Y. Brusentsev et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 1112–1115
1115
R
H
H
R
MeO
OH
OH
cat.
OH
PhCHO
ZnEt2
cat. =
MeO
Ti(OiPr)4
R'
R'
MeO
OMe
Scheme 5. Diethylzinc addition to benzaldehyde (test reaction).
conformation which is crucial for the formation of metal com-
plexes and catalytic activity (Fig. 2).
Acknowledgements
To evaluate these novel 1,4-diol structures the well-known
TADDOL-catalyzed diethylzinc addition to benzaldehyde9 was em-
ployed as a preliminary model reaction.
However, diol 4b showed reverse selectivity in comparison to
the corresponding (ꢀ)-R,R-TADDOL (Scheme 5). The major isomer
in the reaction catalyzed by our diols was shown to be R in contrast
to the S-isomer formed in the (ꢀ)-TADDOL-catalyzed reaction.9
Despite the fact that the selectivity was only moderate, for
example: ꢁ20% ee with 4b as the catalyst, the observed phenom-
ena are of considerable interest.
The unsymmetrical structure of 4b is, however, not directly
comparable with TADDOLs and it can be assumed that the aro-
matic substituent at position seven has a major influence on the
catalyst structure and hence on the induction of enantioselectivity.
However, these results could be a good starting point for further
investigation of lignan-based chiral ligands.
The authors would like to thank the Academy of Finland for the
financial support, UPM Ltd for support with starting materials and
the Finnish IT Center for Science for providing computational re-
sources. Mr. Markku Reunanen is thanked for recording HRMS
spectra.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (full experimental and spectral data) asso-
ciated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
1. Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Heckel, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 92–138.
2. Terada, M. Synthesis 2010, 12, 1929–1982.
3. Erdtman, H. Liebigs Ann. 1934, 513, 229–239.
4. Freudenberg, K.; Knof, L. Chem. Ber. 1957, 90, 2857–2869.
5. Holmbom, B.; Eckerman, Ch.; Eklund, P.; Hemming, J.; Nisula, L.; Reunanen, M.;
Sjöholm, R.; Sundberg, A.; Willför, S. Phytochem. Rev. 2003, 2, 331–340.
In conclusion, the TADDOL-like chiral 1,4-diols (5a–c and 4b)
were synthesized from the natural lignan hydroxymatairesinol.
Furthermore, the addition reaction to the highly substituted lac-
tones 6a and 6b was studied in detail. This showed that substituted
butyrolactones form stable hemiketals, which has not been previ-
ously discussed in the literature. The steric hindrance and the for-
mation of a stable hemiketal structure prevented the synthesis of
the tetra-substituted 1,4-diol derivatives, unless a methyl was used
as the alkyl group. The structures and the conformation of the diols
were studied both by NMR spectroscopy and computational meth-
ods. The structural properties of these diols were mostly deter-
mined by the conformation of the six-membered non-aromatic
ring and the 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl substituent at position seven.
The 1,4-diol 4b was proven to work as a chiral ligand and there-
fore the study of these diols as well as the synthesis of other lig-
nan-based diols, phosphines, and phosphoric acids is ongoing in
our laboratory.
ˇ
6. Ito, Y. N.; Ariza, X.; Beck, A. K.; Bohác, A.; Ganter, C.; Gawley, R. E.; Kühnle, F. N.
M.; Tuleja, J.; Wang, Y. M.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1994, 77, 2071–2109.
7. Analytical data for compound 4b: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) d ppm 0.50 (s, 3H,
9Me), 0.65 (s, 3H, 9Me), 1.26 (s, 3H, 9Me), 1.58 (s, 3H, 9Me), 2.29 (ddd, J = 12.1,
6.8, 3.0 Hz, 1H, H8), 2.38 (dd, J = 14.0, 12.1 Hz, 1H, H7), 2.60 (dd, J = 14.0, 6.8 Hz,
1H, H7), 2.64 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, H8), 3.78 (s, 3H, 3OMe), 3.81 (s, 3H, 3OMe), 3.83
(s, 3H, 4OMe), 3.92 (s, 3H, 4OMe), 4.06 (s, 1H, H7), 6.40 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H,
H6), 6.56 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, H2), 6.59 (s, 1H, H6), 6.71 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H5), 6.75
(s, 1H, H3). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) d ppm 23.86 (9Me), 25.7 (9Me), 30.72
(C7), 30.78 (9Me), 31.62 (9Me), 44.96 (C8), 46.87 (C7), 52.69 (C8), 55.86 (OMe),
55.91 (OMe), 55.94 (OMe), 55.94 (OMe), 72.83 (C9), 73.8 (C9), 110.94 (C5),
111.02 (C3), 111.62 (C2), 112.38 (C6), 120.07 (C6), 130.32 (C1), 131 (C2), 136.84
(C1), 147.15 (C4), 147.69 (C5), 147.78 (C4), 148.9 (C3). HRMS (ESI): calcd for
C
26H36NaO6 [M+Na]+ 467.2410; found 467.2430. ½a 2D0
+67° (c = 1, CHCl3).
ꢂ
Values for the H–H coupling constants for 4b were calculated from the 1H NMR
spectral data using the PERCH software.
8. Sandberg, T.; Brusentsev, Y.; Eklund, P.; Hotokka, M. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2011,
111, 4309–4317.
9. Schmidt, B.; Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1321–1323.