Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C7CC05098D
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
cancellation of positive and negative spin density, as in C1 and unexpectedly small paramagnetic shifts for the two C closest
C2), the error is greater. Fig. 5b shows a plot of calculated 13C (through space and through bond) to the Cu2+, however, DFT
dδiso/d(1/T) (which is proportional to the hyperfine coupling calculations are essential for enabling spectral assignment. Our
constant) against the experimental values for the same computational method appears generally applicable to these
compounds. Again, generally excellent agreement is achieved, complexes and we are now seeking to extend it to
although it can be seen from the inset in Fig. 5b that, for C1, multinuclear complexes more closely resembling the extended
there is often
a disagreement between calculation and structures of MOFs, in order to develop our joint
experiment on the sign of the hyperfine coupling constant computational/experimental NMR approach into a structural
when the latter becomes small. Fig. 5c and d show similar plots tool for these more demanding materials.
for the 1H resonances, with excellent agreement between
This work was supported by the EPSRC through the
experiment and calculation for most resonances. The sign of Collaborative Computational Project on NMR Crystallography
iso/d(1/T) for H5 is consistently miscalculated, but its (CCP-NC), via EP/M022501/1. SEA would also like to thank the
magnitude is essentially negligible in both cases. For Hbr, the Royal Society and Wolfson Foundation for a merit award. MB
magnitude of d iso/d(1/T) is calculated to be essentially would like to thank EaStCHEM and the School of Chemistry for
d
δ
δ
independent of substituents, but the experimental values support and access to a computer cluster maintained by Dr. H.
show a much wider variation, most likely reflecting that the Früchtl. ZK gratefully acknowledges a scholarship from the
static picture of the hydrogen-bonded species is incomplete China Scholarship Council. For research data supporting this
Initial exploratory calculations confirmed that the chemical 88fb-4a55-a1eb-05e020f369fd.
shift of this proton may indeed be more sensitive to vibrational
averaging than those of most other nuclei (see ESI), but a full
References
appraisal of the magnitude of this effect would require a
proper dynamical treatment (preferably including quantum
dynamics), which is beyond the scope of the present paper.
As mentioned above, the gas-phase calculations do not
take into account longer-range crystal packing, whereas, in the
solid state, a wide range of three-dimensional packing motifs is
observed for these compounds.18 Indeed, two polymorphs are
known for 119 (we report data only for the isolated molecular
Cu(L1)2 complex rather than the polymeric [Cu(L1)2]n). and we
1
I. Bertini, L. Emsley, M. Lelli, C. Luchinat, J. Mao and G.
Pintacuda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5558.
2
D. M. Dawson, L. E. Jamieson, M. I. H. Mohideen, A. C.
McKinlay, I. A. Smellie, R. Cadou, N. S. Keddie, R. E. Morris
and S. E. Ashbrook, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 919.
F. Gul-E-Noor, B. Jee, A. Pöppl, M. Hartmann, D. Himsl and
M. Bertmer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7783.
G. de Combarieu, M. Morcrette, F. Millange, N. Guillou, J.
Cabana, C. P. Grey, I. Margiolaki, G. Férey and J.-M. Tarascon,
Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 1602.
3
4
have also observed polymorphism in 7, which has a dramatic
5
6
D. S. Middlemiss, A. J. Ilott, R. J. Clément, F. C. Strobridge and
C. P. Grey, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25, 1723.
M. Bühl, S. E. Ashbrook, D. M. Dawson, R. A. Doyle, P.
effect on the observed NMR parameters.18 The effects of such
bulk differences in the crystal structure will be the subject of a
subsequent publication and here we report results only for the
Hrobárik, M. Kaupp and I. A. Smellie, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22
15328.
,
thermodynamically-stable form of 7. On a more local level,
7
N. P. Wickramasinghe, M. A. Shaibat, C. R. Jones, L. B.
Casabianca, A. C. de Dios, J. S. Harwood and Y. Ishii, J. Chem.
Phys., 2008, 128 052210.
crystallographic inequivalence of chemically-equivalent species
can also lead to small shift differences. Most of the complexes
studied here are centrosymmetric, leading to one resonance
8
9
I. Bertini, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 150, 1.
M. Bertmer, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2017, 81, 1.
per chemically-distinct C or H. However, for
3, multiple
10 S. S.-Y. Chui, S. M.-F. Lo, J. P. H. Charmant, A. G. Orpen, I. D.
Williams, Science, 1999, 283, 1148.
resonances are observed for some H species, suggesting either
a lowering of the symmetry for the molecule or multiple
distinct molecules per unit cell. This is, as might be expected,
most apparent for H7, which exhibits two resonances with a
shift difference of 9.4 ppm at 298 K (see ESI). Clearly, such
structural effects will, ultimately need to be considered in
order to provide a complete spectral assignment in cases
where there are multiple phases or more than one
crystallographic ligand species present. We are currently
investigating whether these effects can be modelled simply by
the interaction within a small (2-3 molecule) cluster, or
whether the full periodic crystal structure must be considered.
The combined computational and experimental strategy
presented here allows for the assignment of the 1H and 13C
NMR spectra of these paramagnetic complexes, with the
portion of the molecule closest to the Cu2+ centre experiencing
large contact shifts and the atoms further away experiencing
only much smaller pseudocontact shifts. Given the
11 C. Bonhomme, C. Gervais, F. Babonneau, C. Coelho, F.
Pourpoint, T. Azaïs, S. E. Ashbrook, J. M. Griffin, J. R. Yates, F.
Mauri and C. J. Pickard, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 5733.
12 T. Charpentier, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 2011, 40, 1.
13 S. E. Ashbrook and D. McKay, Chem. Comm., 2016, 52, 7186.
14 S. Moon, S. Patchkovskii, in: Calculation of NMR and EPR
Parameters. Theory and Applications, M. Kaupp, M. Bühl and
V. G. Malkin (Eds.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004, pp. 325-
340.
15 P. Hrobarik, R. Reviakine, A. V. Arbuznikov, O. L. Malkina, V.
G. Malkin, F. Koehler, M. Kaupp. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126,
024107.
16 G. Kervern, G. Pintacuda, Y. Zhang, E. Oldfield, C. Roukoss, E.
Kuntz, E. Herdtweck, J.-M. Basset, S. Cadars, A. Lesage, C.
Copéret and L. Emsley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 13545.
17 Y. Zhang, H. Sun and E. Oldfield, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127
3652.
18 F. M. Mack, MChem Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2017.
,
19 K. N. Lazarou, A. K. Boudalis, V. Psycharis and C. P.
Raptopoulou, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2011, 370, 50.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins