Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
Scheme 1. Hydroalkylation of Homoallylic Alcohols and β,β-
Difluorinated Homoallylic Alcohols
entry
catalyst
x
gasb
solvent
yield of 3a (%)c
1
Pd(IiPr)(OTs)2
Pd(MeCN)2Cl2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
4
4
4
0
4
4
6
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Ar
Ar
Ar
O2
O2
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
air
DMA
8
2
DMA
5
3
DMA
23
0e
4d
5
DMA
DMA
37
39
50
48
31
51
52
60
29
75
63
78
0e
6
DMA
7
DMA
8
DMA
9
DMF
10
11
12
13
14f
15g
16f,h
17f
DCM
gem-difluoromethylene group (CF2).9 The incorporation of a
CF2 group into organic molecules has a profound influ-
ence on their chemical and physical properties.10 There-
fore, the transposition of CH2 to CF2 at the allylic position
of the homoallylic alcohol can modify the electronic and
steric environment of the alkene of interest. Recently, the
efforts of our group have focused on the development
of the carbonꢀcarbon bond formation by using gem-
difluorinated compounds as coupling partners.11 Herein,
we report the palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reac-
tions of β,β-difluorinated homoallylic alcohols with
alkylzinc reagents to afford the anti-Markovnikov gem-
difluoromethylene-containing hydroalkylated products in
high yields (Scheme 1c).
THF
dioxane
xylene
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
a Reactions were carried out on a 0.2 mmol scale. Unless stated
otherwise, nBuZnBr was added dropwise to the reaction mixture within
10 min. BQ = benzoquinone. b Gas balloon was used. c Yield relative to
benzotrifluoride as an internal standard was determined by 19F NMR.
d Without BQ. e 1a was recovered completely. f nBuZnBr was added
dropwise to the reaction mixture over 45 min. g nBuZnBr was added
dropwise to the reaction mixture over 60 min. h 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 was
used.
We initiated our studies by testing the reactions of
(2-(benzyloxy)-3,3-difluoropent-4-enyl)benzene 1a and
nBuZnBr 2a catalyzed by palladium complexes (Table 1).
Sigman and co-workers6ꢀ8 reported that Pd(IiPr)(OTs)2
and Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 showed excellent activities for the
anti-Markovnikov hydroalkylation of organozinc re-
agents with alkenes. Unfortunately, when we attempted
the coupling reactions of 1a and 2a using Pd(IiPr)(OTs)2
and Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 as catalysts and benzoquinnone (BQ)
as oxidant, only a small amount of hydroalkylation
product 3a was detected (entries 1, 2). When Pd(OAc)2
was employed as catalyst, a 23% yield of 3a was obtained
(entry 3). It has been reported that O2 can be used as a
terminal oxidant.12 Therefore, the reaction of 1a and 2a
was carried out under aerobic oxidation conditions.
However, no desired product was observed, and the
starting material 1a was recovered completely (entry 4).
Surprisingly, when benzoquinone (BQ) was used as oxi-
dant with O2 as co-oxidant, a 37% yield of the hydroalk-
ylation product was formed (entry 5). It indicated that
BQ is essential to this reaction. Recently, Lei and co-
workers13 described that dry air can also be used as the
terminal oxidant for the Pd-catalyzed aerobic oxidative
cross-coupling between terminal alkynes and alkylzinc
reagents. Accordingly, when 1a and 2a were treated with
BQ under a dry air atmosphere, the yield of 3a was slightly
improved to 39% (entry 6). In consideration of the fact
that nBuZnBr 2a served not only as a coupling partner but
also as a hydride source, the increasing amount of
nBuZnBr 2a would result in better performance of the
coupling reaction. As expected, the desired product 3a
was formed in 50% yield in the presence of 6 equiv of
nBuZnBr 2a (entry 7). However, when the amount of
nBuZnBr 2a was further increased, there was no improve-
ment of this reaction (entry 8). The exploration of sol-
vents then demonstrated that dioxane was the most
efficient solvent (entries 9ꢀ13). To our delight, when
nBuZnBr 2a was added dropwise to the reaction mixture
over 45 min, the yield of 3a was further improved to 75%
yield (entry 14). Nevertheless, the addition of nBuZnBr 2a
to the reaction mixture over 60 min led to the lower yield
of 3a (entry 15). Interestingly, the reaction of 1a and 2a
(9) (a) O’Hagan, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308. (b) Schlosser, M.;
Michel, D. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 99. (c) Bondi, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1966,
70, 3006. (d) Bondi, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441.
(10) (a) O’Hagan, D.; Wang, Y.; Skibinski, M.; Slawin, A. M. Z. Pure
Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 1587. (b) Qing, F.-L.; Zheng, F. Synlett 2011,
1052. (c) Tozer, M. J.; Herpin, T. F. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8619.
(11) (a) Lin, X.; Zheng, F.; Qing, F.-L. Organometallics 2012, 31,
1578. (b) Lin, X.; Zheng, F.; Qing, F.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 8696.
(12) Selected papers: (a) Podhajsky, S. M.; Iwai, Y.; Cook-Sneathen,
A.; Sigman, M. S. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 4435. (b) Liao, L.; Sigman,
M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10209. (c) Gligorich, K. M.; Iwai, Y.;
Cummings, S. A.; Sigman, M. S. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 5074. (d)
Gligorich, K. M.; Cummings, S. A.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 14193.
(13) Chen, M.; Zheng, X.; Li, W.; He, J.; Lei, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 4101.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 17, 2013
4479