Communication
ChemComm
with addition of radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1- References
oxyl (TEMPO), the formation of 11 from ynamide cation radical I
1 For selected reviews, see: (a) K. A. DeKorver, H. Li, A. G. Lohse,
R. Hayashi, Z. Lu, Y. Zhang and R. P. Hsung, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
5064–5106; (b) G. Evano, A. Coste and K. Jouvin, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2010, 49, 2840–2859; (c) Y.-C. Hu, Y. Zhao, B. Wan and
Q.-A. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 2582–2625; (d) Y.-B. Chen,
P.-C. Qian and L.-W. Ye, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 8897–8909;
(e) C. C. Lynch, A. Sripada and C. Wolf, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49,
8543–8583; ( f ) F.-L. Hong and L.-W. Ye, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53,
2003–2019; (g) J. Luo, G.-S. Chen, S.-J. Chen, J.-S. Yu, Z.-D. Li and
Y.-L. Liu, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 13978–13992.
2 For selected reviews, see: (a) B. Zhou, T.-D. Tan, X.-Q. Zhu, M. Shang
and L.-W. Ye, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 6393–6406For recent representa-
tive examples, see: (b) V. Debrauwer, A. Turlik, L. Rummler,
A. Prescimone, N. Blanchard, K. N. Houk and V. Bizet, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2020, 142, 11153–11164; (c) M. Moskowitz and C. Wolf, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 3402–3406; (d) C. Yao, J. Yang, X. Lu,
S. Zhang and J. Zhao, Org. Lett., 2020, 22, 6628–6631; (e) X. Hu,
X. Xie, Y. Gan, G. Wang and Y. Liu, Org. Lett., 2021, 23, 1296–1301.
3 For recent representative examples, see: (a) T. Ito, S. Harada,
H. Homma, H. Takenaka, S. Hirose and T. Nemoto, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2021, 143, 604–611; (b) G. Zhu, W.-C. Gao and X. Jiang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 1334–1340; (c) Z. Zeng, H. Jin, M. Rudolph,
F. Rominger and A. S. K. Hashmi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57,
16549–16553; (d) C. Shu, Y.-H. Wang, B. Zhou, X.-L. Li, Y.-F. Ping,
X. Lu and L.-W. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 9567–9570.
4 For selected reviews, see: (a) C. Mahe and K. Cariou, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2020, 362, 4820–4832; (b) T.-D. Tan, Z.-S. Wang, P.-C. Qian
and L.-W. Ye, Small Methods, 2021, 5, 2000673.
and TEMPO was detected by ESI-MS analysis (Scheme 2 and
Fig. S1, ESI†). Moreover, N-allylynamide 1a (irreversible half-peak
ox
potential, E = 1.58 V vs SCE) possesses much lower oxidation
1/2
ox
1/2
potential than 2,6-lutidine N-oxide does (E = 1.82 V vs SCE).
Based on the aforementioned results, it is more feasible that the
generation of ynamide cation radical I from photocatalyzed
single-electron oxidation of N-allylynamide 1a may initiate this
photoinduced transformation. Given the high excited-state
reduction potential of catalyst Mes-Acr-PhBF4 (Erꢀed ¼ 2:20 V),12
the pathway of photoinduced single-electron oxidation of 2,
6-lutidine N-oxide cannot completely be excluded at this stage.7
Herein, in accordance with the experimental evidence and our
previous work,6 a plausible mechanism is proposed in Scheme 2.
We hypothesized that the N-allylynamide 1 could be formally
oxidized by the excited acridinium photocatalyst affording a yna-
mide cation radical I. Subsequent nucleophilic a-addition of the
resultant cation radical I by 2,6-lutidine N-oxide would lead to the
formation of the key oxypyridinium tethered vinyl radical intermedi-
ate II. Alternatively, a photoinduced single-electron oxidation of 2,
6-lutidine N-oxide is also possible. Nevertheless, subsequent radical
addition of ene-ynamide 1 and 2,6-lutidine N-oxide radicals would
generate the oxypyridinium tethered vinyl radical intermediate II as
well. Guided by the reported experimental and computational
studies of radical ring closure,14 we propose that the vinyl radical
may undergo a 5-exo-trig radical cyclization with tethered alkene
producing intermediate III. This open-shell radical is subsequently
trapped intramolecularly by the enol frame to close the cyclopropane
ring forming a ketyl radical IV. The resultant intermediate IV could
then undergo a b-N–O bond scission yielding the oxygenative
cyclopropanation product 2 and 2,6-lutidine radical cation. Based
on the literature survey and our experimental results, it is proposed
that the acridine radical Mes-Acr could be oxidized by O2 regenerat-
5 For recent representative examples, see: (a) Z.-S. Wang, Y.-B. Chen,
H.-W. Zhang, Z. Sun, C. Zhu and L.-W. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020,
´
142, 3636–3644; (b) K. de la Vega-Hernandez, E. Romain, A. Coffinet,
K. Bijouard, G. Gontard, F. Chemla, F. Ferreira, O. Jackowski and
A. Perez-Luna, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 17632–17642;
(c) S. Dutta, R. K. Mallick, R. Prasad, V. Gandon and A. K. Sahoo,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 2289–2294.
6 J. P. Markham, B. Wang, E. D. Stevens, S. C. Burris and Y. Deng,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2019, 25, 6638–6644.
7 Wu’s report of vinyl radical generation via photoredox enabled
oxidation of alkynes with pyridine N-oxides: J.-H. Xu, W.-B. Wu
and J. Wu, Org. Lett., 2019, 21, 5321–5325.
8 For selected representative examples, see: (a) K. Gajcy, S. Lochynski
and T. Librowski, Curr. Med. Chem., 2010, 17, 2338–2347;
(b) K. S. MacMillan and D. L. Boger, J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52,
5771–5780; (c) D. L. Boger and D. S. Johnson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 1995, 92, 3642–3649; (d) F. P. Bymaster, K. Golembiowska,
M. Kowalska, Y. K. Choi and F. I. Tarazi, Synapse, 2012, 66, 522–532.
9 For recent representative examples, see: (a) X. Huang, M. H. Nguyen,
M. Pu, L. Zhang, Y. R. Chi, Y.-D. Wu and J. S. Zhou, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 10814–10818; (b) H. Deng, W.-L. Yang, F. Tian,
W. Tang and W.-P. Deng, Org. Lett., 2018, 20, 4121–4125;
ing acridinium Mes-Acr+ and superoxide O2ꢁ 12,15 The strongly basic
.
superoxide should readily reduce the 2,6-lutidine radical cation,
although the 2,6-lutidine radical cation intermediate might be
capable of catalyst turnover. Another putative pathway with direct
reduction of ketyl radical IV by reactive superoxide and subsequent
N–O bond scission may account for the product formation as well.
In summary, we have developed a photoinduced oxidative
cyclopropanation of ene-ynamides via photocatalytically gener-
ated vinyl radical involved radical cascades. The protocol provides
´
´
´
´
(c) A. Lopez-Rodrıguez, G. Domınguez and J. Perez-Castells, J. Org.
Chem., 2019, 84, 924–933; (d) R. Liu, G. N. Winston-McPherson,
Z.-Y. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Song, I. A. Guzei, X. Xu and W. Tang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8201–8204.
´
˜
´
10 (a) A. Puet, G. Domınguez, F. J. Canada and J. Perez-Castells,
ACS Omega, 2020, 5, 31821–31830; (b) D. V. Yarmoliuk,
D. Serhiichuk, V. Smyrnov, A. V. Tymtsunik, O. V. Hryshchuk,
Y. Kuchkovska and O. O. Grygorenko, Tetrahedron Lett., 2018, 59,
4611–4615.
a
convenient metal-free access to a variety of valuable
3-aza[n.1.0]bicycles. Notably, this photocatalytic strategy of catio-
nic vinyl radical generation and the successful radical trapping by
the tethered alkene demonstrates its synthetic potential of devel-
oping versatile cascade/tandem radical transformations. Further
investigation of this transformation and the expansion of this
strategy with other radical acceptors to allow the synthesis of
molecular complexity are currently underway.
11 For selected reviews see: (a) N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz, Chem.
Rev., 2016, 116, 10075–10166; (b) K. A. Margrey and D. A. Nicewicz,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 1997–2006.
12 N. A. Romero, K. A. Margrey, N. E. Tay and D. A. Nicewicz, Science,
2015, 349, 1326–1330.
´
13 X. Chen, S. A. Ruider, R. W. Hartmann, L. Gonzalez and N. Maulide,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 15424–15428.
14 (a) U. Wille, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 813–853; (b) N. F. O’Rourke,
K. A. Davies and J. E. Wulff, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 8634–8647;
(c) K. Gilmore and I. V. Alabugin, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 6513–6556.
15 K. Ohkubo, K. Mizushima, R. Iwata and S. Fukuzumi, Chem. Sci.,
2011, 2, 715–722.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 5254–5257 | 5257