Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 1311–1318.
tion in the lifetime measurements. Depending on the experi- C20H12ClNO4: C, 65.67; H, 3.31; N, 3.83; found: C, 65.30; H,
ment, a small part of the 700 or 800 nm laser beam was picked 3.24; N, 3.79.
and sent to a photodiode (TDA 200, Picoquant). The laser and
fluorescence signals were subsequently sent to a correlator 4-(6-Chloro-1,3-dioxo-1H-benzo[de]isoquinolin-2(3H)-
(PicoHarp 300, Picoquant). The time of arrival of the fluores- yl)benzoic acid (2): Derivative 1 (1.0 mmol, 0.36 g) was
cence photons was measured with 4 ps or 16 ps resolution suspended in water (5 mL) and a solution of sodium hydroxide
depending on the experiment, and the fluorescence temporal (1.3 mmol, 0.05 g) in water (5 mL) was added at room tempera-
decay was reconstructed. The impulsive response function ture. The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 18 h. The homoge-
(IRF) was taken as the decay curve at the excitation wave- neous reaction mixture was acidified with 1 M HCl solution
length (400 nm). The IRF curve was free from the fluorescence until approximately pH 2. The product was filtered, crystallized
signal. From the IRF curves, we estimated the temporal from MeOH and dried. Yield: 63%, 0.22 g; beige powder,
response of the setup as 150 ps FWHM. The data were numeri- mp > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.78 (dd, J1 = 8.49,
cally deconvoluted using the measured IRF and fitted to mono- J2 = 7.54 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.74 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (d,
or bi-exponential decays, using a commercial program (IgorPro, J = 7.82 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (dd, J1 = 7.15, J2 = 1.30 Hz, 2H), 8.43
Wavemetrics).
(ddd, J1 = 8.49, J2 = 1.22, J3 = 0.63 Hz, 2H), 13.04 (br s,
COOH); Anal. calcd for C19H10ClNO4: C, 64.88; H, 2.87; N,
The two-photon absorption cross section was determined by 3.98; found: C, 64.54; H, 2.80; N, 3.86.
using fluorescence excitation spectroscopy. The same tunable
femtosecond laser source (operating at 80 MHz), was used to 4-(6-Hydroxy-1,3-dioxo-1H-benzo[de]isoquinolin-2(3H)-
excite a solution of 4 by two-photon absorption. The laser beam yl)benzoic acid (3): Derivative 1 (1.0 mmol, 0.36 g) was
was spatially extended with a telescope and was focused into suspended in water (5 mL) and a solution of sodium hydroxide
the 1 cm cell containing a solution of 4 in toluene with a NA 0.4 (4.0 mmol, 0.16 g) in water (5 mL) was added at room tempera-
objective lens. The generated fluorescence was collected at 90° ture. The mixture was heated under reflux for 24 h. The homo-
and filtered through a short-pass interference filter. After geneous reaction mixture was acidified with 1 M HCl/H2O
passing through a monochromator (Spectra Pro 500i, Acton) it solution until approximately pH 2. The product was filtered,
was detected by a CCD camera (Roper Scientific). The fluores- crystallized from EtOH and dried. Yield: 48%, 0.20 g; pale
cence spectra were recorded for the excitation wavelengths yellow powder, mp > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 7.54 (d,
between 700 to 950 nm, in 5 nm steps. Integration time ranged J = 8.69 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (dd, J1 = 8.45, J2 = 7.35 Hz, 1H), 8.08
from 10 ms to 2 s depending on the fluorescence signal level. (d, J = 8.69 Hz, 2H), 8.10 (d, J = 7.90 Hz, 1H), 8.47 (d,
The average laser power was typically kept around 500 mW. J = 7.90 Hz, 1H), 8.61 (dd, J1 = 7.27, J2 = 1.07 Hz, 1H), 8.68
The two-photon absorption spectra were calculated by inte- (dd, J1 = 8.49, J2 = 1.07 Hz, 1H), 11.02 (s, OH); 13.04 (br s,
grating the fluorescence spectra for each excitation wavelength. COOH); Anal. calcd for C19H11NO5: C, 68.47; H, 3.33; N,
The spectra were normalized by the integration time and the 4.20; found: C, 68.31; H, 3.32; N, 4.18.
square of the average laser power. The two-photon absorption
cross section of 4 was determined by comparing the two-photon 4-(1,3-Dioxo-6-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-benzo[de]isoquinolin-
absorption spectrum with that of rhodamine B (RhB) in 2(3H)-yl)benzoic acid (4): Method A. Derivative 2 (1.0 mmol,
methanol, and by normalizing by its quantum yield. The values 0.35 g) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL), and piperidine
for RhB found in the literature have been determined with the (2 mmol, 0.2 mL) was added at room temperature. The mixture
same typical pulse duration of about 150 fs [19].
was heated under reflux for 8 h. The basic reaction mixture was
neutralized with 1 M HCl solution until approximately pH 6–7.
Methyl 4-(6-chloro-1,3-dioxo-1H-benzo[de]isoquinolin- The product was filtered, crystallized from MeOH and dried.
2(3H)-yl)benzoate (1): To a solution of 4-chloro-1,8-naphthalic Yield: 10%, 0.04 g. Method B. Derivative 6 (1.0 mmol, 0.36 g)
anhydride (2 mmol, 0.46 g) in 1,4-dioxane (10 mL), methyl was suspended in water (5 mL) and a solution of sodium
4-aminobenzoate (6 mmol, 0.90 g) was added at room tempera- hydroxide (1.3 mmol, 0.05 g) in water (5 mL) was added at
ture. The mixture was heated under reflux for 24 h. The prod- room temperature. The mixture was heated at 80 °C for 18 h.
uct was filtered, purified by crystallization from EtOH, and The homogeneous reaction mixture was acidified with 1 M HCl
dried. Yield: 77%, 0.56 g; pale yellow crystals, mp > 300 °C; solution until approximately pH 2. The product was filtered,
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.94 (s, 3H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.86 crystallized from MeOH and dried. Yield: 69%, 0.17 g; orange
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (dd, J1 = 8.5, J2 = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (d, crystals, mp > 300 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 1.60–1.80 (m,
J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.53 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.67 (d, 6H), 2.9–3.0 (m 4H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.7 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H); Anal. calcd for J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (dd, J1 = 8.4, J2 = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d,
1317