2126
H. Wang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 2124–2127
Table 4
Synthesis of NHC precursorsa
R2
N
NHR2
NHR2
HC(OMe)3
Cl
N
R2
HCl , HCOOH
R1
R1
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Cl
Cl
N
Cl
N
N
N
N
N
Cl
Cl
N
Compound6', 92%
Compound5', 94%
Compound1', 90%
F
Compound2', 93%
Compound3', 90%
N
N
Cl
Cl
N
N
N
Cl
N
Compound8', 97%
Compound11', 88%
Compound9', 93%
a
The reaction conditions: N,N0-diarylaryldiamine was distilled in trimethyl orthoformate. Then concd HCl and formic acid were added to the solution. The mixture was
heated to 80 °C. After 2 h, the mixture was cooled to room temp and concentrated. The product was purified by silica flash column chromatography.
on the above optimized conditions, we extended the one-pot syn-
thetic procedure to other aryldiamines and arylbromides. The re-
sults are summarized in Table 3.
ferent bases used in the reaction, one can also tune the reaction
to be useful for wider ranges of functional groups in the starting
materials. In most cases, further reactions with trimethyl ortho-
formate afforded the corresponding NHC precursors in good to
high yields.
As shown in Table 3, a series of N,N0-diarylaryldiamines were
successfully prepared in high yields. When sodium t-butoxide
was used as the base (entries 1, 2, 5, 6, 8–12), high yields were ob-
tained in relatively short reaction time. On the other hand, when
aryl halides were not compatible with sodium t-butoxide (entries
3, 4, and 7), Cs2CO3 served as a fairly good alternative offering
yields in 71–84% range in 24 h of reaction time. One limitation
for our protocol is that strongly electron deficient aryldiamines
such as 4-nitro-1,2-diaminobenzene or 2,3-diaminopyridine could
not afford the corresponding desired products. In addition, due to
the relatively high reaction temperature, small amounts of Ull-
mann homocoupling products were formed from aryl halides.
Additional work to address these two issues is currently underway.
With a series of N,N0-diarylaryldiamines in hand, we proceeded
to prepare the corresponding NHC precursors through cyclization
with trimethylorthoformate and HCl. The results are summarized
in Table 4. While the cyclization worked well for 8 of the 12 cases,
diamines with strong electron withdrawing substitutions did not
work (entries 4, 7, and 10), nor did the 7-member ring system (en-
try 12).
Acknowledgments
Financial support of this work was provided by Shanghai Saijia
Chemicals Ltd, Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Com-
mission (Project No.12430501300), and the Students Innovation
Program in Shanghai University of Engineering Science
(cx1204018).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382; (b) Ma, D.-W.; Zhang, Y.;
Yao, J.; Wu, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12459.
2. Ma, D. W.; Cai, Q. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2453–2455.
3. Boger, D. L.; Panek, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3175.
4. Paul, F.; Patt, J.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5969.
5. Guram, A. S.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7901.
6. Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1144–1157.
7. Kranenburg, M.; van der Burgt, Y. E. M.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwan, P. W. N.
M.; Goubitz, K.; Fraanje, J. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3081.
In summary, using the classical Pd2dba3/BINAP catalytic sys-
tem for C–N coupling, we developed a one-pot protocol for the
synthesis of N,N0-diarylaryldiamines starting from aryldiamine
and aryl bromides. The synthetic procedure has excellent selectiv-
ity for producing the desired di-secondary amine products while
minimizing the formation of tertiary amine byproducts. With dif-