ChemComm
Communication
Advanced Computing Core (VACC) for computer hardware
resources and Frank Neese (MPI Mu¨lheim) for providing the
ORCA 2.9.1 software package.
Notes and references
§ Crystal data of 2a: C15H14ClN3O6,
M = 367.74, monoclinic,
a = 13.7923(7), b = 5.9508(3), c = 19.9335(11) Å, U = 1608.44(15) Å3,
T = 173(2) K, space group P21/c (no.14), Z = 4, 24909 reflections
measured, 2947 unique (Rint = 0.0287) which were used in all calcula-
tions. The final Ro (F2) was 0.1178 (all data).
1 (a) K. E. Sapsford, L. Berti and I. L. Medintz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 4562–4588; (b) K. Kikuchi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39,
2048–2053.
2 H. Sasabe and J. Kido, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 621–630.
3 M. Gaal, E. List and U. Scherf, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 4236–4237.
4 J. D. Bower and G. R. Ramage, J. Chem. Soc., 1957, 4506–4510.
5 (a) G. Jones and D. R. Sliskovic, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 1983, 34,
79–143; (b) G. Jones, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 2002, 83, 1–70.
6 L. Cosgrave, M. Devocelle, R. J. Forster and T. E. Keyes, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 103–105.
Fig. 3 COSMO/PBE/TZVP TDDFT-computed HOMO, LUMO, and TDDFT differ-
ence densities of 2a and 2b in H2O. Green indicates a loss of electron density
upon excitation at 380 nm, and red indicates a gain of electron density.
7 R. Kuhn and W. Mu¨nzing, Chem. Ber., 1952, 85, 29–37.
´
´
´
8 (a) T. Soos, G. Hajos and A. Messmer, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62,
´
´
´
1136–1138; (b) M. Beres, G. Hajos, Z. Riedl, T. Soos, G. Timari and
A. Messmer, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 5499–5503; (c) A. Kottschy,
´
´
J. Farago, A. Csampai and D. M. Smith, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60,
3421–3425; (d) G. Bentabed-Ababsa, F. Blanco, A. Derdour,
orbital overlap of the HOMO and LUMO in 2b compared to 2a,
resulting in a more intense UV/Vis transition.
The TDDFT calculations also clarify the origin of the broad
bandshapes in the UV/Vis and fluorescence spectra of 2a and
´
´
F. Mongin, F. Trecourt, G. Queguiner, R. Ballesteros and
B. Abarca, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 163–169.
9 A. Martin, C. Long, R. J. Forster and T. E. Keyes, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 5617–5619.
10 R. Kuhn and W. Mu¨nzing, Chem. Ber., 1953, 86, 858–862.
´
2b. One way to visualize the electron density redistribution in 11 (a) A. Messmer and A. Gelleri, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1965,
´
4, 154; (b) A. Messmer and O. Sziman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1965, 4, 1074; (c) A. Messmer and A. Gelleri, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
the excited state is a TDDFT difference density difference plot
(Fig. 3). This plot shows that the UV/Vis transition in 2a has
´
Engl., 1967, 6, 261–262.
significant charge transfer character with electron density being 12 A. M. Amer, Monatsh. Chem., 1998, 129, 1293–1303.
´
ˇ ´
´
´
13 M. Lacan, K. Jakopcic, V. Rogic, S. Damoni and I. Tabakovic, Synth.
Commun., 1974, 4, 219–224.
donated by the phenyl substituent to the triazolopyridinium
unit. In contrast, the altered LUMO in 2b means that the UV/Vis
transition in this compound may be better described as a
p-p*. Consequently, we expect significant differences between
the triazolopyridinium and phenyl p-bond strengths in the ground
and excited electronic states, especially for the charge transfer
transition of 2a. These perturbations of the triazolopyridinium
and phenyl p-systems are expected to introduce a significant
vibronic structure into the UV/Vis and fluorescence bands, which
is apparently unresolved in the room temperature UV/Vis and
fluorescence spectra of 2a and 2b.
14 (a) S. M. Landge and I. Aprahamian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
18269–18271; (b) X. Su and I. Aprahamian, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
30–33; (c) X. Su, T. F. Robbins and I. Aprahamian, Angew. Chem., Int.
´
Ed., 2011, 50, 1841–1844; (d) S. M. Landge, E. Tkatchouk, D. Benıtez,
D. A. Lanfranchi, M. Elhabiri, W. A. Goddard, III and I. Aprahamian,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9812–9823; (e) X. Su, T. Lessing and
I. Aprahamian, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2012, 8, 872–876; ( f ) D. Ray,
J. T. Foy, R. P. Hughes and I. Aprahamian, Nat. Chem., 2012, 4,
757–762; (g) Y. Yang, R. P. Hughes and I. Aprahamian, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2012, 134, 15221–15224.
15 (a) M. Kirchgessner, K. Sreenath and K. R. Gopidas, J. Org. Chem.,
2006, 71, 9849–9852; (b) D. P. Kenndy, C. D. Incarvilo and
S. C. Burdette, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 916–923; (c) J. Jo, H. Y. Lee,
W. Liu, A. Olasz, C.-H. Chen and D. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
16000–16007.
In summary, we have shown the synthesis of two new
[1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridinium salts from 2-pyridylphenyl-
hydrazones via a novel Cu(II)-mediated oxidative ring clousure
16 L. P. Battaglia, M. Carcelli, F. Ferraro, L. Mavilla, C. Pelizzi and
G. Pelizzi, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 2651–2654.
reaction. The synthesized mono-(2a) and bis-(2b) triazolopyridiums 17 W. Yan, Q. Wang, Q. Lin, M. Li, J. L. Petersen and X. Shi, Chem.–Eur.
J., 2011, 17, 5011–5018.
18 J. Eriksen and C. Foote, J. Phys. Chem., 1978, 82, 2659–2662.
19 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77,
are water soluble, show blue fluorescence, possess broad emission
profiles and exhibit mega Stokes shifts. Since the positive charge
center of the triazolopyridinium ring can be susceptible to nucleo-
philic attack,8c,23 these compounds can be promising in terms of
anion sensing, which is currently being looked into.
This work was supported by Dartmouth College (XS and IA),
the Burke Research Initiation Award (IA) and the University of
Vermont (Startup funds to MDL). We acknowledge Dr Richard
Staples (Michigan State University) for X-ray analysis, the Vermont
3865–3868.
¨
20 A. Schafer, H. Horn and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 97,
2571–2577.
21 S. Sinnecker, A. Rajendran, A. Klamt, M. Diedenhofen and F. Neese,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 2235–2245.
22 The experimental and calculated excitation wavelengths are different
because of the limitations of the TDDFT formalism.
´
23 A. Gelleri, A. Messmer, S. Nagy and L. Radics, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1980, 21, 663–666.
c
4162 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4160--4162
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013