ChemComm
Communication
proved to be effective as single and two-photon luminescence
cellular imaging dyes. Fluorescence microscopy imaging and
ICP-MS revealed that most of the novel ruthenium complexes
stained the cell cytoplasm, rather than the nucleus. Due to their
low cytotoxicities to living cells, photostabilities, pH resistance,
membrane permeabilities, and especially their large two-photon
absorption cross sections, RuL1–7 are believed to have great potential
as biocompatible dyes for living cells both in OPM and TPM
imaging. These novel dinuclear ruthenium complexes provide a
platform for the design of new TPM imaging dyes.
Fig. 4 Photostability comparison of RuL4 and MitoTracker Green in HeLa
cells. (a) and (b) OPM images of HeLa cells stained with RuL4 and
MitoTracker Green, respectively. The images were taken under successive
irradiation. The wavelengths for RuL4 and MitoTracker Green irradiation
were 458 and 488 nm, respectively.
This project was financially supported by NSFC (21071155,
21172273, 21171177, 91122010, J1103305), the 973 Program
(2014CB845604), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and
Innovative Research Team at the University of China (No. IRT1298).
Notes and references
As expected, the results showed a substantial difference between
the nucleus (B0.03 pg Ru per cell) and the cytoplasm (B0.3 pg Ru
per cell), suggesting that more than 90% of the ruthenium was
distributed in the cell cytoplasm (Fig. 3d).
1 (a) T. Terai and T. Nagano, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2008, 12, 515;
(b) M. Y. Berezin and S. Achilefu, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 2641;
(c) Y. M. Yang, Q. Zhao, W. Feng and F. Y. Li, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 192.
2 G. P. Pfeifer, Y. H. You and A. Besaratinia, Mutat. Res., 2005, 571, 19.
3 W. R. Zipfel, R. M. Willams and W. W. Webb, Nat. Biotechnol., 2003,
21, 1369.
To further explore the application of Ru(II) complexes as cellular
dyes, the photostabilities of RuL1–7 were examined in comparison to
commercially available MitoTracker Green in living HeLa cells via
photobleaching experiments. Fig. 4 shows that the fluorescence
intensity of MitoTracker Green decreased 80% after 80 s (and 93%
for 300 s) of irradiation. In contrast to this nearly complete photo-
bleaching, the fluorescence intensity of RuL4 decreased only 38%
after 300 s of irradiation, suggesting greater photostability of RuL4 in
comparison to MitoTracker Green. Similar results were observed for
other Ru(II) complexes (Fig. S33 and S34, ESI†). For biological
applications of a dye, it should operate in a wide pH range.
The effect of pH on the luminescent response of RuL1–7 was
investigated. The pH titration curve revealed that the luminescence
intensity was barely affected when the pH was varied from 4–10
(Fig. S35, ESI†).
We then decided to investigate the mechanism of cellular uptake
of the Ru complex using confocal microscopy (Fig. S36, ESI†) and flow
cytometry (Fig. S37, ESI†). To determine whether RuL4 entered the cell
via an energy-dependent or energy-independent transport pathway,
HeLa cells were either incubated with RuL4 at 4 1C or pretreated with
the metabolic inhibitors 2-deoxy-D-glucose and oligomycin.16 Fig. S36b
and c (ESI†) show that cellular luminescence was significantly
suppressed in cases when the cells were incubated with the complex
at 4 1C or pretreated with the metabolic inhibitors, indicating that
RuL4 uptake followed an energy-dependent pathway. Endocytosis is
well known as the most common energy-dependent pathway by
4 U. K. Tirlapur and K. Konig, Nature, 2002, 418, 290.
5 (a) H. M. Kim and B. R. Cho, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 863;
(b) M. Pawlicki, H. A. Collins, R. G. Denning and H. L. Anderson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3244; (c) S. Yao and K. D. Belfield,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 3199; (d) B. Dumat, G. Bordeau, E. Faurel-
Paul, F. Mahuteau-Betzer, N. Saettel, G. Metge, C. Fiorini-
Debuisschert, F. Charra and M.-P. Teulade-Fichou, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2013, 135, 12697; (e) H. Zhang, J. Fan, J. Wang, S. Zhang, B. Dou
and X. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 11663; ( f ) S. K. Bae,
C. H. Heo, D. J. Choi, D. Sen, E.-H. Joe, B. R. Cho and H. M. Kim,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9915.
6 Q. Zhao, C. Huang and F. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 2508.
7 (a) S. Botchway, M. Charnley, J. Haycock, A. Parker, D. Rochester,
J. Weinstein and J. Williams, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2008,
105, 16071; (b) C. K. Koo, K. L. Wong, C. W. Y. Man, Y. W. Lam,
K. Y. So, H. L. Tam, S. W. Tsao, K. W. Cheah, K. C. Lau, Y. Y. Yang,
J. C. Chen and M. H. W. Lam, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 872; (c) C. K. Koo,
L. K. Y. So, K. L. Wong, Y. M. Ho, Y. W. Lam, M. H. W. Lam, K. W. Cheah,
C. C. W. Cheng and W. M. Kwok, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 3942.
8 (a) Y. Hai, J. J. Chen, P. Zhao, H. Lv, Y. Yu, P. Xu and J. L. Zhang,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2435; (b) J. Jing, J. Chen, Y. Hai, J. Zhan,
P. Xu and J. L. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 3315.
9 (a) D. R. Larson, W. R. Zipfel, R. M. Williams, S. W. Clark, M. P. Bruchez,
F. W. Wise and W. W. Webb, Science, 2003, 300, 1434; (b) X. Michalet,
F. F. Pinaud, L. A. Bentolila, J. M. Tsay, S. Doose, J. J. Li, G. Sundaresan,
A. M. Wu, S. S. Gambhir and S. Weiss, Science, 2005, 307, 538; (c) L. Cao,
X. Wang, M. J. Meziani, F. S. Lu, H. F. Wang, P. J. G. Luo, Y. Lin,
B. A. Harruff, L. M. Veca, D. Murray, S. Y. Xie and Y. P. Sun, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 11318; (d) S. K. Chakraborty, J. A. J. Fitzpatrick,
J. A. Phillippi, S. Andreko, A. S. Waggoner, W. P. Bruchez and
B. Ballou, Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 2618.
´
10 V. Fernandez-Moreira, F. Thorp-Greenwood and M. P. Coogan,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 186.
which eukaryotic cells uptake extracellular materials. Endocytosis is 11 M. R. Gill and J. A. Thomas, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 3179.
12 (a) S. C. Boca, M. Four, A. Bonne, B. van der Sanden, S. Astilean,
also affected by temperature or adenosine triphosphate (ATP). We
used the endocytic inhibitors chloroquine and NH4Cl to examine the
P. L. Baldeck and G. Lemercier, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4590; (b) H. Ke,
H. Wang, W.-K. Wong, N.-K. Mak, D. W. J. Kwong, K.-L. Wong and
role of this pathway in RuL4 uptake. After treatment with these
inhibitors (Fig. S36d and e, ESI†), no significant suppression of
luminescence was observed, suggesting that endocytosis was not
H.-L. Tam, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6678; (c) P. Zhang, L. Pei, Y. Chen,
W. Xu, Q. Lin, J. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Shen, L. Ji and H. Chao, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2013, 19, 15494.
13 K. Nakamaru, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1982, 55, 2697.
responsible for the uptake of RuL4. This is not surprising because 14 R. P. Haugland, in Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals,
ed. M. T. Z. Spence, Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, 1996, p. 144.
15 (a) C. Xu and W. W. Webb, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 1996, 13, 481; (b) N. S.
cellular uptake mechanisms are generally complex and diverse.
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a new
Makarov, M. Drobizhev and A. Rebane, Opt. Express, 2008, 16, 4029.
series of dinuclear Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes (RuL1–7) that 16 C. A. Puckett and J. K. Barton, Biochemistry, 2008, 47, 11711.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2123--2125 | 2125