Our original retrosynthetic strategy centered on 1,2-
dicarbonyl tautomer 3, which was isolated along with the
spirobacillenes and has been proposed as a potential bio-
synthetic precursor.2 We considered that the site-selective
oxidation of 3 would allow access to either natural prod-
uct following spirocyclization (Scheme 1). This approach
is appealing, as both targets could be accessed from a
single, relatively simple precursor. Similar spirocycliza-
tions are known to take place under acidic conditions,6
adding support to the idea that this approach may be
biomimetic and, furthermore, the high levels of iron-rich
heavy metals that contaminate the environment that the
Lysinibacillus fusiformis was obtained from may help to
promote the requisite oxidation.7
during its isolation.2 An alternative synthetic strategy was
therefore proposed, focusing solely on the synthesis of
spirobacillene A. It was hoped that ynone 11, which is at
the same oxidation state as the initially required 1,2-
diketone, could be used as a synthetic equivalent. Such
ynones are usually stable and are far easier to synthesize
than the analogous 1,2-diketones. Furthermore, the ynone
moeity should provide a greater degree of regiocontrol
in the spirocyclization, compared with the corresponding
diketone.
Scheme 2. Attempted Formation of 10 and Ynone 11 as a
Synthetic Equivalent
Scheme 1. Proposed Biomimetic Route to the Spirobacillenes
Electrophilic cyclization reactions of alkynes have at-
tracted increasing attention in recent years.9 One such
transformation, the iodonium/bromonium-induced intra-
molecular ipso-cyclization of electron-rich aromatics onto
ynone derivatives, first reported by Larock and co-
workers10 and subsequently modified by others,11 ap-
peared particularly well suited to the synthesis of the
spirobacillene A framework. We envisioned that a simple
ynone 14 would undergo cyclization (via iodonium ion 15)
to generate spirocycle 16 which, following conversion of
the iodide into a hydroxyl, would provide a rapid, high
yielding synthesis of the target molecule 1 (Figure 2).
The synthesis began with iodination and Boc-protection
of indole to form iodide 1812 in excellent yield over the two-
step telescoped sequence (Scheme 3). Sonogashira cou-
pling with trimethylsilyl acetylene followed by TMS clea-
vage then afforded alkyne 19,13 again in excellent yield
over the two-step sequence. Next, the treatment of 19 with
n-butyllithium followed by Weinreb amide 20 afforded
In order to test this approach, alkene 8 and 1,2-diol 9
were synthesized using a previously reported route, de-
scribed during the synthesis of the related natural product
diolmycin A1 (7, Figure 1).3 It was then hoped to convert
one of these compounds into diketone 10, a protected
analogue of diketone tautomer 3. However, all attempts to
generate diketone 10 failed; a number of methods were
examined,8 but all resulted in the formation of complex
mixtures of unidentified products (Scheme 2). This result
was disappointing, although not entirelyunexpected, given
that the related compound 3 was reported to be unstable
(5) (a) Klein, J. E. M. N.; Perry, A.; Pugh, D. S.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 3446. (b) Klein, J. E. M. N.; Taylor, R. J. K. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 6821. (c) Bastin, R.; Dale, J. W.; Edwards, M. G.; Papillon,
J. P. N.; Webb, M. R.; Taylor, R. J. K. Tetrahedron 2011, 51, 10026.
(6) (a) Iwata, C.; Fusaka, T.; Fujiwara, T.; Tomita, K.; Yamada, M.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 463. (b) Nagao, Y.; Lee, W. S.;
Jeong, I.-Y.; Shiro, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2799. (c) Hashmi,
A. S. K.; Schwartz, L.; Bolte, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8969. (d)
Minamitsuji, Y.; Maruyama, A.; Hirose, S.; Dohi, T.; Kita, Y. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 3559. (e) Snyder, S. A.; Sherwood, T. C.; Ross, A. G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5146.
(7) Gregg, D. J.; Ollagnier, C. M. A.; Fitchett, C. M.; Draper, S. M.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3043.
(8) DessÀMartin periodinane and Swern oxidation methods were
trialled, in addition to the procedures found in the following: (a) Amon,
C. M.; Banwell, M. G.; Gravattpp, G. L. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4851.
(b) Khurana, J. M.; Kandpal, B. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4909. (c)
Plietker, B. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 289.
(9) Godoi, B.; Schumacher, R. F.; Zeni, G. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111,
2937 and references therein.
(10) Zhang, X.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12230.
(11) (a) Tang, B.-X.; Tang, D.-J.; Tang, S.; Yu, Q.-F.; Zhang, Y.-H.;
Liang, Y.; Zhong, P.; Li, J.-H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1063. (b) Yu, Q.-F.;
Zhang, Y.-H.; Yin, Q.; Tang, B.-X.; Tang, R.-Y.; Zhong, P.; Li, J.-H.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3658. (c) Tang, B.-X.; Yin, Q.; Tang, R.-Y.; Li,
J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9008. (d) Dohi, T.; Kato, D.; Hyodo, R.;
Yamashita, D.; Shiro, M.; Kita, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
3784. (e) Low-Beinart, L.; Sun, X.; Sidman, E.; Kesharwani, T. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1344.
(12) Mothers, C.; Lavielle, S.; Karoyan, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
6706.
(13) Trost, B. M.; Dyker, G.; Kulawiec, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 7809.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX