18
S. Lochbrunner et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 700 (2004) 13–18
of the electronic configurations and to account for electron
correlation effects [27]. However, such calculations were
recently performed for HBT and find in nice agreement with
our experimental results that a contraction of the donor–
acceptor distance is needed to transfer the proton and that
this contraction seems to result from skeletal motions [24].
The propagation of the wavepacket along the reaction
path is first of all associated with skeletal motions of the
molecule (see above). The proton is initially shifted together
with the oxygen atom and after the configuration change
together with the acceptor atom. It stays all the time in or
nearby the minimum of its local potential well that is moved
by the skeletal motions. Several findings support this point
of view. If the ESIPT would mainly be the direct motion of
the proton from the donor site to the acceptor site it should
be much faster because of the small proton mass [12] or it
must be hindered by a barrier. Tunneling through the barrier
as well as thermally activated crossing over the barrier
should not lead to a ballistic wavepacket motion of the
whole system as observed. Furthermore, if the proton
would not stay at its local minimum an excitation of its local
vibrational mode should occur. However, the excitation of
such high frequency modes seems to be highly
unlikely according to IR experiments [18,25] and energy
considerations [8].
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Alexander J. Wurzer, Tanja Bizjak,
Regina de Vivie-Riedle, and Vincent De Waele for valuable
contributions and discussions and gratefully acknowledge
funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
References
[1] T. Bountis (Eds.), Proton Transfer in Hydrogen-Bonded Systems,
Plenum Press, New York, 1992.
[2] P.F. Barbara, H.P. Trommsdorff (Eds.), Special Issue on Spectroscopy
and Dynamics of Elementary Proton Transfer in Polyatomic Systems,
Chem. Phys. 136 (1989) 153–360.
[3] A. Douhal, F. Lahmani, A. Zehnacker-Rentien, Chem. Phys. 178
(1993) 493.
[4] H.-H. Limbach, J. Manz (Eds.), Special Issue on Hydrogen Transfer:
Experiment and Theory, Ber. Bunsges. Phys. Chem. 102
(1998) 289–592.
[5] A.H. Zewail, J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 5660.
[6] A. Weller, Z. Elektrochem. 60 (1956) 1144.
[7] F. Laermer, T. Elsaesser, W. Kaiser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 148 (1988)
119.
[8] S. Lochbrunner, A.J. Wurzer, E. Riedle, J. Phys. Chem. A 107
(2003) 10580.
[9] T. Arthen-Engeland, T. Bultmann, N.P. Ernsting, M.A. Rodriguez, W.
Thiel, Chem. Phys. 163 (1992) 43.
[10] K. Stock, T. Bizjak, S. Lochbrunner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 354
(2002) 409.
[11] P.F. Barbara, L.E. Brus, P.M. Rentzepis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102
(1980) 5631.
4. Conclusions
[12] J.L. Herek, S. Pedersen, L. Ban˜ares, A.H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 97
(1992) 9046.
[13] C. Chudoba, E. Riedle, M. Pfeiffer, T. Elsaesser, Chem. Phys. Lett.
263 (1996) 622.
Transient absorption measurements with 30 fs time
resolution are able to reveal the nuclear motions during an
ultrafast reactive process via the ringing of the molecule in
coordinates that contribute to the reaction path. These
periodic nuclear motions persist long after the actual process
itself is finished within less than 100 fs. The ESIPT
processes of HBT, HBO and OHBA are investigated in
real time and strong similarities in the dynamics are
observed. By comparing the results, we find a common
mechanism. After optical excitation with an ultrashort
pulse, the created wavepacket propagates in a ballistic
fashion along the adiabatic PES of the S1 state.
The wavepacket propagation is associated with a bending
motion of the molecular skeleton that reduces the proton
donor–acceptor distance. An electronic configuration
change occurs at a sufficient contraction and leads to the
bonds of the product conformer. The shape of the PES is
determined by the coupling between the electronic enol and
keto configuration and the generation of the new bonds can
be described as the mixing of both configurations during the
wave packet propagation. The proton itself stays at its
local potential minimum that is shifted with the motions of
the molecular skeleton.
[14] A.J. Wurzer, S. Lochbrunner, E. Riedle, Appl. Phys. B 71 (2000) 405.
[15] S. Lochbrunner, A.J. Wurzer, E. Riedle, J. Chem. Phys. 112
(2000) 10699.
¨
[16] E. Riedle, M. Beutter, S. Lochbrunner, J. Piel, S. Schenkl, S. Sporlein,
W. Zinth, Appl. Phys. B 71 (2000) 457.
[17] S. Lochbrunner, E. Riedle, Recent Res. Dev. Chem. Phys. 4 (2003) 31.
[18] M. Rini, J. Dreyer, E.T.J. Nibbering, T. Elsaesser, Chem. Phys. Lett.
374 (2003) 13.
[19] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, F. Laloe, Quantum Mechanics, vol. 1,
Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1977, p. 242.
[20] O.K. Abou-Zied, R. Jimenez, E.H.Z. Thompson, D.P. Millar, F.E.
Romesberg, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 3665.
[21] H. Wang, H. Zhang, O.K. Abou-Zied, C. Yu, F.E. Romesberg, M.
Glasbeek, Chem. Phys. Lett. 367 (2003) 599.
´
[22] M. Ziołek, J. Kubicki, A. Maciejewski, R. Naskrecki, A. Grabowska,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 369 (2003) 80.
[23] C. Su, J.-Y. Lin, R.-M.R. Hsieh, P.-Y. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. A 106
(2002) 11997.
[24] R. de Vivie-Riedle, V. De Waele, L. Kurtz, E. Riedle, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 107 (2003) 10591.
[25] M. Rini, A. Kummrow, J. Dreyer, E.T.J. Nibbering, T. Elsaesser,
Faraday Discuss. 122 (2002) 27.
[26] M. Klessinger, J. Michl, Excited States and Photochemistry of
Organic Molecules, VCH Publishers, New York, 1995, p. 182.
[27] A.L. Sobolewski, W. Domcke, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1
(1999) 3065.