corresponding amine would be a byproduct.12 Takasu and
co-workers reported the synthesis of quinolines via a Povarov
reaction and hydrogen transfer reaction using triflic imide
as an autotandem catalyst.13
(5a) of 1,4-phenylenediamine (1) should be isolated as the
major product. However, if the aromatization of the quino-
line ring is the dominating process (thermodynamic control),
then 6-benzylamino-2,4-diphenylquinoline (4a) should be
isolated as the major product (Scheme 1). Upon conducting
this reaction with the substrate stoichiometry required for
Recently, Gaddam et al. reported the synthesis of iso-
meric ellipticine derivatives via a Povarov reaction with
an imine as an oxidant.14 When the imine acts as an oxidant,
an equimolar amount of amine and aldehyde substrates
are exhausted which directly affects the atom economy
of the reaction. To the best of our knowledge, synthesis of
privileged 6-aminoquinoline derivatives is not reported in
the literature via a tandem multicomponent approach. With
our continued interest in multicomponent reactions for
the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds,15 we envisioned
that the synthesis of 6-aminoquinolines can be achieved via
a Povarov reaction and intramolecular hydrogen transfer.
In the present study, we wish to report the unprecedented
tandem multicomponent synthesis of 6-aminoquinoline
derivatives via a Povarov reaction, dehydrogenation, and
imine reduction sequence (Scheme 1) and their subsequent
use in the synthesis of symmetrical and unsymmetrical
anthrazolines or pyrido[2,3-g]quinolines.
the bis-Povarov product (5a) in the presence of BF3 Et2O
3
(5 mol %) in refluxing acetonitrile for 14 h, compound 4a
was isolated in 32% yield (Scheme 2). In addition to 4a, the
bis-Povarov product (5a, traces) and the mono-Povarov
product 2,4-diphenylquinolin-6-amine (6a, 18% yield) were
also identified in the product mixture. Surprisingly, N,N0-
dibenzyl-1,4-phenylene diamine, the transfer hydrogenation
product from the diimine, was not detected in the reaction
mass. Thus, it became clear that the Povarov cycloaddition
followed by the dehydrogenation and hydrogenation reac-
tion is the major process occurring under the employed
conditions. Also, the isolation of compound 6a was a surprise
based on the amount of benzaldehyde used; the correspond-
ing benzylideneimine (Schiff base) would have been a more
reasonable product from which 6a is likely a decomposition
product. It was realized that the formation of 4a required
substrates 1, 2, and 3 in the ratio 1:2:1 as opposed to the
1:2:2 requirement for the bis-Povarov reaction. At this point
we decided to optimize the conditions for the formation of
N-benzyl-6-amino-2,4-diphenylquinoline (4a) by varying the
substrate stoichiometry, solvent, catalyst, temperature, and
time. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Scheme 1. Retroanalysis for N-Benzyl-6-amino-2,4-diphenyl-
quinoline
Scheme 2. Reaction of Diamine with Benzaldehyde and Acetylene
Using BF3 Et2O
3
With the use of 1,4-phenylenediamine (1), benzaldehyde
(2), and phenylacetylene (3) as our model Povarov reaction
substrates, we were interested in understanding the kinetics
of the reaction ; whether the Povarov cycloaddition is a
kinetically controlled process and if it outcompetes the
dehydrogenation/hydrogenation reaction or if these pro-
cesses happen in tandem. It should be noted that dehydro-
genation and concomitant hydrogenation reactions, which
lead to aromatization of the quinolone ring, are secondary
processes which occur after the initial Povarov reaction. If
the Povarov cycloaddition is the faster process then the bis-
Povarov product 2,4,7,9-tetraphenylpyrido[2,3-g]quinoline
When substrates 1, 2, and 3 in a ratio of 1:2:1.5 were
reacted in the presence of BF3 Et2O (5 mol %) in acetoni-
3
trile at reflux for 14 h, compound 4a was isolated in 36%
yield (Table 1, entry 1). Prolonging the reaction times did
not help to improve the yields. By increasing the catalyst
loading to 20%, the yield of 4a increased to 44% (Table 1,
entry 2). Along with 4a, 5a (7%) and 6a (21%) were also
isolated from this reaction. However, a further increase in
the catalyst loading resulted in an inseparable mixture of
compounds. Several other Lewis and Bronsted acids,
namely aluminum chloride (AlCl3), p-toluenesulfonic acid
(p-TSA), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and acetic acid were
also screened as catalysts. AlCl3 and p-TSA resulted in
poor yields of 4a (Table 1, entries 3ꢀ4). Use of TFA as a
catalyst resulted in a mixture of components with trace
amounts of the desired compound 4a (Table 1, entry 5),
and no desired product was observed in the case of acetic
acid (Table 1, entry 6). Transition metal triflates have
proved to be efficient Lewis acid catalysts for the synthesis
of several important biologically active heterocyclic
(12) (a) Leardini, R.; Nanni, D.; Tundo, A.; Zanardi, G.; Ruggieri, F.
ꢁ
ꢁ
J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1842. (b) Kouznetsov, V. V.; Melendez Gomez,
ꢁ
C. M.; Urbina Gonzalez, J. M.; Stashenko, E. E.; Bahsas, A.; Amaro
Luis, J. J. Het. Chem. 2007, 44, 551. (c) Tanaka, S. Y.; Yasuda, M.; Baba,
A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 71, 800. (d) Kobayashi, S.; Ishitani, H.;
Nagayama, S. Chem. Lett. 1995, 423 and references cited therein.
(13) (a) Shindoh, N.; Tokuyama, H.; Takasu, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 4749. (b) Shindoh, N.; Tokuyama, H.; Takemoto, Y.; Takasu,
K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7451.
(14) Gaddam, V.; Ramesh, S.; Nagarajan, R. Tetrahedron 2010, 66,
4218.
(15) (a) Pericherla, K.; Khungar, B.; Kumar, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2012, 53, 1253. (b) Kumar, A.; Rao, V. K. Synlett 2011, 2157. (c)
Vaughan, D.; Jha, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5709–5712. (d) Huang,
P. -J. J.; Stanley Cameron, T.; Jha, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 51. (e)
Jha, A.; Beal, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8999. (f) Jha, A.; Huang,
P. -J. J.; Mukherjee, C.; Paul, N. K. Synlett 2007, 3127.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX