polymers9 exhibit low fluorescence quantum efficiency,
which is mainly caused by πꢀπ stacking of their planar
backbones.10 In order to achieve high fluorescence quan-
tum efficiency in solid state, bulky groups are usually
incorporated to decrease πꢀπ interactions.11 Recently,
Ma et al. found that triphenylamine (TPA) contained small
donorꢀacceptor (DꢀA) molecules exhibited high fluores-
cence in solid state, which was attributed not only to the
bulky TPA skeleton but also to the intercrossed excited
state between the low-lying local exciton (LE) and charge
transfer (CT) exciton resulting from the DꢀA structure.12
On the other hand, the bandgap of DꢀA conjugated
systems is usually small and can be tuned conveniently by
changing donor and acceptor groups to achieve desired
emission.13
Scheme 1. Synthetic Routes to T-Shaped DꢀA Molecules 1-1,
1-2, 1-3, 1-2, 2-2, and 3-2
Scheme 1 illustrates the synthetic approaches to the
T-shaped DꢀA polycyclic molecules, 1-1, 2-1, 3-1, 1-2,
2-2, and 3-2. 4,7-Dibromo-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole was
reduced by NaBH4 in ethanol to afford 4 in 80% yield.
Condensation reactions between 4 and different 1,2-
diketone derivatives afforded compounds 5, 6, and 7, res-
pectively. A Suzuki coupling reaction between 5, 6, 7
and 4-(diphenylamino)phenylboronic acid catalyzed by
Pd(PPh3)4 afforded T-shaped molecules 1-1, 2-1, and 3-1.
Following the same Suzuki coupling procedure, 1-2, 2-2,
and 3-2 were also obtained using 5, 6, and 7 reacting them
with p-methoxyphenylboric acid as references. The distribu-
tions of the donor arms in horizontal direction and the
acceptor core in vertical direction facilitated the modifica-
tion of the donor and the acceptor segments independently
through different methods.
Figure 1. Design strategy and structures of the T-shaped DꢀA
molecules 1-1, 2-1, and 3-1.
Herein, we developed a series of T-shaped polycyclic
DꢀA molecules containing two electron-donor arms
and an electron-acceptor core. As shown in Figure 1, the
quinoxaline unit is chosen as the acceptor core, due to its
strong electron-withdrawing properties.14 To narrow the
bandgap to achieve red emission, different aromatic cores
are fused to the quinoxaline unit to enlarge the conjugated
length.15 In addition, bulky triphenylamine (TPA) donor
arms are connected to the acceptor backbone due to their
strong electron-donating property, which can further red-
shift their emission. Furthermore, these TPA-contained
DꢀA molecules may efficiently use the excitation energy
arising from the intercrossed excited state (LE and CT).12
The absorption and emission spectra of all T-shaped
DꢀA polycyclic molecules 1-1, 2-1, 3-1, 1-2, 2-2, and 3-2
were measured in dilute CH2Cl2 solution (1 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M)
(Figures 2 and S1 and S2 in Supporting Information [SI]).
Figure 2a shows the absorption spectra of 1-1, 2-1, and 3-1
in dilute CH2Cl2 solution. Note that these three com-
pounds with the same donor arms exhibited similar ab-
sorption characteristics which was divided into three main
parts. Taking 3-1 as an example, the first absorption band
above 450 nm is attributed to the CT absorption. The
second band, peaking at 425 nm, comes from πꢀπ*
transition of the acceptor core. This is concluded from
the absorption spectra of 3-1 and 3-2, which have the same
acceptor core as shown in Figure 2b. The short wavelength
band (280ꢀ300 nm) originates from the nꢀπ* transition
(9) Hoeben, F. J. M.; Jonkheijm, P.; Meijer, E. W.; Schenning,
A. P. H. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1491.
(10) (a) Cornil, J.; Beljonne, D.; Calbert, J.-P.; Bredas, J.-L. Adv.
ꢀ
€
Mater. 2001, 13, 1053. (b) Wurthner, F. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1564.
(11) Langhals, H.; Krotz, O.; Polborn, K.; Mayer, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2427.
(12) (a) Yang, B.; Kim, S.-K.; Xu, H.; Park, Y.-I.; Zhang, H.; Gu, C.;
Shen, F.; Wang, C.; Liu, D.; Liu, X.; Hanif, M.; Tang, S.; Li, W.; Li, F.;
Shen, J.; Park, J.-W.; Ma, Y. ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 2601. (b) Li, W.;
Liu, D.; Shen, F.; Ma, D.; Wang, Z.; Feng, T.; Xu, Y.; Yang, B.; Ma, Y.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2797.
(13) Roncali, J. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 173.
(14) (a) Chang, D. W.; Lee, H. J.; Kim, J. H.; Park, S. Y.; Park, S.-M.;
Dai, L.; Baek, J.-B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3880. (b) Zhang, Y.; Zou, J.; Yip,
H.-L.; Chen, K.-S.; Zeigler, D. F.; Jen, A. K.-Y. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23,
2289.
(15) Gang, Q.; Wang, Z. Y. Chem. Asian J. 2010, 5, 1006.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX