M. Kalpio et al. / Food Chemistry 172 (2015) 718–724
719
OC18:1
OC18:1
OC16:1
OC18:1
OC18:1
OC18:2
OC18:2
OC18:1
OC18:1
Laakso & Christie, 1990). The resolution of the diacylglycerol ure-
thanes is achieved by adsorption chromatography. Also chiral-
phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is widely
applied as an alternative method for resolution of the isolated diac-
ylglycerol (DAG) and monoacylglycerol (MAG) derivatives in the
stereospecific analysis of TAGs (Itabashi, 2005). One significant
drawback in the laborious multistep methods is the acyl migration
of fatty acids between the positions of glycerol (Compton,
Vermillion, & Laszlo, 2007), and it is difficult to totally eliminate.
In the end, the stereochemistry of individual TAG molecules
remains unknown in these methods.
OC16:1
H
H
H
H
H
OC10:0
OC16:0
OC16:0
OC16:0
OC20:0
OC18:1
OC18:1
OC18:1
OC16:0
OC18:2
OC16:0
OC18:1
OC18:0
H
H
H
H
OC22:0
OC16:0
OC16:0
OC18:0
Fig. 1. The synthesised triacylglycerol enantiomers.
International (Radnor, PA). All solvents were either pro analysis
or HPLC grade and used without further purification.
Iwasaki and coauthors were the first to present the enantio-
meric separation of intact TAGs containing octanoic acid and eico-
sapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid, in combinations
unlikely to be found in nature (Iwasaki et al., 2001). A recent
study by Nagai et al. (2011) introduced a direct enantiomer reso-
lution of naturally occurring TAGs without derivatisation, using
HPLC in which the sample was recycled through the column sev-
eral times. Other methods based on circulation of the analytes
through one column, have also been developed (Charton, Bailly,
& Guiochon, 1994; Grill, 1998). In four applications the enantio-
meric separation of TAGs has been achieved by using polysaccha-
Fifteen racemic (Table 1) and nine enantiopure (Fig. 1) reference
compounds were used for the HPLC analyses. All racemic TAGs
were purchased from Larodan Fine Chemicals (Malmö, Sweden).
Enantiopure structured (S)-TAGs with saturated, mono- or diunsat-
urated fatty acids at predetermined positions of the glycerol back-
bone were prepared as described by Kristinsson, Linderborg, Kallio,
and Haraldsson (2014). In short, altogether 18 compounds, includ-
ing MAG and DAG intermediates, and AAB-type enantiopure struc-
tured (S)-TAGs were synthesised. (S)-TAGs may be divided into two
categories. Six of them possess one saturated fatty acyl group
located in the sn-3 position and two identical unsaturated fatty
acyl groups in the remaining sn-1 and sn-2 positions of the glycerol
backbone. The saturated fatty acids belonging to the first category
include decanoic (C10:0), palmitic (C16:0), arachidic (C20:0) and
behenic (C22:0) acids, and the unsaturated fatty acids present
include the monounsaturated palmitoleic (C16:1) and oleic
(C18:1) acids, and the diunsaturated linoleic (C18:2) acid. The
remaining three TAGs of second category possess two identical sat-
urated acyl groups in the sn-2 and sn-3 positions and one unsatu-
rated acyl group in the sn-1 position. The saturated fatty acids of
the second category are limited to palmitic and stearic (C18:0)
acids, and the unsaturated fatty acids are C18:1 and C18:2. The
synthesis of the first category TAGs is based on a five-step chemo-
ride-based chiral stationary phases (Iwasaki et al., 2001; Lísa &
ˇ
ˇ
´
Holcapek, 2013; Nagai et al., 2011; Rezanka, Lukavsky,
ˇ
& Sigler, 2012). Lísa and Holcapek
Nedbalová, Kolouchová,
(2013) separated TAG enantiomers and regioisomers with 1–8
double bonds and different chain lengths using two columns in
the normal-phase mode. However, specific co-elution problems
existed in analysis of TAGs with saturated and polyunsaturated
fatty acids in primary positions. The retention behaviour of TAG
enantiomers in chiral HPLC is highly complex and depends on
the specific molecular structures. Thus, the use of pure enantio-
meric reference compounds is essential.
The aim of the present study was to apply a sample recycling
HPLC system based on two identical chiral columns (Trone,
Vaughn, & Cole, 2006) to separate intact TAG enantiomers natu-
rally found in many food fats and oils. The other objective was to
determine the enantiomeric elution order to investigate the reten-
tion mechanisms.
enzymatic process involving
a highly regioselective Candida
antarctica lipase, and the second category TAG products were syn-
thesised by a fully chemical five-step synthetic route where no
enzyme was needed. All intermediates and final TAG products
were obtained in high chemical and regiopurity. No acyl migration
was observed to take place during these reactions. Synthesised
products were fully characterised by traditional synthetic organic
chemistry methods including 1H and 13C NMR and IR spectroscopy,
as well as high-resolution mass spectrometric analyses. Specific
rotation was determined for all chiral compounds involved, and
the melting point was determined for all compounds that were
crystalline.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Chemicals and reference TAGs
Methanol was from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Netherlands).
n-Hexane was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Corporation
(St. Louis, MO). Acetonitrile and 2-propanol were from VWR
Table 1
Retention times (tR, min) of all triacylglycerol racemates after the first column and separation factors (
a
).
tR
TAG
Abbreviation
a
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-caproyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-lauroyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-myristoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-palmitoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-stearoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-arachidoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-behenoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dipalmitoleoyl-3-palmitoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dipalmitoleoyl-3-oleoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dilinoleoyl-3-palmitoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dioleoyl-3-linoleoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dipalmitoyl-3-linoleoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dipalmitoyl-3-elaidoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Dipalmitoyl-3-oleoyl-rac-glycerol
1,2-Distearoyl-3-oleoyl-rac-glycerol
rac-18:1-18:1-10:0
rac-18:1-18:1-12:0
rac-18:1-18:1-14:0
rac-18:1-18:1-16:0
rac-18:1-18:1-18:0
rac-18:1-18:1-20:0
rac-18:1-18:1-22:0
rac-16:1-16:1-16:0
rac-16:1-16:1-18:1
rac-18:2-18:2-16:0
rac-18:1-18:1-18:2
rac-16:0-16:0-18:2
rac-16:0-16:0-tr18:1
rac-16:0-16:0-18:1
rac-18:0-18:0-18:1
17.9
19.8
25.0
29.4
34.9
40.0
48.6
20.4
21.6
24.6
26.0
27.3
30.9
31.0
40.0
n.d.*
1.006
1.020
1.021
1.022
1.045
1.074
1.014
n.d.
1.016
n.d.
1.030
n.d.
1.027
1.035
*
n.d.: not defined.