ChemComm
Communication
and 3.27 Å. An additional lone pair–p interaction is observed ions observed in the crystal packing (a direction) of both
between the pentafluorophenyl ring and the ligand oxygen complexes are strongly interacting with each other in 1 in the
atom from an adjacent complex (Fig. S6, ESI†). The consequent b direction (particularly via strong Clꢀ ꢀ ꢀF halogen bonds),
Oꢀ ꢀ ꢀF and Oꢀ ꢀ ꢀC contact distances of respectively 2.922(4) Å and in contrast to 2. Current investigation is aimed at designing
3.085(6) Å (for LS 1), describing this supramolecular bond, a new ligand that would favour the interaction of the Fe(II)
again are clearly below the corresponding sums of vdW radii chains (along a) both in the b and c directions, which would
(namely 2.99 and 3.22 Å), thus characterizing a strong interaction. further improve the strength and multidirectionality of the
Lastly, the pentafluorophenyl group is involved in a very strong supramolecular interactions.
´
halogen bond (Fig. S7, ESI†), as evidenced by the short FꢀꢀꢀCl
Support by the Ministerio de Economıa y Competitividad of
distances of 2.969(4) Å (LS 1) and 3.013(4) Å (HS 1), which are Spain (Projects CTQ2011-27929-C02-01 and MAT2011-24284) is
notably below the sum of vdW of F and Cl (i.e. 3.22 Å). This network thanked. ALS is supported by the Director, Office of Science,
of noncovalent bonds generated by the pentafluorophenyl ring Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U. S. Department of Energy
produces a compact and rigid molecular packing, which creates under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
efficient paths for the propagation of the local distortion due to the
SCO process at the iron(II) ions, resulting in a strongly cooperative
spin crossover (abrupt transition with hysteresis loop).
Notes and references
1 O. Kahn and C. J. Martinez, Science, 1998, 279, 44–48.
The origin of the different cooperative behaviours observed
2 M. Matsuda, H. Isozaki and H. Tajima, Thin Solid Films, 2008, 517,
for 1 and 2,18 despite the similar crystal packings and supra-
molecular interactions, can be clarified via examination of the
distinct Feꢀ ꢀ ꢀFe separation distances in the lattice, their varia-
tion upon spin transition and the dimensionality of the strong
noncovalent interactions (Fig. S8 and S9, Tables S4 and S5,
ESI†). For 1, the distinct Feꢀ ꢀ ꢀFe separation distances found
along the three crystallographic axes equal to 9.084 (a axis),
10.766 (b axis) and 12.658 Å (c axis) for the LS state, and the
highest variation (i.e. distance increase by 3.7%) upon LS - HS
transition is observed in the b direction (Table S4, ESI†). For 2, the
corresponding values are 8.350, 11.358 and 15.689 Å (LS 2), with the
greatest variation (i.e. 3.5%) in the a direction (Table S5, ESI†), for
1465–1467.
3 R. N. Muller, L. van der Elst and S. Laurent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 8405–8407.
4 O. Roubeau, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 15230–15244.
´
´
5 J. R. Galan-Mascaros, E. Coronado, A. Forment-Aliaga, M. Monrabal-
Capilla, E. Pinilla-Cienfuegos and M. Ceolin, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49,
5706–5714.
6 M. A. Halcrow, Spin-Crossover Materials: Properties and Applications,
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2013.
7 M. A. Halcrow, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 4119–4142.
8 M. Quesada, M. Monrabal, G. Aromı, V. A. de la Pena-O’Shea,
M. Gich, E. Molins, O. Roubeau, S. J. Teat, E. J. MacLean,
P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 2669–2676.
9 M. Quesada, P. de Hoog, P. Gamez, O. Roubeau, G. Aromı,
B. Donnadieu, C. Massera, M. Lutz, A. L. Spek and J. Reedijk, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 1353–1361.
´
˜
´
˜
´
which the FeꢀꢀꢀFe separation distance is the shortest. Accordingly, a 10 M. Quesada, V. A. de la Pena-O’Shea, G. Aromı, S. Geremia, C. Massera,
O. Roubeau, P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 1397–1402.
11 S. M. Neville, B. A. Leita, D. A. Offermann, M. B. Duriska, B. Moubaraki,
good cooperativity is likely effective within the iron(II) supramole-
cular chain formed along the crystallographic a axis in 2,18 but the
K. W. Chapman, G. J. Halder and K. S. Murray, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2007,
communication between these chains is comparatively poorer,
which can justify the limited cooperativity exhibited by 2. Indeed,
the importance of interchain interactions for the occurrence of
1073–1085.
12 T. M. Ross, B. Moubaraki, D. R. Turner, G. J. Halder, G. Chastanet,
´
S. M. Neville, J. D. Cashion, J. F. Letard, S. R. Batten and
K. S. Murray, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2011, 1395–1417.
highly cooperative SCO systems has been highlighted in triazole- 13 T. M. Ross, B. Moubaraki, K. S. Wallwork, S. R. Batten and
based coordination chains.4,25 In contrast, the corresponding
chains in 1 are clearly interacting with each other in the b direction
K. S. Murray, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 10147–10155.
14 H. S. Scott, T. M. Ross, S. R. Batten, I. A. Gass, B. Moubaraki,
S. M. Neville and K. S. Murray, Aust. J. Chem., 2012, 65, 874–882.
(Fig. S8c, ESI†), while the FeꢀꢀꢀFe separation in the c direction is 15 T. M. Ross, B. Moubaraki, S. R. Batten and K. S. Murray, Dalton
Trans., 2012, 41, 2571–2581.
16 T. M. Ross, B. Moubaraki, S. M. Neville, S. R. Batten and
significantly shorter for 1, compared to 2 (12.658 vs. 15.689 Å in
the LS state, Tables S4 and S5, ESI†). Overall, the denser
K. S. Murray, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 1512–1523.
packing of the transiting centres (for instance, the sum of the 17 N. Wannarit, O. Roubeau, S. Youngme and P. Gamez, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 2013, 730–737.
three Feꢀ ꢀ ꢀFe separation distances is 32.508 Å for LS 1 while it is
18 N. Wannarit, O. Roubeau, S. Youngme, S. J. Teat and P. Gamez,
35.397 Å for LS 2; Tables S4 and S5, ESI†), and the multi-
Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 7120–7130.
dimensional set of supramolecular interactions in 1 justifies its 19 ca. 5% of the Fe(II) ions remain in the HS state; the lowering of wT
below 25 K corresponds to their zero-field splitting effect.
20 O. Roubeau, M. Castro, R. Burriel, J. G. Haasnoot and J. Reedijk,
greater cooperative behaviour.
In conclusion, the judicious (apparently minor) modifica-
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115, 3003–3012.
tion of a ligand (i.e. from L1F to L1) has allowed the preparation 21 M. Sorai, Y. Nakazawa, M. Nakano and Y. Miyazaki, Chem. Rev.,
2013, 113, PR41–PR122.
22 M. Marchivie, P. Guionneau, J. F. Letard and D. Chasseau, Acta
of a SCO iron(II) compound with a strongly enhanced coopera-
tivity. Indeed, while the earlier compound 2 exhibits a gradual
´
Crystallogr., Sect. B, 2005, 61, 25–28.
SCO (DT80 = 50 K), 1 displays an abrupt spin transition (DT80 = 8 K), 23 J. K. McCusker, A. L. Rheingold and D. N. Hendrickson, Inorg.
Chem., 1996, 35, 2100–2112.
24 P. Guionneau, M. Marchivie, G. Bravic, J. F. Letard and D. Chasseau,
with a small hysteresis loop of 1 K. This drastically distinct
behaviour is ascribed to a better communication between the
´
Top. Curr. Chem., 2004, 234, 97–128.
transiting metal centres; for instance, the 1D chains of Fe(II) 25 J. Linares, H. Spiering and F. Varret, Eur. Phys. J. B, 1999, 10, 271–275.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1003--1005 | 1005