Job/Unit: I20798
/KAP1
Date: 29-10-12 16:30:43
Pages: 8
M. Maschke, M. Lieb, N. Metzler-Nolte
FULL PAPER
137.1, 122.4 (CHtriazole), 122.1, 84.2, 74.1 (CF3), 71.4 (unsubstituted
Cp-Ring), 71.3 (substituted Cp-Ring), 71.1 (substituted Cp-Ring),
was set to 0 mV as the reference potential for all measurements.
Ferrocene was used as an internal reference for the scan rate at
50 mVs–1 and used as an external reference for all other scan rates
to avoid an overlap of the corresponding redox processes.
70.9 (substituted Cp-Ring), 70.9, 50.7 (CH ) ppm. IR (solid): ν =
˜
2
2922 ν(C–H); 1735 ν(C–Caromatic); 1376–1206, 1100 ν(C–F) cm–1.
MS (EI): m/z = 479 [M]+ , 245[Cp2 RuCH2 ]+ , 185 [Fc –
H]+, 167 [CpRu]+.
The electrochemical behavior of all four triazoles 6–9 was examined
by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at five different scan rates (50, 100,
250, 500 and 1000 mVs–1).
Compound 10: An oven-dried 50 mL flask was charged with a stir
bar and triazole 7 (0.022 g, 0.051 mmol) in dichloromethane
(20 mL). Boc-Leu-OH (0.016 g, 0.069 mmol), EDC (0.018 g,
0.094 mmol) and DMAP (0.0087 g, 0.094 mmol) were added con-
secutively to the heterogeneous mixture and stirred vigorously for
1 d at room temp. The reaction mixture was washed three times
with water, dried with MgSO4 and the solvents evaporated in
vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
(silica Merck 60) using a mixture of n-hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1).
Complex 10 was obtained as an orange oil (0.02 g, 0.031 mmol,
61%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 7.72 (s, 1 H, CHtriazole), 5.08–4.29
(m, 9 H, CpH9), 4.66 (t, 2 H, CpH2), 1.70 (m, 3 H), 1.44 (s, 9 H,
3 CH3), 0.98 (s, 3 H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3 H, CH3) ppm. 19F NMR
(CDCl3): δ = –71 (t, 3 F, CF3), –72 (t, 3 F, CF3) ppm. 13C NMR
(CDCl3): δ = 137.1, 122.4, (CHtriazole) 84.2, 74.1 (CF3), 71.4 (unsub-
stituted Cp-Ring), 71.3 (substituted Cp-Ring), 71.1 (substituted
Cp-Ring), 70.9 (substituted Cp-Ring), 51.7 (CH2) ppm. ESI-MS
(pos. mode, 70 eV): m/z = 767.9 [M + H]+, 790.9 [M + Na]+. Exact
mass of complex cation: 766.54.
Cytotoxicity Assays: MCF-7, HT-29, PT-45 and GM5657 cells
were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal
calf serum (FCS), 2 mm l-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/mL), and
streptomycin (100 μg/mL) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Crystal violet
assay was applied to determine the absolute cell numbers. All cells
were seeded in 96-well cell-culture treated microtiter plates (MTP)
and grown for 24 h under standard conditions. All tested com-
pounds were dissolved in cell culture medium with 0.5% dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) and applied to the cells in 1, 5, 20, 50, 100,
500 μm concentrations for 72 h. Cells were fixed with 4% glutaral-
dehyde in 2% water for 25 min at room temp. Membranes were
permeabilized by Triton X-100 (0.1%) in PBS for 10 min. and then
aqueous crystal violet solution (0.04%) was added to the cells. Af-
ter 30 min of mechanical shaking, the cells were washed five times
with water and the crystal violet was eluted with 70% EtOH for
3 h. Absorbance was detected at 570 nm (Tecan Sapphire 2 micro-
plate reader). The cell mass was plotted against the concentration.
IC50 were calculated from the sigmoidal function.
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-(1-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)propan-2-
ol (11): Column chromatography: n-hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1). Col-
orless solid (0.1 g, 0.32 mmol, 77%); Rf = 0.5 (n-hexane/ethyl acet-
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): GC–MS spectra of compounds 6–9.
1
ate, 4:1). H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 8.15 (s, 1 H, CHtriazole), 7.77 (d,
J = 7.49 Hz, 2 H), 7.61–7.53 (m, 3 H) 5.35 (s, 1 H, OH) ppm. 19F
NMR (CDCl3): δ = –77.7 (s, 6 F) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ =
Acknowledgments
136.9, 135.3, 129.1, 128.9, 123.1, 120.0 ppm. IR (solid): ν = 3154,
˜
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG), Research Unit FOR630, “Biological Function of Organo-
metallic Compounds”; www.rub.de/for630). M. M. wishes to thank
the Ruhr-University Research School for financial support. The
authors are grateful to Dr. Klaus Merz for solving the X-ray crystal
structures and to Dr. Malay Patra for providing (azidomethyl)-
ruthenocene. Thanks also go to Annegret Knüfer for the cytotoxi-
city test and to Dr. Nicolas Plumere for providing the electrochemi-
cal setup.
2932, 2853 ν(C–H); 1597–1257, 1059 ν(C–F) cm–1. MS (EI): m/z =
311 [M]+, 214 [M – (CF)3COH]+.
Determination of LogP Values by RP-HPLC: The RP-HPLC
method of Minick and co-workers was used for LogP determi-
nation.[19] All values were determined on a Reprosil-Par C 18-AQ,
5 μm ϫ250 mmϫ4.6 mm column. The water layer was saturated
with octanol. As eluents, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid
buffer (MOPS, 0.02 m, pH 7.4) with n-decylamine (0.15% v/v) and
MeOH with n-octanol (0.25% v/v) were used. In order to calibrate
the system 4-methoxyaniline, 4-bromoaniline, naphthalene and
tert-butylbenzene were eluted at six isocratic eluent concentrations
(60% to 85% of MeOH in 5% increments). The retention times,
together with the dead times obtained from uracil, were used to
calculate the corresponding capacity factors kЈ H2O/MeOH ratio.
The extrapolation to 100% H2O (0% MeOH) gave the logkw value
for each standard. All four logkw values of the reference com-
pounds were plotted against the literature logP values of the refer-
ence compounds to obtain a linear function that correlates both
parameters. This function was used to determine all logP values
from their logkw values, which were measured in the same way as
those for the references.
[1] a) G. Gasser, I. Ott, N. Metzler-Nolte, J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54,
3–25; b) D. R. van Staveren, N. Metzler-Nolte, Chem. Rev.
2004, 104, 5931–5986; c) A. Nguyen, A. Vessires, E. A. Hillard,
S. Top, P. Pigeon, G. Jaouen, Chimia 2007, 61, 716–724; d) M.
Salmain, N. Metzler-Nolte, in Ferrocenes (Ed.: P. Stepnicka),
John Wiley and Sons, Chinester, 2008, pp. 499–639; e) G. Gas-
ser, N. Metzler-Nolte, Curr. Opinion Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 84–
91.
[2] a) C. Heidelberger, N. K. Chaudhuri, P. Danneberg, D. Mo-
oren, L. Griesbach, R. Duschinsky, R. J. Schnitzer, E. Pleven,
J. Scheiner, Nature 1957, 179, 663–666; b) A. Vermes, H.-J. Gu-
chelaar, J. Dankert, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 171–
179.
[3] G.-V. Röschenthaler, Nachr. Chem. 2005, 53, 743–746.
[4] C. Rhode, J. Lemke, M. Lieb, N. Metzler-Nolte, Synthesis
2009, 12, 2015–2018.
[5] A. E. Feiring, J. Fluorine Chem. 1977, 10, 375–386.
[6] H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn, K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. 2001,
113, 2056; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021.
[7] A. K. Diallo, S. Menuel, E. Monflier, J. Ruiz, D. Astruc, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4617–4619.
Electrochemical Measurements: An electrochemical micro volume
cell with a stationary glassy carbon working electrode (Ø = 3 mm),
Ag/AgCl in aq. KCl (3 m) as reference electrode and a platinum
wire (Ø = 2 mm) as counter electrode were used. All electrochemi-
cal measurements were undertaken with 5 mL of 0.1 mm solutions
of the respective trifluoromethylated metallocene triazole in aceto-
nitrile. CV of ferrocene was performed in the same electrolyte solu-
tion, and the electrochemical half-wave potential E1/2 of the redox
couple ferrocene/ferrocenium FcH0/+ vs. Ag/AgCl (E1/2) (270 mV)
[8] a) A. L. C. Hansch, Substituent Constants for Correlation
Analysis in Chemistry and Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New
6
www.eurjic.org
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0