Table 1. Optimization of the 1,2-Addition Reaction of Boronic
Esters (1) and Trifluoroborate Salts (2)a
Scheme 1
for the Rh-catalyzed addition in view of the stereochemical
effect. In the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, β-borylated carbonyl
compounds were reported to display an intriguing stereo-
chemical inversion by the coordinating carbonyl group, as
opposed to the usual retention of configuration.4b,c Herein,
we investigated the rhodium-catalyzed 1,2-addition of chiral
alkylboronic esters to aldehydes that produce γ-butyrolac-
tones after cyclization of the resulting adducts (Scheme 1).
Our initial investigation involved carrying out the reac-
tion of boronic esters (1a, 1b) with p-nitrobenzaldehyde.
The enantiomerically enriched boronic esters were easily
prepared by following a developed protocol for the asym-
metric conjugate boration of R,β-unsaturated carbonyl
compounds6 while the corresponding trifluoroborate salts
(2) were prepared by following procedures reported in the
literature.7 Reactions of 1 and 2 were carried out in the
presence of 5 mol % [RhCl(cod)]2 in 1,4-dioxane and H2O
(7:1) at 80 °C, followed by an acid treatment (Table 1).
With pinacol boronic ester 1a itself, no substantial conver-
sion was observed under the reaction conditions (entry 1).
When the reaction was carried out in the presence of CsF
as an additive, both the yield and es8 (∼70%) increased
(entry 2), but significant racemization was still observed.
Furthermore, in the absence of water, the yield signifi-
cantly decreased as well as the es value, indicating the
importance of water in this addition (entry 3).
dr
sub-
additive
(equiv)
yield
(3-cis:
(%)b 3-trans)c
esd (%) of es (%) of
entry strate
3-cis
3-trans
1
1a
No rxn
2
1a CsF (2)
1a CsF (2)
2a
77
29
82
1.2:1 (3a)
1.2:1 (3a)
1.2:1 (3a)
1.2:1 (3a)
1.5:1 (3b)
1.5:1 (3b)
68
19
98
98
98
98
77
1
3e
4
97
97
94
94
5f
6
7f
1a KHF2 (1.2) 80
2b 87
1b KHF2 (1.2) 85
a 5 mol % [RhCl(cod)]2 (0.01 mmol) and 1.5 equiv of 1 or 2
(0.3 mmol) relative to p-nitrobenzaldehyde (0.2 mmol) were stirred in
1,4-dioxane and H2O (7:1, 2 mL) at 80 °C for 24 h. b Isolated yield of 3-cis
and 3-trans. c The diastereomeric ratio (dr) was determined by HPLC
analysis or by 1H NMR analysis. d Enantiospecificity. e Anhydrous
1,4-dioxane was used. f 5 mol % [RhCl(cod)]2 (0.01 mmol), 1.2 equiv of
p-nitrobenzaldehyde (0.24 mmol) relative to 1a or 2a (0.2 mmol) were used.
of the trifluoroborate salts, we evaluated different addi-
tives in the hopes of identifying more effective additives
than CsF in the reaction of the pinacol boronic esters.
When KHF2 was employed in the reaction, the desired
reaction took place with a high efficiency. After further
optimization of the reaction conditions, we demon-
strated that the use of 1.2 equiv of p-nitrobenzaldehyde
and 1.2 equiv of KHF2, relative to the pinacol boronic
esters, led to results comparable to the reactions using
excess trifluoroborate salts, generating products in good
yields with high es values (compare entries 5 and 7 vs 4
and 6). Again, the addition products were produced
without stereoinversion.
Diastereoselection of the addition was not high, and a
slight preference for the cis product was obtained as
indicated by the diastereomeric ratios of the 3-cis and
3-trans products (1.2À1.5:1), which did not vary much
under the different conditions. The exact boron species
that participates in the reaction remains unclear. Only a
few studies of the use of KHF2 salt in combination with
arylboronic acids (sp2CÀB) have been reported10 so far,
while no examples have been reported on the use of the salt
Then, we changed the boronic esters to trifluoroborate
salts (2a, 2b), expecting a more efficient transmetalation.
The addition products were obtained in good yields with
high es values (entries 4 and 6). Most interestingly, the chiral
center was completely retained9 and no stereoinversion was
observed. To eliminate the preparation and isolation steps
(6) (a) Mun, S.; Lee, J.-E.; Yun, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4887–4889. (b)
Lee, J.-E.; Yun, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 145–147. (c) Sim,
H.-S.; Feng, X.; Yun, J. Chem.ÀEur. J. 2009, 15, 1939–1943. (d) Feng,
X.; Yun, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6577–6579. (e) Chen, I.-H.; Yin, L.;
Itano, W.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
11664–11665. (f) Feng, X.; Yun, J. Chem.ÀEur. J. 2010, 16, 13609–
13612.
(7) (a) Vedejs, E.; Chapman, R. W.; Fields, S. C.; Lin, S.; Schrimpf,
M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3020–3027. (b) Batey, R. A.; Thadani,
A. N.; Smil, D. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4289–4292. (c) Cazorla, C.;
Metay, E.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 8615–8621.
(8) The enantiospecificity calculated using the following equation [% es =
(ee of product/ee of starting material) Â 100] indicates the degree of
conservation of the enantiomeric purity over the course of the reactions:
Denmark, S. E.; Vogler, T. Chem.ÀEur. J. 2009, 15, 11737–11745. Also
see ref 4b.
(9) The absolute configurations of the addition products (3a-cis and
3a-trans) were determined by comparing optical rotation data reported
in the literature (see Scheme 2). In addition, hydrogenation of 3f-cis and
3f-trans gave (S)-5a, confirming the retention of the configuration of the
original stereogenic center. The other products in Table 2 were assigned
by analogy.
(10) (a) Wang, Z.-Q.; Feng, C.-G.; Zhang, S.-S.; Xu, M.-H.; Lin,
G.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5780–5783. (b) Yang, H.-Y.; Xu,
M.-H. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 9223–9225.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX