehyde derivatives (or alkynes) catalyzed by CuI/DBU in DMSO could provide
1,4-disubstitued 1,2,3-triazoles in good to excellent yields.
Results and Discussion
Scheme 1. Model reaction for optimizing the reaction conditions.
The reaction among aryl iodides, sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde derivatives proceeded
by a two-step process for synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles. The first process is to form
aryl azide from aryl iodide and sodium azide, which is a key step and usually carried out at a
relatively high reaction temperature in DMSO. The subsequent process is the reaction of
phenylacetaldehyde derivatives with the formed aryl azide, which could be smoothly carried out in
DMSO catalyzed by DBU at room temperature.4 For optimizing the conditions for synthesis of

Page 3 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
aryl azides, the reaction between iodobenzene and sodium azide was selected as the model
reaction (Scheme 1).
Fig. 1. The effects of the amount of CuI/DBU on the conversion of the model reaction.
The reaction between iodobenzene (1.0 mmol) and sodium azide (1.2 mmol) was carried out at
95 °C in DMSO (3.0 mL) at different amounts of CuI and DBU for 7 hours and monitored by
HPLC per 30 minutes. Firstly, the amount of CuI used was fixed at 10 mol%. As shown in Fig. 1,
it was found that the reaction obtained the best conversion (83 %) in 3.5 hours in the presence of
15 mol% DBU among the tested amounts of DBU (10 mol%, 15 mol%, 20 mol%, 30 mol%).
When increasing the loading of CuI to 20 mol% and keeping the ratio of CuI to DBU at 1.0:1.5,
the conversion reached 97 % in 2.5 hours, which was much higher than that obtained in the
presence of 10 mol% CuI and 30 mol% DBU. While elevating the loading of CuI to 40 mol% in
the presence of 30 mol% DBU, the conversion began to decrease after 2.0 hours, which indicated
that a great amount of CuI might lead to the decomposition of the generated aryl azides. In
addition, when the reaction was carried out catalyzed only by 20 mol% CuI in the absence of DBU,
trace product was obtained, which indicated that the presence of DBU was crucial for the reaction.
Finally, the 20 mol% CuI and 30 mol% DBU were selected for further investigation.
Table 1. The model reaction for synthesis of phenyl azide.a
Entry
Base (mol %)
DBU (30)
DBU (30)
DBU (30)
DBU (30)
CuI (mol %)
Temp. (ºC)
Time (h)
2.5
Yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
20
20
20
20
105
95
88
95
50
80
2.5
80
2.5
80
13

RSC Advances
Page 4 of 11
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
5
6
DBU (30)
DBU (30)
20
20
60
r.t.
2.5
2.5
10
0
a The reactions were performed with iodobenzene (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), DBU (30 mol%)
and CuI (20 mol%) in DMSO (3 mL) for 2.5-13.0 h.
b Isolated yield.
Reaction temperature is an important factor for synthesis of aryl azides from aryl halides and
sodium azide. To investigate the suitable reaction temperature, the reaction was carried out at
different temperatures (105 °C, 95 °C, 80 °C, 60 °C and room temperature ) catalyzed by 20 mol%
CuI and 30 mol% DBU in DMSO for 2.5 hours. The results were summarized in Table 1. When
the reaction was carried out at 95 °C, the highest isolated yield (95 %) was obtained (Table 1,
entry 2). When elevating the reaction temperature to 105 °C, 88 % isolated yield was obtained
(Table 1, entry 1). The slight decrease of the yield at 105 °C might be ascribed to the
decomposition of phenyl azide at high reaction temperature.16 When the reactions were performed
at 80 °C and 60 °C, the obtained yields were only 50 % and 10 % respectively (Table 1, entry 3
and 5). Prolonging the reaction time to 13.0 hours at 80 °C, the final yield was 80 % (Table 1,
entry 4). When the reaction was carried out at room temperature, no product was obtained (Table
1, entry 6). The results mentioned above indicated that a relatively high reaction temperature could
facilitate the reaction. Therefore, 95 °C was selected as the optimized temperature for the reaction.
Having established conditions for the coupling of iodobenzene with sodium azide, we next
focused our attention to one-pot synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles from iodobenzene,
sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde. Firstly, the one-pot reaction was carried out by adding all
the reactants (iodobenzene, sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde) in DMSO at 95 ºC in the
presence of 20 mol% CuI and 30 mol% DBU. Unfortunately, poor isolated products were obtained.
Then, a two-step one-pot procedure was investigated. Initially, the reaction between the
corresponding aryl iodides and sodium azide was carried out in DMSO at 95 ºC in the presence of
20 mol% CuI and 30 mol% DBU. After the reaction was completed, the reaction mixture was
cooled to room temperature and phenylacetaldehyde derivatives were added to react with the
formed aryl azides, which were not separated from the reaction mixture. As shown in Table 2,
various aryl iodides were then examined, and the corresponding 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles
were obtained in good to excellent yields (Table 2, entries 1-12). The aryl iodides bearing the

Page 5 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
functional group such as Br or Cl were not been affected. Furthermore, the established one-pot
protocol was also used for the reaction among aryl iodides, sodium azide and terminal alkynes,
which have been reported previously.13, 14 Similarly, it was carried out firstly by adding all the
reactants (aryl iodides, sodium azide and alkynes) in DMSO at 95 ºC in the presence of 20 mol%
CuI and 30 mol% DBU. It was very interesting that only homocoupling products 1,3-diynes were
obtained instead of 1,4-disubstitued 1,2,3-triazoles. Even at room temperature, 1,3-diynes were the
only products in 20 minutes. It indicated that the conditions were very suitable for the
homocoupling reaction between alkynes.17 Therefore, the one-pot reaction among aryl iodides,
sodium azide and alkynes was carried out according to the same procedure as that established for
the reaction among aryl iodides, sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde derivatives. As shown in
Table 3, the established two-step one-pot reaction protocol was also suitable for the reaction
among aryl iodides, sodium azide and alkynes, and the 1,4-disubstitued 1,2,3-triazoles could be
obtained in good to excellent yields.
Table 2. Synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles from aryl iodides, sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde
derivatives.a
Entry
1
aryl iodide
aldehyde
Temp. (ºC)
95/r.t.
Time (h)
2.5/0.5
Product
Yield (%)b
92
N
N
N
2
3
4
5
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
2.5/1.0
1.0/1.0
1.0/0.5
1.0/1.5
91
87
82
83
I
Br

RSC Advances
Page 6 of 11
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
6
7
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
5.0/1.0
80
88
85
94
82
70
75
87
80
78
1.0/0.5
5.0/1.5
0.5/1.0
1.5/2.0
2.0/1.5
3.5/2.0
2.0/0.5
2.0/1.0
2.0/1.0
8
9
N
N
N
Cl
10
11
12
13
14
15
N
N
N
O2N
a The reactions were performed with aryl iodides (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), DBU (30 mol%) and CuI
(20 mol%) in DMSO (5 mL) for 0.5-5.0 h at 95 ºC; and the subsequent reaction of the mixture was added
aldehydes (1.0 mmol) and then was stirred for 0.5-2.0 h at room temperature.
b Isolated yield.
Table 3. Synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles from aryl iodides, sodium azide and alkynes.a
Entry
aryl iodide
alkyne
Temp. (ºC)
Time (h)
Product
Yield (%)b

Page 7 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
N
N
N
1
2
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
2.5/0.5
93
92
90
82
80
83
80
84
94
85
82
88
90
84
2.5/0.5
1.0/1.0
1.0/0.5
1.0/1.0
5.0/1.0
1.0/0.5
5.0/1.5
0.5/1.0
1.5/2.0
2.0/1.5
3.5/2.0
2.0/0.5
2.0/1.0
3
I
Br
4
5
6
7
8
9
N
N
N
Cl
10
11
12
13
14
N
N
N
O2N

RSC Advances
Page 8 of 11
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
15
16
17
18
19
20
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
95/r.t.
2.0/1.0
80
85
92
80
89
82
2.0/1.0
2.0/0.5
5.0/1.0
1.0/1.0
5.0/1.5
a The reactions were performed with aryl iodides (1.0 mmol), sodium azide (1.2 mmol), DBU (30 mol%) and CuI
(20 mol%) in DMSO (5 mL) for 0.5-5.0 h at 95 ºC; and the subsequent reaction of the mixture was added alkynes
(1.0 mmol) and then was stirred for 0.5-2.0 h at room temperature.
b Isolated yield.
Conclusions
In summary, we developed an efficient and simple two-step one-pot protocol for synthesis of
1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles from aryl iodides, sodium azide and phenylacetaldehyde
derivatives or from aryl iodides, sodium azide and alkynes in DMSO using CuI/DBU as the
catalyst system. The established protocol has the advantages of short reaction time and high
yields.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported financially by the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan
province (no. 152102210285 and 152102310312), Innovative Talents Program of Henan Province
(no. 164100510015 and 174100510025), Production-Learning-Research Cooperation Project of
Henan province (no. 122107000014, 142107000081 and 122107000014), Foundation of Henan
Educational Committee (14A350005 and 16A350015), Scientific Research Foundation for
Doctors (no. 01036500508), Youth Foundation (no. 2012QK11) of Henan Normal University.
Supplementary data

Page 9 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
http://dx.doi.org/
References
1
(a) P. W. Baures, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 249; (b) J. O. F. Melo, C. L. Donnici, R. Augusti, M. T.
P. Lopes and A. G. Mikhailovskii, Heterocycl. Commun., 2003, 9, 235; (c) A. C. Tomé, Sci.
Synth., 2004, 13, 415; (d) L. S. Kallander, Q. Lu, W. F. Chen, T. Tomaszek, G. Yang, D. Tew,
T. D. Meek, G. A. Hofmann, C. K. Schulz-Pritchard, W. W. Smith, C. A. Janson, M. D. Ryan,
G. F. Zhang, K. O. Johanson, R. B. Kirkpatrick, T. F. Ho, P. W. Fisher, M. R. Mattern, R. K.
Johnson, M. J. Hansbury, J. D. Winkler, K. W. Ward, D. F. Veber and S. K. Thompson, J.
Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 5644; (e) S. G. Agalave, S. R. Maujan and V. S. Pore, Chem. Asian J.,
2011, 6, 2696; (f) A. Lauria, R. Delisi, F. Mingoia, A. Terenzi, A. Martorana, G. Barone and
A. M. Almerico, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 2014, 3289.
2
V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 2596.
3
4
5
C. W. Tornøe, C. Christensen and M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 3057.
D. B. Ramachary, A. B. Shashank and S. Karthik, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 10420.
(a) E. F. V. Scriven and K. Turnbull, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 297; (b) Q. Liu and Y. Tor, Org.
Lett., 2003, 5, 2571.
6
(a) W. Zhu and D. W. Ma, Chem. Commun., 2004, 888; (b) Q. Cai, W. Zhu, H. Zhang, Y. D.
Zhang and D.W. Ma, Synthesis, 2005, 3, 496.
7
8
J. Andersen, U. Madsen, F. Björkling and X. F. Liang, Synlett, 2005, 14, 2209.
Y. A. Cho, D. S. Kim, H. R. Ahn, B. Canturk, G. A. Molander and J. Ham, Org. Lett., 2009,
11, 4330.
9
A. R. Hajipour and F. Mohammadsaleh, Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 6799.
10 A. R. Hajipour, M. Karimzadeh and S. Ghorbani, Synlett, 2014, 25, 2903.
11 Y. Chen, Z. J. Zhuo, D. M. Cui and C. Zhang, J. Organomet. Chem., 2014, 749, 215.
12 S. R. Lanke and B. M. Bhanage, Synthetic Commun., 2014, 44, 399.
13 (a) L. Wang and C. Cai, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 2010, 3, 121; (b) K. Odlo, E. A. Høydahl
and T. V. Hansen, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 2097; (c) H. Sharghi, R. Khalifeh and M. M.

RSC Advances
Page 10 of 11
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
Doroodmand, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 207; (d) L. Wan and C. Cai, Catal. Lett., 2012,
142, 1134; (e) F. Alonso, Y. Moglie, G. Radivoy and M. Yus, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352,
3208; (f) J. E. de la Cerda-Pedro, Y. A. Amador-Sánchez, M. Cortés-Hernández, J.
Pérez-Pérez, S. Rojas-Lima and H. López-Ruiz, Heterocycles, 2014, 89, 27.
14 (a) K. A. Dururgkar, R. G. Gonnade and C. V. Ramana, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 3974; (b) X.
Q. Xiong, H. X. Chen, Z. K. Tang and Y. B. Jiang, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 9830; (c) P.
Veerakumar, M. Velayudham, K. L. Lu and S. Rajagopal, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 1512;
(d) A. K. Feldman, B. Colasson and V. V. Fokin, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 3897; (e) Y. B. Zhao, Z.
Y. Yan and Y. M. Liang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 1545.
15 Y. Q. Jiang, D. Y. Kong, J. L. Zhao, W. W. Zhang, W. J. Xu, W. Li and G. Q. Xu, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2014, 55, 2410.
16 Z. H. Qin, I. Kastrati, R. E. P. Chandrasena, H. Liu, P. Yao, P. A. Petukhov, J. L. Bolton and G.
R. J. Thatcher, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 2682.
17 (a) R. Balamurugan, N. Naveen, S. Manojveer and M. V. Nama, Aust. J. Chem., 2011, 64,
567; (b) X. Chen, H. L. Zhang, J. P. Chen and H. Gong, Chem. Lett., 2015, 44, 129; (c) D. F.
Li, K. Yin, J. Li and X. S. Jia, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 5918; (d) B. S. Navale and R. G.
Bhat, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 5220; (e) L. Bettanin, G. V. Botteselle, M. Godoi and A. L. Braga,
Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 2014, 7, 105; (f) F. W. Li, Q. L. Suo, H. L. Hong, N. Zhu, Y. Q.
Wang, L. L. Guo and L. M. Han, J. of Supercritical Fluids, 2014, 92, 70; (g) G. L. Cheng, H.
Zhang and X. L. Cui, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 1849.

Page 11 of 11
RSC Advances
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23789D
Graphical Abstract