Job/Unit: O30148
/KAP1
Date: 06-03-13 15:54:29
Pages: 6
R. Fürst, C. Lentsch, U. Rinner
SHORT COMMUNICATION
In our third approach, protection of d-ribonolactone
(23) as its acetonide was followed by exposure of the lac-
tone to pyrrolidine at elevated temperature to obtain amide
29 in excellent yield (Scheme 7). Next, silylation of both
hydroxy functionalities was followed by addition of meth-
yllithium to deliver the corresponding methyl ketone, which
could be smoothly converted into alkene 31 upon reaction
with Tebbe’s reagent. Removal of both silyl ethers and sub-
Experimental Section
Preparation of 33: To a solution of SmI2 (0.1 m in THF, 100 mL,
10 mmol, 2.5 equiv.) in a 250 mL round bottom Schlenk flask was
added a solution of bromide 7 (1.44 g, 4.41 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) and
aldehyde 32 (683 mg, 4.01 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in degassed THF
(60 mL, 3 pump–freeze–thaw cycles) at –78 °C by cannula. The re-
action mixture was stirred for 1 h at –78 °C before it was quenched
by the addition of aqueous saturated solutions of sodium thio-
sequent oxidative cleavage of the vicinal diol with NaIO4 sulfate (50 mL) and sodium hydrogen carbonate (50 mL) at –78 °C,
and the biphasic system was warmed to room temperature. The
two phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3ϫ). The combined organic extract was dried
with sodium sulfate and filtered, and the organic solvents were re-
moved under reduced pressure to deliver alcohol 33 as a light-
yellow oil, which was further purified by flash column chromatog-
raphy (hexanes/ethyl acetate, 9:1) to provide 33 (1.14 g, 68%).
delivered aldehyde 32, the precursor for the crucial dia-
stereoselective Reformatsky reaction. Again, as discussed
for the first approach, the desired secondary alcohol was
obtained in good yield as a single isomer when a degassed,
precooled THF solution of bromide 7 and aldehyde 32 was
added to a SmI2 solution at –78 °C. Final MOM protection
delivered advanced intermediate 34 and completed the
preparation of the eastern part of Pl-3 (1).
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental details and copies of the 1H NMR and 13C
NMR spectra of all compounds described in this communication.
Acknowledgments
R. F. is a recipient of a DOC-fFORTE fellowship of the Austrian
Academy of Sciences at the Institute of Organic Chemistry, Univer-
sity of Vienna. The Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen
Forschung (FWF) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support
of this work (project number FWF-P20697-N19).
[1] J. G. Graham, M. L. Quinn, D. S. Fabricant, N. R. Farnsworth,
J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 347–377.
[2] Q. W. Shi, X. H. Su, H. Kiyota, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 4295–
4327.
[3] a) J. Hohmann, F. Evanics, G. Dombi, P. Szabo, Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 211–215; b) C. Valente, M. J. U. Ferreira, P. M. Ab-
reu, N. Gyemant, K. Ugocsai, J. Hohmann, J. Molnar, Planta
Med. 2004, 70, 81–84; c) G. Corea, E. Fattorusso, V. Lanzotti,
O. Taglialatela-Scafati, G. Appendino, M. Ballero, P. N. Simon,
C. Dumontet, A. Di Pietro, J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3395–
3402; d) G. Corea, A. Di Pietro, C. Dumontet, E. Fattorusso,
V. Lanzotti, Phytochem. Rev. 2009, 8, 431–447; e) I. Valente,
M. Reis, N. Duarte, J. Serly, J. Molnar, M. J. U. Ferreira, J.
Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1915–1921.
Scheme 7. Preparation of alkene 34 (TBAF = tetrabutylammonium
fluoride).
[4] a) S. M. Kupchan, C. W. Sigel, M. J. Matz, J. A. S. Renauld,
R. C. Haltiwanger, R. F. Bryan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
4476–4477; b) S. M. Kupchan, C. W. Sigel, M. J. Matz, C. J.
Gilmore, R. F. Bryan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2295–2300.
[5] a) A. B. Smith, A. T. Lupo, M. Ohba, K. Chen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 6648–6656; b) A. C. Gyorkos, J. K. Stille, L. S.
Hegedus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8465–8472; c) Q. Han,
D. F. Wiemer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7692–7697; d) T.
Matsuura, S. Nishiyama, S. Yamamura, Chem. Lett. 1993,
1503–1504; e) J. Mulzer, G. Giester, M. Gilbert, Helv. Chim.
Acta 2005, 88, 1560–1579; f) H. Helmboldt, D. Kohler, M. Hi-
ersemann, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1573–1576; g) K. Shimokawa, H.
Takamura, D. Uemura, Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5623–5625;
h) C. Lentsch, U. Rinner, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5326–5328; i) H.
Helmboldt, M. Hiersemann, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1698–
1708; j) C. Schnabel, M. Hiersemann, Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
2555–2558; k) C. Schnabel, K. Sterz, H. Müller, J. Rehbein, M.
Wiese, M. Hiersemann, J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 512–522; l) P.
Mohan, K. Koushik, M. J. Fuertes, Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53,
2730–2732.
Conclusions
We have established a general nine-step sequence for the
synthesis of the eastern fragment of Pl-3. The Reformatsky
reaction, described in detail within this manuscript, can be
employed in the synthesis of jatrophane diterpenes to estab-
lish recurring structural motifs within the eastern part. The
application of different carbohydrate derivatives as the
starting material in combination with the highly diastereo-
selective SmI2-mediated Reformatsky reaction grants access
to a variety of structurally related Euphorbiaceae di-
terpenes. Owing to the diastereoselective control of the chi-
ral auxiliary within the SmI2-mediated Reformatsky reac-
tion, the utilization of this reaction will be of interest for
other synthetic applications. The scope of the synthetic
route and the completion of the preparation of Pl-3 are cur-
rently under investigation in our group.
[6] J. Hohmann, P. Forgo, D. Csupor, G. Schlosser, Helv. Chim.
Acta 2003, 86, 3386–3393.
4
www.eurjoc.org
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0