Organic Letters
Letter
observed when compared to the use of isolated hemiaminal 6.
Finally, the introduced tether could be removed easily by
treatment with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) followed by
methanolysis to give the ammonium salt in quantitative yield
(Scheme 4, eq 3).
Table 1. Amino-Alkynylation and -Arylation of Substituted
Allylic Alcohols
In conclusion, we have reported the first carboamination of
allylic alcohols based on the use of a trifluoroacetaldehyde
tether. Both alkynylation and arylation products could be
obtained in good yield and diastereoselectivity, giving amino
alcohol derivatives with complementary substitution patterns
compared to those obtained from allylic amines. The
hemiaminal tethers were easily introduced and could be
removed in a single step to give amino alcohols in quantitative
yields. These results further highlight the versatility of tethers
derived from trifluoroacetaldehyde and set the basis for the
development of further highly selective transformations of
olefins in future works.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures and analytical data for all new
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is supported by the Swiss National Science
Foundation (Grant No. 200021_159920).
■
To further increase the efficiency of the carboamination
process, we then investigated if the hemiaminal tether could be
installed in situ. Both the aminoalkynylation and -arylation were
indeed successful in the one-pot process, and products 8a and
10f were obtained in 64% and 62% yield, respectively (Scheme
4, eqs 1 and 2). Nevertheless, a significant decrease in yield was
REFERENCES
■
(1) Lumbroso, A.; Cooke, M. L.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2013, 52, 1890.
(2) Selected examples: (a) Engman, L. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2394.
(b) Fujita, M.; Kitagawa, O.; Suzuki, T.; Taguchi, T. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 7330. (c) Donohoe, T. J.; Johnson, P. D.; Helliwell, M.;
Keenan, M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2078. (d) Donohoe, T. J.;
Chughtai, M. J.; Klauber, D. J.; Griffin, D.; Campbell, A. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2514. (e) Donohoe, T. J.; Callens, C. K. A.;
Lacy, A. R.; Winter, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 655. (f) Lei, A.;
Lu, X.; Liu, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1785. (g) Schmidt, V. A.;
Alexanian, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11402. (h) Liu, G.-S.;
Zhang, Y.-Q.; Yuan, Y.-A.; Xu, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3343.
(i) Huang, D.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Cai, Y.; Liu, W.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2013, 135, 8101. (j) Xu, F.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, S.; Yan, X.; Xu, H.-C. Chem.
- Eur. J. 2014, 20, 12740. (k) Unsworth, W. P.; Lamont, S. G.;
Robertson, J. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 7388.
Scheme 4. In Situ Tether Formation and Tether Removal
(3) Bergmeier, S. C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2561.
(4) (a) Baeckvall, J.-E.; Bystroem, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1126.
(b) Alexanian, E. J.; Lee, C.; Sorensen, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 7690. (c) Liu, G. S.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7179.
(d) Martinez, C.; Wu, Y.; Weinstein, A. B.; Stahl, S. S.; Liu, G.; Muniz,
K. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 6309. (e) Zhu, H.; Chen, P.; Liu, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1766.
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX