J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 57, Nº 4 (2012)
and potassium permanganate. The literature survey reveals that Eszopiclone
undergoes oxidation at methylated N of piperizine ring, 4- N(CH3), to its N
oxide viz., 4- N(CH3)®O [10].
8. P. Job, Anal. Chim., 9, 113 (1928).
9. N. Rehman, M. Kashif, Japan Soc. Anal. Chem, 19, 907 (2003).
10. Yu Sha, Lei Zhang, Gui-Jie Du, Jian Ren, Mao-Sheng Cheng, Molecules,
13, 1817, (2008).
Formation constants
The formation constant was also estimated from Job’s plot by following
method described by Likussa and Boltz [11], and Momoki etal [12].The
method involves drawing the tangents at the origin of Job’s plot from both side
and the absorbance at intersection point is taken for 100% complexation. The
absorbance at peak height of Job’s plot is taken for (100-x)% where x is the %
degree of dissociation of the complex. The instability constant, K’ = Cx2/(100-
x) is calculated, where C is concentration of drug used for Job’s method. The
reciprocal of K’ is the required stability constant K.
11. W. Likussar D.F. Boltz, Anal. Chem., 43, 1265, (1971).
12. K. Momoki, J. Sekino, H. Sato, N. Yamaguchi, Anal. Chem., 41, 1286,
(1969).
13. H A Benesi and J R Hildebrand, J Am Chem Soc, 71, 2703 (1949)
14. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical
Requirement for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human use,
Validation of analytical procedures: definitions and Terminology Genera
(1996).
Formation constant for method E
Formation constant (K) has been evaluated by using Benesi-Hikdebrand
equation[13]
[A0]/d =1/K[D0]e +1/e
where d is absorbance, e is the molar absorbtivity, A0 and D0 are initial
concentrations of acceptor [I2] and donor[drug] respectively. A plot of [A0]/d
Vs 1/[D0] yields a straight line whose slope and intercept gives the value of K.
Optimization of the factors effecting the absorbance.
The factors effecting the absorbance of ion pair complexes like pH and
volume of the dye, in methods A,B,C and D, have been optimized. 1.8 ml of
BTB and buffer of pH 2.8, 1.6 ml of BPB and buffer of pH 2.5, 1.8 ml of
BCG and buffer of pH 3.5 and 1.7 ml of BCP and buffer of pH 2.5 are found to
ne optimal for methods A.B,C and D respectively. However 5 ml of each dye
is used, at optimal pH, in the study to ensure complete extraction of the drug.
Similarly the 1 ml of iodine for method E and 1 ml of KMnO 1 ml of 0.45
NaOH are found to be optimal and hence are used in the study.4 ,
Validation of the proposed methods
The proposed method have been validated in terms of guideline proposed
by ICH [14] viz., selectivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, limits of
calibration curve, LOD, LOQ, robustness, ruggedness and regression equation.
The student t-test and variance F-test have been performed in comparison with
a reference method. Table 1A summarizes the values for Beer’s law limits,
molar absorptivity, regression equation, correlation coefficients, relative
standard deviation and recoveries. To test the reproducibility of the proposed
methods, six replicate determinations of 12.5µg ml-1 of EZP were made. The
coefficient of variation was found to be less than 1.2% for all the procedures.
The proposed methods have been successfully applied to the determination
of EZP in pharmaceutical preparations. The result obtained and shown in Table
1C were compared to those obtained by a reference method [7] by means of
t-test at 95% confidence level. In all cases, the average results obtained by
proposed methods and reference method were statistically identical, as the
difference between the average values had no significance at 95% confidence
level.
The proposed methods are simple, sensitive and reproducible and can be
used for routine analysis of EZP in pure form and in formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Head of the Department Chemistry and to
the Principal, Nizam College for providing facilities. MC is thankful to UGC
for FDP fellowship. TV is thankful to Sri M. Ravindra Reddy, Chairman,
Managing Committee SAP College, Vikarabad for providing facilities and to
the UGC for financial assistance under Major Research Project.
REFERENCES
1. C.S. Mc. Crae, A. Ross, A. Stripling, N.D. Dautovich, Clin Interv Aging,
2, 313, (2007).
2. G.S.Jufe, Vertex, 16, 294, (2007).
3. K. Anandakumar, G. Kumaraswamy, T. Ayyappan, A.S.K. Sankar, D.
Nagavalli, Res. J. Pharm.Tech, 3, 202, (2010).
4. M. Meng, L. Rohde, V. Capka, P. Bennett, Chiral Chromatographic
Method, 1, (2007).
5. K. Anandakumar, G. Kumaraswamy, T. Ayyappan, A.S.K. Sankar, D.
Nagavalli, Asian J.Res.Chem, 3, 63, (2010).
6. R.N. Kumar, G.N. Rao, P.Y. Naidu, Asian J.Res.Chem, 3, 374, (2010).
7. R. Sunil, Dhaneshwar, K. Vidhya, Bhusari, Int. J. ChemTech. Res, 3. 680,
(2011).
1463