C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
in a regiospecific manner at the pseudo-geminal position, and
conversion to the diethynyl analog was achieved according to
established procedures, Figure 2.21 Monomers 2 and 1,4-diiodo-
2,5-bis(nonyloxy)benzene, 3, were subjected to Sonogashira cross-
coupling condensation polymerization in the presence of a catalytic
amount of Pd(PPh3)4 and CuI in diisopropylamine-THF. The crude
polymer was precipitated by addition of the reaction mixture to
methanol and reprecipitated in acetone to give pg-poly(PE3) as an
orange solid (60% isolated yield). Me4PE3 was prepared as a model
for the isolated (i.e., unstacked) tier of the polymer.
of 380 ( 5 nm; emission maxima at 408 ( 6 nm, and Stokes shifts
of 31 ( 3 nm). In each of these cases, the excited state of a single
conjugated chromophoric tier is sufficiently stable that there is no
driving force for energy transfer to a phane state. In these previous
studies there is limited overlap between the conjugated tiers, and large
Stokes shifts are observed only for shorter chromophores. However,
this does not reflect the extended nature of the interactions between
segments of conjugated polymers in the solid state. The large Stokes
shift of pg-poly(PE3) suggests that interchain interactions of the
chromophoric tiers over the entire length of the conjugated chains,
and stacking in an extended multitier arrangement, provide for
stabilization of a phane state which is not available to the other
regioisomers of the polymer (e.g., pp, po), the pp stacked dimer, or
unstacked analogs.
The pseudo-geminal disubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane core con-
stitutes a versatile scaffold that provides opportunities to vary the
stacking of conjugated tiers in two dimensions, akin to the organization
of segments of conjugated polymers in the solid state (i.e., through
modification of the conjugation length of the tiers and by variation of
the number of tiers held in a stack). The exploration of the effect of
these structural parameters on the optical properties of such ladder
polymers will provide additional insights into the evolution of electronic
structure upon bringing conjugated systems into close proximity.
The 1H NMR spectrum of pg-poly(PE3) consists of a series of broad
peaks with chemical shifts consistent with the expected structure. The
breadth of these peaks arises from the rigidity of the polymer in which
rotation within each oligomeric tier is severely restricted. The molecular
weight of the polymer determined by SEC was 5 kD, with a
polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.7 (THF eluent, calibrated against
polystyrene standards22). This corresponds to an average of eight repeat
units in the polymer chain (i.e., eight tiers). The polymer is soluble in
common organic solvents (CHCl3, CH2Cl2, and toluene) and is easily
processed into thin films by drop casting or spin coating.
The UV-visible and fluorescence spectra of pg-poly(PE3) were
compared to those of the corresponding unstacked model, Me4PE3,
Figure 3. The polymer and unstacked analog have similar absorption
maxima at ca. 320 and 365 nm, but the absorption edge of the
polymeric analog is red-shifted by ca. 50 nm from that of Me4PE3
and lacks the vibronic structure of the latter. The emission spectrum
of the pg polymer shows a broad peak which is significantly red-
shifted (λmax ) 530) and stronger compared to the spectrum of the
linear unstacked model (λmax ) 402).
Acknowledgment. This research was initiated with the support
of the National Science Foundation (ECS 0437925).
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic schemes and char-
acterization data are provided. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) Handbook of Conducting Polymers, 3rd ed.; Skotheim, T. A., Elsenbaumer,
R. L., Reynolds, J. R., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2007.
(2) Bredas, J.-L.; Beljonne, D.; Coropceanu, V.; Cornil, J. Chem. ReV. 2004,
104, 4971.
(3) Tan, C. Y.; Alas, E.; Muller, J. G.; Pinto, M. R.; Kleiman, V. D.; Schanze,
K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13685.
(4) Bartholomew, G. P.; Bazan, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 30.
(5) Hong, J. W.; Gaylord, B. S.; Bazan, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
11868. Hong, J. W.; Benmansour, H.; Bazan, G. C. Chem.sEur. J. 2003,
9, 3186.
(6) Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6430. Morisaki,
Y.; Chujo, Y. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 346.
(7) Salhi, F.; Lee, B.; Metz, C.; Bottomley, L. A.; Collard, D. M. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 3195.
(8) Song, C.; Swager, T. M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3575.
(9) Knoblock, K. M.; Silvestri, C. J.; Collard, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 13680.
Figure 3. UV-visible and fluorescence spectra of pseudo-geminal cyclo-
phane polymer pg-poly(PE3) (solid line) and unstacked model Me4PE3
(dashed line). [PE3 oligomer] ) 1 × 10-5 M in CHCl3, T ) 23 °C.
(10) Morisaki, Y.; Sawamura, T.; Murakami, T.; Chujo, Y. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 3188, and reference therein.
(11) Smith, R. C. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 2067. Mangalum, A.;
Morgan, B.; Hanley, J.; Jecen, K.; McGill, C.; Robertson, G.; Smith, R.
Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5136.
(12) Kaikawa, T.; Takimiya, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4197.
(13) Review: Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2009, 82, 9–1070.
(14) Guyard, L.; Audebert, P. Electrochem. Commun. 2001, 3, 164. Guyard,
L.; An, M. N. D.; Audebert, P. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 133. Salhi, F.; Collard,
D. M. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 81.
Table 1. Absorption and Emission Spectra
Absorption λmax/nma
Emission λmax/nma
Stokes shift nma
pg-poly(PE3)
320, 359
321, 374
b
319, 386
319, 377
530
171
28
b
28
34
Me4PE3
pp-(PE3)2
402 (413)d
b
(15) Morisaki, Y.; Wada, N.; Arita, M.; Chujo, Y. Polym. Bull. 2009, 62, 305.
(16) Nakano, T.; Takewaki, K.; Yade, T.; Okamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 37–9182.
(17) Kubitschke, J.; Hopf, H.; Jones, P. G.; Dix, I.; Ernst, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 548.
(18) Bunz, U. H. F. In Handbook of Conducting Polymers, 3rd ed.; Skotheim,
T. A., Elsenbaumer, R. L., Reynolds, J. R., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New
York, 2006; pp 6/1-6/15. McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M.
Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2537.
b
pp-poly(PE3)c
po-poly(PE3)c
414 (438)d
411 (434)d
a [Analyte] ) 10-5 M in CHCl3. b Spectra shown in ref 4; λmax not
provided. c Reference 15. d Vibronic peaks.
(19) Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 587.
(20) Psiorz, M.; Schmid, R. Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 1825.
(21) Bondarenko, L.; Hentschel, S.; Greiving, H.; Grunenberg, J.; Hopf, H.;
Dix, I.; Jones, P. G.; Ernst, L. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 3950.
(22) While useful for purposes of comparing materials, SEC is not a reliable
method to characterize rigid polymers: Bunz, U. H. F. In Conjugated
Polymers: Theory, Synthesis, Properties, and Characterization; Skotheim,
T. A., Reynolds, J., Eds.; CRC Press: 2006; pp 6-24.
While the large Stokes shift of the pg polymer (171 nm) relative to
that of the linear unstacked oligomer (28 nm) can be explained by
energy transfer to a phane electronic state, this behavior is in sharp
contrast to that of all of the other PE3-containing analogs. The pp
stacked dimer pp-(PE3)2,4 pp polymer,15 and po polymer15 all display
absorption and emission spectra which are similar to that of the linear
unstacked model Me4PE3, Table 1 (i.e., absorption λmax in the range
JA104696E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 35, 2010 12209