ChemComm
Communication
In contrast, the C-glycosylation between 23 and 12 was less success-
ful, as only trace amount of the digitoxose isomer was observed.
In summary, the convergent de novo synthesis of vineomycinone
B2 methyl ester was accomplished in only 14 steps with 4.0% overall
yield in the longest linear sequence, which is a highly efficient route
comparing the shortest previous synthesis (16 steps) of 1.5 The route
shows the efficiency of the convergent de novo synthesis of coupling
partners for a late stage convergent C-glycosylation followed by a
single step deprotection–oxidation to yield the natural product. It is
interesting to note that while this is the first synthesis of vineomy-
cinone B2 methyl ester that uses asymmetric catalysis to install all of
the stereocenters, in terms of overall synthetic efficiency it compares
quite favorably with the elegant work of Martin and predecessors.5
Having this improved stereo-divergent assess to vineomycinone B2
methyl ester, its diastereomer and congeners should further enable
their biochemical/medicinal chemistry study. Further vineomycins
synthetic/biological investigations are ongoing and will be reported
in due course.
Scheme 5 Synthesis of the aglycon 23.
We are grateful to NIH (GM090259), NSF (CHE-1213596) and
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (QC, grant
21242002) for their financial support of this research.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. Rohr and R. Thiericke, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1992, 9, 103–137;
(b) K. Krohn and J. Rohr, Top. Curr. Chem., 1997, 188, 127–195;
(c) L. Andriy, V. Andreas and B. Andreas, Mol. BioSyst., 2005, 1, 117–126.
¯
¯
2 (a) S. Omura, H. Tanaka, R. Oiwa, L. Awaya, R. Masuma and K. Tanaka,
J. Antibiot., 1977, 30, 908–916; (b) N. Imamura, K. Kakinuma, N. Ikekawa,
H. Tanaka and S. Omura, J. Antibiot., 1981, 34, 1517–1578.
3 R. B. Weiss, G. Sarosy, K. Clagett-Carr, M. Russo and B. Leyland-
Jones, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 1986, 18, 185–197.
¨
4 (a) P. Kricke, PhD thesis, University Gottingen, 1984; (b) K. Krohn and
Scheme 6 Synthesis of vineomycinone B2 methyl ester (1).
W. Baltus, Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 49–54; (c) T. Matsumoto, H. Jona,
M. Katsuki and K. Suzuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 5103–5106.
5 (a) D. J. Danishefsky, B. J. Uang and G. Quallich, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1985, 107, 1285–1293; (b) M. A. Tius, J. Gomez-Galeno, X. Gu and
J. H. Zaidi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 8188–8189; (c) M. A. Tius,
J. Gomez-Galeno, X. Gu and J. H. Zaidi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113,
5775–5783; (d) V. Bolitt, C. Mioskowski, R. O. Kollah, S. Manna,
D. Rajapaksa and J. R. Falck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 6320–6321;
(e) T. Matsumoto, M. Katsuki, H. Jona and K. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1991, 113, 6982–6992; ( f ) C.-L. Chen, S. M. Sparks and
S. F. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 13696–13697.
6 (a) X. Yu and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4529–4532. For
related approaches, see: (b) X. Yu, M. Li and G. A. O’Doherty,
Heterocycles, 2011, 82, 1577–1584; (c) A. Sobti, K. K. Kim and
G. A. Sulikowski, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 6–7; (d) K. Sasaki,
S. Matsumura and K. Toshima, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 6982–6986;
(e) M. Zhou and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2283–2286;
( f ) M. Zhou and G. A. O’Doherty, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2485–2493;
(g) M. Zhou and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 4339–4342.
7 (a) Md. M. Ahmed and G. A. O’Doherty, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46,
4151–4155; (b) D. Balachari and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2000, 2,
863–866; (c) D. Balachari and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2000, 2,
4033–4036; (d) D. Balachari, L. Quinn and G. A. O’Doherty, Tetra-
hedron Lett., 1999, 2, 4769–4773.
8 Q. Chen, M. Mulzer, P. Shi, P. J. Beuning, G. W. Coates and
G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 6592–6595.
9 A. Fujii, S. Hashiguchi, N. Uematsu, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 2521–2522.
10 (a) M. Li, J. G. Scott and G. A. O’Doherty, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45,
1005–1009; (b) M. Li and G. A. O’Doherty, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45,
6407–6411.
11 H. Guo and G. A. O’Doherty, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 5211–5220.
12 (a) R. S. Babu and G. A. O’Doherty, J. Carbohydr. Chem., 2005, 24,
169–177; (b) H. Guo and G. A. O’Doherty, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3921–3924.
reduced quinone ring protected as a bis-methyl ether (Scheme 5). The
revised synthesis began with an MOM protection of 3, then in situ
dithionate reduction of 21 to an anthraquinol intermediate, followed
by methylation (KOH/Me2SO4) to give 22 in 63% yield. Finally
deprotection of 22 gave the bis-phenol 23 in 90% yield.
With the second-generation C-glycosylation coupling partner in
hand, we turned our focused on the C-glycosylation of 23 with 12 and
17 (Scheme 6). To our delight, treatment of a 1 : 1 mixture of 17 and
23 under the typical Suzuki conditions (Cp2HfCl2/AgClO4) led to
formation of the desired b-C-glycoside 24 as a single regio- and
diastereo-isomer in 48% yield. While the reaction is envisaged
as proceeding through an O- to C-glycoside rearrangement,5 no
evidence of an O-glycoside product was detected. A clue as to how
to best complete the synthesis came from careful observation of the
crude reaction mixture. Specifically, under the Lewis acid conditions
of the C-glycosylation reaction one can observe the conversion of the
acid sensitive starting material 23 into a corresponding anthraqui-
none. As a result, a one-pot per-deprotection–oxidation was realized
with the exposure of 24 to excess BBr3. The bis-debenzylation, bis-
demethylation and subsequent air oxidation of an anthraquinol
intermediate afforded vineomycinone B2 methyl ester 1 in 88% yield.
This synthetic material had physical and spectroscopic data in good
agreement with literature values (e.g., [a]2D0 = +109 (c = 0.27, dioxane),
[a]D29 = +118 (c = 1.05, dioxane),5e [a]D24 = +109.8 (c = 0.00091, CDCl3)).5f
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun.