MCRs (IMCR) have been proven to be a promising
strategy to access large chemical space of BDZs.8 As part
of our ongoing interest in the efficient discovery of biolog-
ically active compounds,9 we herein report the design of
diverse BDZ scaffolds via Ugi four-component reactions
(Ugi-4CR) and postcondensation modifications (Scheme 1).
(cyclization) (Scheme 2). The UDC strategy allows the
access of 1,4-benzodiazepine-6-ones 6aÀf with different
substitutions derived from the isocyanide and carboxylic
acid inputs (Table 1).
Table 1. Ugi-4CR Route to 1,4-Benzodiazepine-6-ones 6aÀf
Scheme 1. General Strategy for the Design of Novel BDZ
Scaffolds by Employing Bifunctional Orthogonal Starting
Materials in the Ugi-4CR and Subsequent Intramolecular
Cyclization
ID
R1
R2
yieldsa,b
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
tBu
Me
41%
28%
16%
20%
38%
22%
tBu
cyclohexyl
Me
nPr
mesityl
tBu
tBu
tBu
N-Boc-R-amino-aldehydes have been demonstrated to
be suitable bifunctional starting materials for IMCR.10
Hulme and others utilized the Ugi reaction with N-Boc-R-
amino-aldehydes for a solution phase synthesis of an
array of biologically relevant imidazolines and azepine-
tetrazoles.10,11 Thus, we envisioned novel applications of
Boc-glycinal in the Ugi-4CR for the synthesis of BDZs
utilizing the Ugi-deprotection-cyclization (UDC) strategy.12
Taking advantages of the concise and powerful synthetic
methodologies, this strategy is able to fulfill the drug dis-
covery effort to access uncovered chemical space of BDZs.
Anthranilic acid derivatives have been shown to react in the
Ugi-4CR,13 thus we proposed a synthetic route using methyl
anthranilate 1 as the building block for the synthesis of the
first of four 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffolds (Table 1). In the
first step (Ugi), methyl anthranilate 1 serves as an amine
component for the Ugi-4CR together with an isocyanide 2,
Boc-glycinal 3, and a carboxylic acid 4. The Boc protection
group of 5 is cleaved in the second step (deprotection), and
then the free amine group is condensed with the orthogonal
ester group to form the 1,4-diazepine ring in the third step
cyclopropenyl
pÀF-C6H4
a isolated yields (over three steps). b Method A: (i) MeOH, rt, 2 days;
(ii) DCM (10% TFA), rt, 2 days; (iii) THF, Et3N, triazabicyclodecene
(TBD), 40 °C, overnight.
Aminophenylketones are commonly employed building
blocks for the synthesis of BDZ scaffolds.14 Since amino-
phenylketones have shown good reactivity in MCRs as an
amine component,15 we designed a new UDC strategy for
the rapid access of the second 1,4-benzodiazepine scaffold
starting from aminophenylketones. Initially, aminophe-
nylketones 7 serve as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR
with an isocyanide 2, Boc-glycinal 3, and a carboxylic acid
4. Microwave irradiation was utilized for the Ugi-4CR
to reduce the reaction time.16 In most cases, microwave
was applied when the Ugi product was not able to be
isolated under the convential condition. In the second step,
the deprotected amino group is immediately cyclized
with the ketone functionality to form 1,4-diazepine ring.
A small focused library of 1,4-benzodiazepines 9aÀh with
four points of diversity was obtained using this convenient
method (Table 2).
Encouraged by the previous results, the UDC strategy
was further applied for the synthesis of the third 1,4-
benzodiazepine scaffold. In the first step, aminophenyl-
ketones 7 serve as an amine component for the Ugi-4CR
with an isocyanide 2, Boc-glycinal 3, and trimethyl azide
10. Microwave assisted Ugi-4CRs proceeded in a reaction
time of only 30 min compared to the conventional meth-
odology which required up to 48 h. In the second step, the
deprotected amino group immediately cyclizes with the
ketone functionality to form a 1,4-diazepine ring. A group
€
(8) Huang, Y.; Domling, A. In Isocyanide Chemistry; Nenajdenko, V.,
Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2012; pp 431À450.
(9) Khoury, K.; Sinha, M. K.; Nagashima, T.; Herdtweck, E.;
€
Domling, A. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. 2012, 51, 10280.
(10) (a) Nixey, T.; Hulme, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6833.
(b) Kercher, T.; Rao, C.; Bencsik, J. R.; Josey, J. A. J. Comb. Chem.
2007, 9, 1177.
(11) (a) Hulme, C.; Ma, L.; Romano, J.; Morrissette, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 7925–7928. (b) Nixey, T.; Kelly, M.; Semin, D.; Hulme, C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3681.
(12) Keating, T. A.; Armstrong, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
2574.
(13) for other examples of UDC, see: (a) Umkehrer, M.; Kolb, J.;
Burdack, C.; Ross, G.; Hiller, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6421.
(b) Bonnaterre, F.; Bois-Choussy, M.; Zhu, J. Beil. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
4, 10. (c) Ilyin, A. P.; Parchinski, V. Z.; Peregudova, J. N.; Trifilenkov,
A. S.; Poutsykina, E. B.; Tkachenko, S. E.; Kravchenko, D. V.;
Ivachtchenko, A. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2649.
(14) (a) Chung, C.-w.; Coste, H.; White, J. H.; Mirguet, O.; Wilde, J.;
Gosmini, R. L.; Delves, C.; Magny, S. M.; Woodward, R.; Hughes,
S. A.; Boursier, E. V.; Flynn, H.; Bouillot, A. M.; Bamborough, P.;
Brusq, J.-M. G.; Gellibert, F. J.; Jones, E. J.; Riou, A. M.; Homes, P.;
Martin, S. L.; Uings, I. J.; Toum, J.; Clement, C. A.; Boullay, A.-B.;
Grimley, R. L.; Blandel, F. M.; Prinjha, R. K.; Lee, K.; Kirilovsky, J.;
Nicodeme, E. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3827. (b) Lecinska, P.; Corres,
(15) (a) Gordon, C. P.; Young, K. A.; Hizartzidis, L.; Deane, F. M.;
McCluskey, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1419. (b) He, P.; Nie, Y.-B.;
Wu, J.; Ding, M.-W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1429. (c) Marcaccini,
S.; Pepino, R.; Pozo, M. C.; Basurto, S.; Garcia-Valverde, M.; Torroba,
T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3999.
N.; Moreno, D.; Garcıa-Valverde, M.; Marcaccini, S.; Torroba, T.
´
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 6783.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 23, 2012
(16) Tye, H.; Whittaker, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 813.
5917