alkynyl amino esters and allenoates using an umpoled
N-addition to a β,γ-alkynyl R-imino ester followed by
electrophilic R- or γ-addition. Moreover, we also found
an alternative R-quaternary alkynyl amino ester synthesis
utilizing the addition to the iminium salts formed by the
oxidation of the intermediary enolates.
Table 1. Optimization of N-Ethylation/R-Acetylationa
As an initial reaction, ethyl-2-((4-methoxyphenyl)imino)-
4-phenylbut-3-ynoate 1a first reacted with ethylmagne-
sium bromide and subsequently with acetyl chloride
in THF at À78 °C to rt for 24 h (Table 1, entry 1).5b
Gratifyingly, the reaction proceeded as expected to give
the desired R-addition product 2a in 64% yield. To find
optimum reaction conditions, we next screened the
amount of Grignard reagent, additives, and reaction times,
which are summarized in Table 1. First, the amount of
nucleophile was examined (entries 1À3). An excess of
Grignard reagent led to a slight improvement in the yield
of 2a (entries 2 and 3). Additives such as molecular sieves
x
time
(h)
yield
(%)b
entry equiv
additive
1
1.5
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.1
3.0
1.1
none
none
none
24
24
24
24
2
64
69
66
59
69
74
80
79
70
66
57
65
2
3
˚
4
MS 4 A (1.3 g/mmol)
5
none
6
none
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
24
0.5
7
none
˚
4 A, 1,10-phenanthroline, TMEDA, and TMSCl were not
8
none
effective (entries 4, 10À12), while shortening the reaction
time increased the product yields (entries 5 and 6). These
results indicated that 2a was relatively unstable under the
reaction conditions. The amount of Grignard reagent was
next reexamined (entries 7À9), and a satisfactory product
yield was obtained using 1.1 equiv of Grignard reagent in
THF at À78 °C to rt for 30 min (entry 8).
9
none
10
11
12
1,10-phenanthroline (0.7 equiv)
TMEDA (3.0 equiv)
TMSCl (1.1 equiv)
a The reaction was carried out according to the general procedure
(Supporting Information (SI)). b Isolated yield.
The scope of substrates, electrophiles, and nucleophiles
was next examined under the optimized reaction condi-
tions, and the results are summarized in Table 2. Use of
acetyl bromide was not effective in this reaction (entry 2).
Acyl chlorides having linear aliphatic groups such as acetyl
and propionyl chlorides underwent the desired reaction
to give the products 2a, 2b in high yields (entries 1 and 3),
while those having branched aliphatic groups such as
isobutyryl and pivaloyl chlorides decreased the yield or
gave no product, presumably because of the steric hin-
drance (entries 4 and 5). Aromatic and heteroaromatic
acid chlorides also afforded the desired products 2e, 2f in
moderate to high yields (entries 6 and 7). Ethyl chloroform-
ate and crotonoyl chloride gave the products 2g, 2h
in high yields (entries 8 and 9). The substrates having
aromatic substituents with electron-withdrawing groups
or an aliphatic substituent afforded the desired products
2iÀk in high yields (entries 10À12). We also found that
silyl substituents were efficient for this reaction to give the
products 2lÀp in high yields (entries 13À17). The substrate
with a thienyl group gave the product 2q in 70% yield
(entry 18), while other nucleophiles such as methyl- and
benzylmagnesium bromides gave the products in moderate
to good yields (entries 19 and 20).
Since R-addition proceeded regioselectively, we next
studied γ-addition to give allenyl enolates. Although we
examined various reaction conditions, e.g., use of various
electrophiles and addition of some ligands to weaken the
OÀMg bond of magnesium enolate, the R-adduct was
obtained in all cases. Finally we obtained the γ-product 3a
in 18% yield, when CH2Cl2 was used as a solvent (Table 3,
(5) For N-alkylation to R-imino esters: (a) Dickstein, J. S.; Kozlowski,
M. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1166. (b) Dickstein, J. S.; Fennie, M. W.;
Norman, A. L.; Paulose, B. J.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 15794. (c) Chiev, K. P.; Roland, S.; Mangeney, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2205. (d) Mae, M.; Amii, H.; Uneyama, K. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7893. (e) Bertrand, M. P.; Feray, L.; Nouguier, R.;
Perfetti, P. Synlett 1999, 1148. (f) Yoo, S. E.; Gong, Y. D. Heterocycles
1997, 45, 1251. (g) Uneyama, K.; Yan, F.; Hirama, S.; Katagiri, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2045. (h) Yamamoto, Y.; Ito, W. Tetrahedron
1988, 44, 5415. (i) Fiaud, J.-C.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12,
1019.
(6) (a) Sano, T.; Mizota, I.; Shimizu, M. Chem. Lett. 2013, DOI:
10.1246/cl.130396. (b) Shimizu, M.; Kurita, D.; Mizota, I. Asian J. Org.
Chem. 2013, 2, 208. (c) Shimizu, M.; Takao, Y.; Katsurayama, H.; Mizota,
I. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2, 130. (d) Nishi, T.; Mizota, I.; Shimizu, M.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 2609. (e) Mizota, I.; Tanaka, K.; Shimizu, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1847. (f) Shimizu, M.; Hachiya, I.; Mizota, I.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 874. (g) Shimizu, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78,
1867. (h) Shimizu, M.; Itou, H.; Miura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
3296. (i) Niwa, Y.; Shimizu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3720. (j)
Niwa, Y.; Takayama, K.; Shimizu, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75,
1819. (k) Niwa, Y.; Takayama, K.; Shimizu, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 5473. (l) Shimizu, M.; Niwa, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2829.
entry 1). In this context, addition of a Lewis acid, BF3 OEt2,
3
was next investigated, and the yield of γ-adduct 3a was
improved to 44% (entry 2). Although use of ZnCl2 or AlCl3
was not effective (entries 4 and 5), it was found that MgBr2
was an appropriate Lewis acid to promote γ-addition, and
the combined use of THF and MgBr2 gave the best result
(entry 8). Use of MgCl2 worked equally well (entry 9).
The scope of the reaction was next examined, and
the results are summarized in Table 4. Under the optimum
reaction conditions (Conditions A, see the equation),
aromatic and heteroaromatic acyl chlorides afforded
the desired products 3a, 3b, 3f, 3k in good to high yields
(entries 1, 3, 9, and 15). However, when aliphatic acyl
chlorides were used, the γ-products 3c, 3d were not ob-
tained at all (entries 4 and 6). As compared with the results
obtained under the conditions A, the yields of 3a, 3f, and
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 16, 2013
4207