arenes exhibit sluggish reactivity of CꢀH activation.
Decarboxylation provids a complementary approach
to obtain carbon nucleophiles (CNs).9,10 Carboxylates
and a series of variants are cheap and easy to obtain sub-
strates for cross-coupling reactions.
Gratifyingly, when the reaction of 1a with 1.2 equiv of 2a
wasconductedina DMSO/toluene (1:20) solvent systemat
100 °C in the presence of 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 and 1 equiv
of Ag2CO3, the yield of the desired product 3a was 83%
(entry 1).10d,e Pd(TFA)2 (5 mol %) could slightly increase
the yield of the product (entry 2). Further investigation of
the oxidants led to the discovery that Ag2CO3 was the best
oxidant for this transformation (entries 3ꢀ5). In contrast
to DMSO/toluene (1:20) solvent system, the use of more
polar solvents, such as DMSO/DMF (1:20) and dioxane,
resulted in a decreased yield of 3a with amount of the
protodecarboxylation byproduct formed (entries 6 and 7).
It might be because decarboxylation was too fast in polar
solvent. The reactivity decreased if the reaction tempera-
ture was elevated or decreased (see the Supporting Infor-
mation for details), and the oxidative dehydration of 3a
couldbedetectedwhen2equivofAg2CO3 wasusedorwhen
this reaction went through under air (entries 8 and 9).12
In 2002, Myers reported the first example of the de-
carboxylative Heck-type reaction. However, the alkenes
were limited to the active olefins such as R,β-unsaturated
olefins and styrene (eq 1).10a In 2009, Su reported a
decarboxylative Heck-type reaction using the electroni-
cally nonbiased olefins as the substrates (eq 2).10d,e Herein,
we directly utilized allylic alcohols as coupling partners
with benzoic acids as the carbon nucleophils to obtain
β-aryl ketones and aldehydes (eq 3).11
The inspection of the coupling reaction between 2,6-
dimethoxybenzoic acid (1a) and allyl alcohol (2a) was
chosen as a model reaction for the optimization studies
(Table 1). Initially, we examined the feasibility of this
model reaction using the reaction conditions, which were
previously established for the decarboxylative Heck reaction.
Table 1. Impact of Reaction Parametersa
entry catalyst
oxidant
solvent v/v
yieldb (%)
1
Pd(OAc)2 Ag2CO3
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2CO3
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2O
Pd(TFA)2 AgOAc
DMSO/toluene =1:20
DMSO/toluene =1:20
DMSO/toluene =1:20
DMSO/toluene =1:20
83
2
85 (81)
61
3
4
76
5
Pd(TFA)2 O2 (1 atm) DMSO/toluene =1:20
NR
46
6
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2CO3
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2CO3
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2CO3
Pd(TFA)2 Ag2CO3
DMSO/DMF = 1:20
DMSO/dioxane =1:20
DMSO/toluene =1:20
DMSO/toluene =1:20
7
37
(8) (a) Kuhl, N.; Hopkinson, M. N.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Glorius, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10236.
8c
9d
59
80(75)
(9) (a) Gooβen, L. J.; Deng, G.; Levy, L. M. Science 2006, 313, 662.
(b) Cornella, J.; Righi, M.; Larrosa, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
9429. (c) Hu, P.; Zhang, M.; Jie, X.; Su, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012,
51, 227. (d) Wang, C.; Piel, I.; Glorius, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
4194. (e) Bhadra, S.; Dzik, W. I.; Gooβen, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 9938. (f) Shang, R.; Yang, Z.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.-L.; Liu, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14391. (g) Dzik, W. I.; Lange, P. P.; Gooβen,
L. J. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2671. (h) Cui, Z.; Shang, X.; Shao, X.-F.; Liu,
Z.-Q. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2853. (i) Zhang, Y.; Patel, S.; Mainolfi, N.
Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 3196. (j) Hu, J.; Zhao, N.; Yang, B.; Wang, G.; Guo,
L.-N.; Liang, Y.-M.; Yang, S.-D. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5516.
(10) Examples for decarboxylative Heck reactions: (a) Myers, A. G.;
Tanaka, D.; Mannion, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11250. (b)
Tanaka, D.; Romeril, S. P.; Myers, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
10323. (c) Zhang, S.-L.; Fu, Y.; Shang, R.; Guo, Q.-X.; Liu, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 638. (d) Fu, Z.; Huang, S.; Su, W.; Hong, M. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 4992. (e) Hu, P.; Su, W.; Hong, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
2341. (f) Sun, Z.-M.; Zhao, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6726. (g)
Voutchkova, A.; Coplin, A.; Leadbeater, N. E.; Crabtree, R. H. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 47, 6312.
a Reactions were carried out under N2, with 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.2
equiv), Ag2CO3 (0.5 mmol), Pd(II) (0.025 mmol), solvent (3 mL), 100 °C.
b Determined by GC using dodecane as the internal standard. The yield
of isolated product is shown in parentheses. c Ag2CO3 (1 mmol) was
used. d Under air.
With the optimized conditions in hand, we started
employing other substrates to this Pd-catalyzed Heck-type
reaction. First, various aryl-substituted allylic alcohols
were employed to couple with 2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
(Scheme 1). A series of para-substituted 1-phenylprop-2-
en-1-ols, including some with electron-donating groups
(R0 = Me, OMe) and some with electron-withdrawing
groups (R0 = F, Cl, CF3), were converted into the corre-
sponding β-aryl ketones in moderate yields (Scheme 1,
3bꢀg). Other substituted 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ols were
also suitable substrates for this transformation to afford
the corresponding products 3hꢀj in good yields. To our
delight, the furan-substituted allyl alcohol was tolerated in
(11) (a) Wen, Y.; Huang, L.; Jiang, H.; Chen, H. J. Org. Chem. 2012,
77, 2029. (b) Chen, M.; Wang, J.; Chai, Z.; You, C.; Lei, A. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2012, 354, 341. (c) Crawley, M. L.; Phipps, K. M.; Goljer, I.;
Mehlmann, J. F.; Lundquist, J. T.; Ullrich, J. W.; Yang, C.; Mahaney,
P. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1183. (d) Melpolder, J. B.; Heck, R. F. J. Org.
Chem. 1976, 41, 265. (e) Briot, A.; Baehr, C.; Brouillard, R.; Wagner, A.;
Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1374. (f) Pan, D.; Chen, A.; Su,
Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, S.; Jia, W.; Xiao, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Jiao, N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4729. (g) Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.-Q. Org. Lett.
€
2012, 14, 74. (h) Tietze, L. F.; Nobel, D. C. T.; Spescha, M. Ang. Chem.
(12) (a) Diao, T.; Wadzinski, T. J.; Stahl, S. S. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 887.
(b) Gao, W.; He, Z.; Qian, Y.; Zhao, J.; Huang, Y. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3,
883. (c) Izawa, Y.; Pun, D.; Stahl, S. S. Science 2011, 333, 209.
Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2259. (I) Aslam, M.; Elango, V.; Davenport, K. G.
Synthesis 1989, 11, 869.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX