Please do not adjust margins
Green Chemistry
Page 5 of 7
DOI: 10.1039/C7GC00503B
Journal Name
ARTICLE
easier at more negative potentials. Therefore, the high activity coupling in the presence of LiI. This study opens a way for
of Cu 1/BN-C30 electrode for CO2 reduction to acetic acid can highly efficient CO2 reduction to C2+ products by combination
be attributed to the synergistic effect among the C-doped BN, of composite catalysts and suitable electrolytes with promoter.
Cu metal center, N-based ligand, and the electrolyte.
On the basis of all the results above, we proposed a
Acknowledgements
plausible mechanism for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to
acetic acid (Fig. 4). First, CO2 is adsorbed on the surface of
·-
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
electrode and reduced to CO2 in the present of [Emim]BF4,
China (21133009, 21533011, 21403253) and Chinese Academy
which may be due to that the complex [Emim-CO2]+ formed
of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-SLH013).
through the hydrogen bond between CO2 and [Emim]+.42,43 It
can reduce the reaction barrier forelectron transfer to CO2.35,44
Then, the formation of COads and the protonation of CO2·- may
occur simultaneously, and the former is the main procedure.
Notes and references
1
J. Klankermayer, S. Wesselbaum, K. Beydoun and W. Leitner,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 7296.
COads can be transformed into CHOads via capturing a pair of
electron and proton, followed by the protonation of CHOads
,
2
E. M. Nichols, J. J. Gallagher, C. Liu, Y. Su, J. Resasco, Y. Yu, Y.
Sun, P. Yang, M. C. Y. Chang and C. J. Chang, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U. S. A., 2015, 112, 11461.
which formed CH3Oads via accepting another two electrons.
The downstream step is the conversion of CH3Oads to
methanol, which was detected in the product. Subsequently,
with the promotion of Lewis acidic cation Li+, CH3I may form on
the surface of electrode by the reaction of methanol and I-. It
can be captured by the Cu species (Cu*) to form CH3Cu*I,
which is a basic step in organic synthesis and has been well
3
4
5
M. He, Y. Sun and B. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
9620.
M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto and A. Angelini, Chem. Rev., 2014,
114, 1709.
M. Cui, Q. Qian, Z. He, Z. Zhang, J. Ma, T. Wu, G. Yang and B.
Han, Chem. Sci., 2016,
L. Zhang and Z. Hou, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 3395.
D. D. Zhu, J. L. Liu and S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 3423.
J. Qiao, Y. Liu, F. Hong and J. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014,
43, 631.
7, 5200.
6
7
8
·-
proven.29,37 As the process of CO2 formation via single
electron transfer to CO2 is fast, CH3Cu*I can combine with
·-
another CO2 and generate CH3COOCu*I. Finally, CH2COOCu*I
9
C. E. Tornow, M. R. Thorson, S. Ma, A. A. Gewirth and P. J. A.
Kenis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 19520.
is protonated, resulting in the production of acetic acid. The
by-products, LiOH and HI generated in situ neutralized
spontaneously to form LiI and H2O. All these catalytic species
can be regenerated for the next process. Discussion of more
detailed mechanism is very interesting, but is very difficult at
present, which needs to be studied further.
10 F. Calle-Vallejo and M. T. M. Koper, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2013, 52, 7282.
11 Y. Liu, S. Chen, X. Quan and H. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
137, 11631.
12 D. Ren, Y. Deng, A. D. Handoko, C. S. Chen, S. Malkhandi and
B. S. Yeo, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2814.
13 F. S. Roberts, K. P. Kuhl and A. Nilsson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2015, 54, 5179.
14 C. W. Li and M. W. Kanan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 7231.
15 R. Angamuthu, P. Byers, M. Lutz, A. L. Spek and E. Bouwman,
Science, 2010, 327, 313.
16 S. Lee, D. Kim and J. Lee, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54
14701.
,
17 A. A. Peterson, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, J. Rossmeisl and J.
K. Norskov, Energy Environ. Sci., 2010, , 1311.
18 K. J. P. Schouten, Y. Kwon, C. J. M. van der Ham, Z. Qin and M.
T. M. Koper, Chem. Sci., 2011, , 1902.
3
2
19 B. Kumar, M. Asadi, D. Pisasale, S. Sinha-Ray, B. A. Rosen, R.
Haasch, J. Abiade, A. L. Yarin and A. Salehi-Khojin, Nat.
Commun., 2013, 4, 2819.
Fig. 4 Schematic pathway for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to
acetic acid in this work.
20 C. W. Machan, S. A. Chabolla, J. Yin, M. K. Gilson, F. A. Tezcan
and C. P. Kubiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 14598.
21 S. Zhang, P. Kang, S. Ubnoske, M. K. Brennaman, N. Song, R. L.
House, J. T. Glass and T. J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014,
136, 7845.
22 A. S. Varela, N. Ranjbar Sahraie, J. Steinberg, W. Ju, H.S. Oh
and P. Strasser, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 10758.
23 X. Sun, X. Kang, Q. Zhu, J. Ma, G. Yang, Z. Liu and B. Han,
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have discovered that Cu 1/BN-C30 exhibits
the highest performance for electrochemical reduction of CO2
to acetic acid up to date. The Faradaic efficiency of acetic acid
can reach 80.3 % at a current density of 13.9 mA cm-2 in
[Emim]BF4 aqueous solution with 25 mol% [Emim]BF4 and 75
mol% water in the presence of 0.01 M LiI. The superior
performance of Cu 1/BN-C30 results mainly from the synergistic
effect among the BN-C30, Cu metal center, N-based ligand, and
the electrolyte for producing acetic acid. BN-C30 can adsorb
CO2 and convert it to CO2·-. Cu complex can help the formation
and protonation of COads, CHOads and CH3Oads,and the C-C
Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 2883.
24 M. Xu, T. Liang, M. Shi and H. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113
,
3766.
25 L. M. Azofra, D. R. MacFarlane and C. Sun, Chem. Commun.,
2016, 52, 3548.
26 Q. Sun, Z. Li, D. J. Searles, Y. Chen, G. Lu and A. Du, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8246.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins