value.4 This process relies on the catalytic activation of the
CÀC triple bond followed by an attack of an internal
nucleophile. In the past few years, gold complexes have
emerged as powerful catalysts for this purpose.5
Table 1. Obtention of Enantiomerically Pure Fluorinated
2-Iodobenzyl Carbamates 3
To the best of our knowledge, most cycloisomerizations
catalyzed by gold lead to the formation of the isoquinoline
skeleton as a result of a favored 6-endo-dig cyclization.6 In
these cases, the corresponding 5-exo-dig product was not
isolated due to either its instability or its nonformation.6b,c
However, we have found that the gold-catalyzed cyclo-
isomerization of fluorinated o-alkynylaryl carbamates
evolves preferably toward the isoindoline formation, as
opposed to our expectations.
Given our group’s interest in organofluorine chemistry,
we have recently reported a stereoselective synthesis of
fluorinated 1,3-disubstituted isoindolines based on a nucleo-
philic addition/intramolecular aza-Michael reaction tandem
process.7 The choice of Ellman’s (R)-N-(tert-butanesulfinyl)-
imines as chiral auxiliaries was crucial in the achievement
of excellent diastereoselectivities.8 Building on these results,
we envisioned an alternative and more direct route toward
enantioenriched fluorinated isoindoline 5 and isoquinoline 6
scaffolds through a gold(I)-catalyzed intramolecular hydro-
amination reaction as the key step.
Our strategy implies the use of an appropriate building
block to introduce chirality and the fluorinated group into
the molecule at the beginning. Hence, 2-iodobenzyl carba-
mate 3 was regarded as the fluorinated building block of
choice in a first approach.
Starting from Ellman’s (R)-N-(tert-butanesulfinyl)imines
1, selective addition of different fluorinated nucleophiles
(CF3TMS, CF3CF2TMS, PhSO2CF2H, PhSO2CH2F) led
to the expected sulfinyl amines 2 in good yields as single
diastereoisomers (Table 1).9,10
In view of the fact that the stereochemistry of the chiral
auxiliary is known (RS), the absolute configuration of
the newly created stereocenter was determined to be S
entry
2
% yielda
RF
X
Y
3
% yielda (er)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
80
70
71
77
71
83
92
88d
CF3
H
H
H
H
H
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
80 (<99:1)
74 (97:3)
82c
CF3
F
CF3
CF3
OMe
CF3
75 (97:3)
80 (98:2)
60 (99:1)
75c
CF3
OÀCH2ÀO
C2F5
CF2R
CFHR
H
H
H
H
2g
2h
H
H
3g
3h
88d
a Isolatedyield. b Determined bychiralHPLC analysis. c Incompletely
separated enantiomeric mixture. d Obtained as a diastereomeric mixture
(1:2), determined by 19F NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture. R =
SO2Ph.
according to previous reports7,11 and definitely confirmed
by X-ray analysis.12 Since we proved that the cycloisome-
rization did not take place in the presence of the tert-
butanesulfinyl group (t-BuSO), the conversion of t-BuSO
into another nitrogen-protecting group compatible with
the intramolecular hydroamination was required. With
this purpose, chiral intermediates 2 were treated with
4 M HCl in dioxane yielding the corresponding free amines
after basification. Unisolated amines were then protected
ascarbamatesunder standardconditions, giving the fluori-
nated building blocks 3 in good to excellent yields and
enantioselectivities (Table 1).
Next, the functionalization of synthon 3 with selected
terminal acetylenes by means of a typical Sonogashira
cross-coupling reaction afforded alkynyl carbamates 4 in
excellent yields (Table 2). To our delight, the enantioselec-
tivity was well preserved during the process.
According to our synthetic plan, the next step would
be the intramolecular hydroamination reaction catalyzed
by a transition metal complex. In order to find optimum
conditions, alkynyl carbamate (()-4a was subjected to the
intramolecular protocol in the presence of different Lewis
acid catalysts.
(4) (a) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3395. (b)
Kirsch, S. F. Synthesis 2008, 20, 3183. (c) Weibel, J.-M.; Blanc, A.; Pale,
ꢀ
~
P. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3149. (d) Alvarez-Corral, M.; Munoz-Dorado,
M.; Rodrıguez-Garcıa, I. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3174. (e) Gilmore, K.;
Alabugin, I. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 6513.
(5) (a) Zigang, L.; Brouwer, Ch.; He, Ch. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3239.
ꢀ
~
(b) Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3326.
€
(c) Muller, T. E.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Yus, M.; Foubelo, F.; Tada, M. Chem.
ꢀ
Rev. 2008, 108, 3795. (d) Corma, A.; Leyva-Perez, A.; Sabater, M. J.
Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1657.
(6) (a) Obika, S.; Kono, H.; Yasui, Y.; Yanada, R.; Takemoto, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4462. (b) Enomoto, T.; Obika, S.; Yasui, Y.;
Takemoto, Y. Synlett 2008, 11, 1647. (c) Enomoto, T.; Girard, A.-L.;
Obika, S.; Yasui, Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 9158. (d)
Patil, N. T.; Mutyala, A. K.; Lakshmi, P. G. V. V; Raju, P. V. K.;
Sridhar, B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 1999.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(7) (a) Fustero, S.; Moscardo, J.; Sanchez-Rosello, M.; Rodrıguez,
E.; Barrio, P. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5494. (b) Fustero, S.; Rodrıguez, E.;
Herrera, L.; Asensio, A.; Maestro, M. A.; Barrio, P. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
6564.
When the model substrate 4a was treated with CuI,
Pd(OAc)2, or AuCl3, cyclization products were not detected
even after prolonged reaction times (2À3 days).13 Although
(8) For a recent and exhaustive review on tert-butanesulfinamide and
its use in synthesis, see: Robak, M. T.; Herbage, M. A.; Ellman, J. A.
Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3600.
(9) For the asymmetric synthesis of fluoroalkyl amines, see also:
Soloshonok, V. A.; Ono, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3030 and references
cited therein.
(10) Racemic mixtures were prepared in a similar manner starting
from (()-N-(tert-butanesulfinyl)imines 1. For experimental details, see
the Supporting Information.
(11) Krishnamurti, R.; Bellew, B. R.; Prakash, G. K. S. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 984.
(12) Suitable crystals of products 7 (CCDC 916244) and 10 (CCDC
916245) were obtained for X-ray diffracction analysis. For details, see
the Supporting Information.
(13) An in-depth investigation on the reaction conditions was carried
out. See the Supporting Information for a detailed study.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
833